Transcript Lect 5

“The highest form of human intelligence is
the ability to observe without judging”
Krishnamurti
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the
rational mind is a faithful servant. We have
created a society that honors the servant
and has forgotten the gift”
Albert Einstein
“The mind is everything,
what you think you become”
Buddha
U6115: Climate & Water
Tuesday, August 16 2005
• Water Properties
•
•
•
Heat capacity
latent heat
saturation vapor pressure
•
•
Evaporation
transpiration, mass/energy
balance
• Evaporation
• Droughts
•
Physical and historical impacts
...Now the wind grew strong and
hard,
it worked at the rain crust
in the corn fields.
Little by little the sky
was darkened by the mixing dust,
and the wind felt over the earth,
loosened the dust and carried it
away.
The Grapes of Wrath,
John Steinbeck.
Heat Capacity – Specific Heat
Land vs Ocean breeze
Heat Capacity
Substance
Heat Capacity
(Calorie/g.C)
Water
1.00
Sea water
0.94
Air
0.25
Granite
0.20
Change in amount of heat (Q): DQ
DQ = M x Cp x DT
But
Mass = rw x Volume
DQ = rw x V x Cp x DT
Latent Heat - Change of phase
Liquid  Solid = 80 calories per gram
Liquid  Gas = 540 calories per gram
DQ = rw x V x CL
Evapotranspiration
evapotranspiration summarizes all processes that return liquid water back
to the atmosphere into water vapor
- evaporation: direct transfer of water from open water bodies
- transpiration: indirect transfer of water from root-stomatal
system
• Photosynthesis requires water as well as solar energy
• of the water taken up by plants, ~95% is returned to the atmosphere
through their stomata (only 5% is turned into biomass!)
• potential evaporation (PE), i.e. the evaporation rate given an unrestricted
water supply - different from actual evaporation
• how can the actual evapotranspiration be measured?
• water balance
• energy balance
• or combination of both
Evapotranspiration
Apart from precipitation, the most significant component of the hydrologic
budget is evapotranspiration. Evapotranspiration varies regionally and
seasonally; during a drought it varies according to weather and wind
conditions
Slightly more than 10% of atmospheric moisture (40,000 bg) is
precipitated as rain, sleet, hail, or snow in the conterminous USA. The
disposition of this precipitation is illustrated below.
Evapotranspiration: ~ 67%
(majority of loss through transpiration: 97%)
Runoff: 29%
Groundwater outflow: ~2%
Consumption: ~2%
Evapotranspiration
Estimates of average statewide evapotranspiration for the conterminous
United States range from about 40% of the average annual precipitation in
the Northwest and Northeast to about 100% in the Southwest. During a
drought, the significance of evapotranspiration is magnified, because
evapotranspiration continues to deplete the limited remaining water
supplies in water bodies and soils
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
1) from the water balance
this approach may suffer from the uncertainties in the numbers, example:
dV/dt = p + rsi - rso - et = 0  et = p + rsi - rso
p = 107±5105 m3/y (±5%)
rsi = 109±1.5108 m3/y (±15%)
rso = 9.95108±1.5108 m3/y (±15%)
Here, if we neglect the groundwater inflows and outflows, we can use these values
to solve for et.
The results, accumulating the errors as we go, is:
1.5107±3108 m3/y
Unrealistic to expect to be able to quantify accurately all terms in a water balance
for a catchment to solve for et, especially over short periods where storage changes
are both substantial and difficult to measure precisely (or predict).
Diagnostic  NOT predictive approach
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
First Law of Thermodynamics: conservation of energy (E)
Thermodynamic principles hold that the net radiant energy arriving across the
boundary of a surface land system (including a very thin top soil layer, vegetation,
and immediate surrounding air), must be exactly balanced by other energy fluxes
across the boundary and the net change in energy held within the volume.
Total incoming E = Outgoing E + any increase in the body’s internal E (DQ)
dQ/dt = Rn - G - H - El
Rn = net (solar) radiation
G = output (conduction) to the ground
H = output (sensible heat) to atmosphere
El = output of latent heat
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
All matter has internal energy (expressed in calories or joules)
a) Sensible heat is the portion of internal energy that is proportional to
temperature (heat sensed by contact). The specific heat capacity provides a
measure of how a substance’s internal energy changes with temperature
dEu = Cp  m  dT
Cp = dEu/(dT  m)
Water has a specific heat of 1.0 cal/g.°C or 4.2x103 J/kg.°C
b) Latent heat is the amount of internal energy that is released or absorbed
during phase change (no change in temperature), at a constant temperature.
