Transcript Course Review

CS 414 Review
Goals for Today
• Review half the book
– Make sure intuition is clear
– Ask questions
• For more detailed information
– Use past slides, “redo” homework and prelims
2
Operating System: Definition
Definition
An Operating System (OS) provides a virtual machine
on top of the real hardware, whose interface is more
convenient than the raw hardware interface.
Applications
OS interface
Operating System
Physical machine interface
Hardware
Advantages
Easy to use, simpler to code, more reliable, more secure, …
3
You can say: “I want to write XYZ into file ABC”
What is in an OS?
Applications
Quake
System Utils
Sql Server
Shells
Windowing & graphics
OS Interface
Operating
System
Services
Naming
Windowing & Gfx
Networking
Virtual Memory
Generic I/O
File System
Device Drivers
Access Control
Process Management
Memory Management
Physical m/c Intf
Interrupts, Cache, Physical Memory, TLB, Hardware Devices
Logical OS Structure
4
Crossing Protection Boundaries
• User calls OS procedure for “privileged” operations
• Calling a kernel mode service from user mode program:
– Using System Calls
– System Calls switches execution to kernel mode
User process
System Call
Trap
Mode bit = 0
Save Caller’s state
User Mode
Mode bit = 1
Resume process
Kernel Mode
Mode bit = 0
Return
Mode bit = 1
Execute system call
Restore state
5
What is a process?
• The unit of execution
• The unit of scheduling
• Thread of execution + address space
• Is a program in execution
– Sequential, instruction-at-a-time execution of a program.
The same as “job” or “task” or “sequential process”
6
Process State Transitions
interrupt
New
Exit
dispatch
Ready
Running
Waiting
Processes hop across states as a result of:
• Actions they perform, e.g. system calls
• Actions performed by OS, e.g. rescheduling
• External actions, e.g. I/O
7
Context Switch
• For a running process
– All registers are loaded in CPU and modified
• E.g. Program Counter, Stack Pointer, General Purpose Registers
• When process relinquishes the CPU, the OS
– Saves register values to the PCB of that process
• To execute another process, the OS
– Loads register values from PCB of that process
 Context Switch
 Process of switching CPU from one process to another
 Very machine dependent for types of registers
8
Threads and Processes
• Most operating systems therefore support two entities:
– the process,
• which defines the address space and general process attributes
– the thread,
• which defines a sequential execution stream within a process
• A thread is bound to a single process.
– For each process, however, there may be many threads.
• Threads are the unit of scheduling
• Processes are containers in which threads execute
9
Schedulers
• Process migrates among several queues
– Device queue, job queue, ready queue
• Scheduler selects a process to run from these queues
• Long-term scheduler:
– load a job in memory
– Runs infrequently
• Short-term scheduler:
– Select ready process to run on CPU
– Should be fast
• Middle-term scheduler
– Reduce multiprogramming or memory consumption
10
CPU Scheduling Algorithms
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FCFS
LIFO
SJF
SRTF
Priority Scheduling
Round Robin
Multi-level Queue
Multi-level Feedback Queue
11
CPU Scheduling Metrics
•
•
•
•
•
CPU utilization: percentage of time the CPU is not idle
Throughput: completed processes per time unit
Turnaround time: submission to completion
Waiting time: time spent on the ready queue
Response time: response latency
12
Race conditions
• Definition: timing dependent error involving shared state
– Whether it happens depends on how threads scheduled
• Hard to detect:
– All possible schedules have to be safe
• Number of possible schedule permutations is huge
• Some bad schedules? Some that will work sometimes?
– they are intermittent
• Timing dependent = small changes can hide bug
The Fundamental Issue: Atomicity
• Our atomic operation is not done atomically by machine
– E.g. incrementing a variable by one (i++) is three machine
instructions (load, increment, store).
– Process can be interrupted between any machine instruction
• Atomic Unit: instruction sequence guaranteed to execute
indivisibly
– Also called “critical section” (CS)
 When 2 processes want to execute their Critical Section,
– One process finishes its CS before other is allowed to enter
14
Critical Section Problem
• Problem: Design a protocol for processes to cooperate,
such that only one process is in its critical section
– How to make multiple instructions seem like one?