lv = 2.5 - (2.18  10-3  DT)  106 J/kg
At 20°C  lv = 2.45x106 J/kg
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
The rate of evaporation can be described, in the context of the energy
balance equation, as an energy flux
dQ/dt = Rn - G - H - El
or
El = Rn - G - H - dQ/dt
Since the heat flux is related to the rate of evapotranspiration (through
latent heat of vaporization)
et = El/(rwlv)
We can then substitute this later equation into the previous one:
et = (Rn - G - H - dQ/dt)/(rwlv)
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
Example: Daily evaporation from a forest on a sunny day (Rn = 200 W/m2)
et = (Rn - G - H - dQ/dt)/(rwlv)
If we can neglect H and G and assume that T (thermal energy content, Q) within
the forest remains approximately constant, then:
et = (Rn)/(rwlv)
et = (200 W/m2) /(1000kg/m3)  (2.5x106 J/kg) = 8.010-8 m/s = 0.7 cm/day
However, we need to consider the state (wetness) of the surface to understand and
quantify how the received energy is partitioned.
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
When water is in limited supply, the surface becomes warmer than in the wet cases
and more energy is removed from the control volume through conduction in the soil
and heating of the air.
In this case the surface properties, rather than the atmospheric conditions, are
controlling the rate of evapotranspiration. (eg. Higher winds and lower saturation will
increase evaporation rate, while reduced solar radiation - clouds - will reduce
evaporation)
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
Relationship between surface wetness and the partitioning of received energy
between evaporation and heating of air and soil
Evapotranspiration
Estimation of ET
2) from the Energy balance
The rate of et that occurs under prevailing solar input and atmospheric properties,
if the surface is fully wet, is commonly referred as Potential Evapotranspiration
(PET).
For a catchment water balance, we are interested in the actual et (rate at which
water is actually removed).
When a surface is wet et/PET = 1, when it is dry et/PET ~ 0
Spatial Variability of Streamflow
Large-scale spatial variability in streamflow and storage
Spatial Variability of Streamflow
Large-scale spatial variability in streamflow is explained by
precipitation/evaporation balance to a large extent (~90%) and
additional processes to a smaller one (soil water storage, seasonality)
Temporal Variability of Streamflow
For the Catskill region, the change in evapotranspiration and snowpack
amount will offset any increase in precipitation that may occur.
Droughts
The Concept of Drought
Drought is a normal, recurrent feature of climate, although many erroneously
consider it a rare and random event. It occurs in virtually all climatic zones,
but its characteristics vary significantly from one region to another. Drought
is a temporary aberration; it differs from aridity, which is restricted to low
rainfall regions and is a permanent feature of climate.
Drought, as a normal, recurrent feature of climate, occurs almost everywhere,
although its features vary from region to region. Defining drought is therefore
difficult; it depends on differences in regions, needs, and disciplinary
perspectives.
 In Libya  when annual rainfall is less than 180 mm
 In Bali  after a period of only 6 days without rain!
Drought should not be viewed as merely a physical phenomenon or natural
event. Its impacts on society result from the interplay between a natural event
(less precipitation than expected resulting from natural climatic variability)
and the demand people place on water supply.
Operational definition of droughts
Operational definitions help people identify the beginning, end, and degree of severity of
a drought. To determine the beginning of droughts, operational definitions specify the
degree of departure from the average of precipitation or some other climatic variable over
some time period. This is usually done by comparing the current situation to the historical
average, often based on a 30-year period of record. The threshold identified as the
beginning of a drought (e.g., 75% of average precipitation over a specified time period) is
usually established somewhat arbitrarily, rather than on the basis of its precise
relationship to specific impacts.
Meteorological drought is usually an expression of
precipitation’s departure from normal over time
Agricultural drought occurs when there isn’t enough
soil moisture to meet the needs of a particular crop
Hydrological drought refers to deficiencies in surface
and subsurface water supplies
Socioeconomic drought occurs when physical water
shortage affect supply and demand of economic goods
Drought Indices
Drought indices assimilate thousands of bits of data on rainfall, snowpack,
streamflow, and other water supply indicators into a comprehensible big picture. A
drought index value is typically a single number, far more useful than raw data for
decision making.
Some indices are better suited than others for certain uses.
 Palmer Drought Severity Index  widely used by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture to determine when to grant emergency drought assistance (better when
working with large areas of uniform topography)
 Surface Water Supply Index (takes snowpack and other unique conditions into
account)  useful to supplement Palmer values in Western states, with mountainous
terrain and the resulting complex regional microclimates.
Drought Indices
Palmer Drought Severity Index  The PDSI is a meteorological drought index, and it
responds to weather conditions that have been abnormally dry or abnormally wet. When
conditions change from dry to normal or wet, for example, the drought measured by the
PDSI ends without taking into account streamflow, lake and reservoir levels, and other
longer-term hydrologic impacts. The PDSI is calculated based on precipitation and
temperature data, as well as the local Available Water Content (AWC) of the soil.
PDSI is designed for agriculture but does not accurately represent the hydrological
impacts resulting from longer droughts. Also, the Palmer Index is applied within the
United States but has little acceptance elsewhere.
Palmer Classification
4.0 or more
3.0 to 3.99
2.0 to 2.99
1.0 to 1.99
extremely wet
very wet
moderately wet
slightly wet
0.5 to 0.99
0.49 to -0.49
-0.5 to -0.99
-1.0 to -1.99
-2.0 to -2.99
-3.0 to -3.99
-4.0 or less
incipient wet spell
near normal
incipient dry spell
mild drought
moderate drought
severe drought
extreme drought
Drought Indices
Surface Water Supply Index The Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) was
developed to complement the Palmer Index for moisture conditions across the state
of Colorado. It is an indicator of surface water conditions and described the index as
“mountain water dependent”, in which mountain snowpack is a major component.
Like the Palmer Index, the SWSI is centered on zero and has a range between -4.2
and +4.2 (the index is unique to each basin, which limits interbasin comparisons).
May 2004
Drought Indices
Keetch and Byram Drought Index Keetch and Byram (1968) designed a drought index
specifically for fire potential assessment. It is a number representing the net effect of evapotranspiration
and precipitation in producing cumulative moisture deficiency in deep duff and upper soil layers. It is a
continuous index, relating to the flammability of organic material in the ground.
The KBDI attempts to measure the amount of precipitation necessary to return the soil to full field
capacity. It is a closed system ranging from 0 to 800 units (800 is the maximum drought that is possible):
 KBDI = 0 - 200: Soil moisture and large class
fuel moistures are high and do not contribute much
to fire intensity. Typical of spring dormant season
following winter precipitation.
 KBDI = 200 - 400: Typical of late spring, early
growing season. Lower litter and duff layers are
drying and beginning to contribute to fire intensity.
 KBDI = 400 - 600: Typical of late summer, early
fall. Lower litter and duff layers actively contribute
to fire intensity and will burn actively.
 KBDI = 600 - 800: Often associated with more
severe drought with increased wildfire occurrence.
Intense, deep burning fires with significant
downwind spotting can be expected. Live fuels can
also be expected to burn actively at these levels.
Drought Monitoring
Temporal and spatial distribution  Drought forecast using combined models
Drought Monitoring
Temporal and spatial distribution  Drought forecast using combined models
Drought Temporal and spatial variability
• The Dust Bowl (1933-1940)
• The 6-years Texas Drought (1951-1956)
Drought Temporal and spatial variability
Drought Temporal and spatial variability
12000
2000
1800
10000
1600
1400
8000
1200
6000
1000
800
4000
600
400
2000
200
0
0
May-31 Aug-39 Oct-47 Jan-56 Mar-64 Jun-72 Aug-80 Nov-88 Feb-97 Apr-05
Date
Hudson streamflow (m3/s)
St. Lawrence streamflow (m3/s)
St.Lawrence
Hudson
North East Atlantic Region
Drought Temporal and spatial variability
Streamflow forecast and historical data
The Colorado River
South Texas Reservoirs
Nueces River Stream Flow
3.5E+09
3 Rivers
Mathis
3.0E+09
Stream Flow (m3/yr)
2.5E+09
2.0E+09
1.5E+09
1.0E+09
5.0E+08
0.0E+00
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
Year
1970
1980
1990
2000
250000
Volume (AcFt)
200000
South Texas Reservoirs
150000
100000
50000
Series1
0
Nueces River Stream Flow
1/8/56
6/30/61 12/21/66 6/12/72
3 Rivers
Mathis
3.0E+09
2.5E+09
Stream Flow (m3/yr)
5/26/83 11/15/88
Year
3.5E+09
2.0E+09
1.5E+09
1.0E+09
5.0E+08
0.0E+00
1910
12/3/77
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
Year
1970
1980
1990
2000
5/8/94
10/29/99 4/20/05
Drought Temporal and spatial variability
http://drought.unl.edu/dm/thumbnails/12_week.gif
European Conditions 2003-2005
Annual temperature deviation in Europe in 2003
(Temperature deviation, relative to average temperature from 1961-1990)
European Conditions 2005
European Conditions 2005
Precipitation deficit in Spain since beginning of water year (1 Sept,
2004)
97% of Portugal’s territory is affected by “severe” drought conditions