Process 1
CS1
Process 2
CS2
Time 
Processes progress with non-zero speed, no assumption on clock speed
Used extensively in operating systems:
Queues, shared variables, interrupt handlers, etc.
15
Solution Structure
Shared vars:
Initialization:
Process:
...
...
Entry Section
Critical Section
Added to solve the CS problem
Exit Section
16
Solution Requirements
• Mutual Exclusion
– Only one process can be in the critical section at any time
• Progress
– Decision on who enters CS cannot be indefinitely postponed
• No deadlock
• Bounded Waiting
– Bound on #times others can enter CS, while I am waiting
• No livelock
• Also efficient (no extra resources), fair, simple, …
17
Semaphores
• Non-negative integer with atomic increment and decrement
• Integer ‘S’ that (besides init) can only be modified by:
– P(S) or S.wait(): decrement or block if already 0
– V(S) or S.signal(): increment and wake up process if any
• These operations are atomic
semaphore S;
P(S) {
while(S ≤ 0)
;
S--;
}
V(S) {
S++;
}
18
Semaphore Types
• Counting Semaphores:
– Any integer
– Used for synchronization
• Binary Semaphores
– Value 0 or 1
– Used for mutual exclusion (mutex)
Process i
Shared: semaphore S
P(S);
Init: S = 1;
Critical Section
V(S);
19
Mutexes and Synchronization
Deadlock
semaphore S;
Init: S = 0;
1;
P(S) {
while(S ≤ 0)
;
S--;
}
Process i
Process j
V(S) {
S++;
}
P(S);
P(S);
Code XYZ
Code ABC
V(S);
V(S);
20
Monitors
• Hoare 1974
• Abstract Data Type for handling/defining shared resources
• Comprises:
– Shared Private Data
• The resource
• Cannot be accessed from outside
– Procedures that operate on the data
• Gateway to the resource
• Can only act on data local to the monitor
– Synchronization primitives
• Among threads that access the procedures
21
Synchronization Using Monitors
• Defines Condition Variables:
– condition x;
– Provides a mechanism to wait for events
• Resources available, any writers
• 3 atomic operations on Condition Variables
– x.wait(): release monitor lock, sleep until woken up
 condition variables have waiting queues too
– x.notify(): wake one process waiting on condition (if there is one)
• No history associated with signal
– x.broadcast(): wake all processes waiting on condition
• Useful for resource manager
• Condition variables are not Boolean
– If(x) then { } does not make sense
22
Types of Monitors
What happens on notify():
• Hoare: signaler immediately gives lock to waiter (theory)
– Condition definitely holds when waiter returns
– Easy to reason about the program
• Mesa: signaler keeps lock and processor (practice)
– Condition might not hold when waiter returns
– Fewer context switches, easy to support broadcast
• Brinch Hansen: signaler must immediately exit monitor
– So, notify should be last statement of monitor procedure
23
Deadlocks
Definition:
Deadlock exists among a set of processes if
– Every process is waiting for an event
– This event can be caused only by another process in the set
• Event is the acquire of release of another resource
One-lane bridge
24
Four Conditions for Deadlock
• Coffman et. al. 1971
• Necessary conditions for deadlock to exist:
– Mutual Exclusion
• At least one resource must be held is in non-sharable mode
– Hold and wait
• There exists a process holding a resource, and waiting for another
– No preemption
• Resources cannot be preempted
– Circular wait
• There exists a set of processes {P1, P2, … PN}, such that
– P1 is waiting for P2, P2 for P3, …. and PN for P1
All four conditions must hold for deadlock to occur
25
Dealing with Deadlocks
• Proactive Approaches:
– Deadlock Prevention
• Negate one of 4 necessary conditions
• Prevent deadlock from occurring
– Deadlock Avoidance
• Carefully allocate resources based on future knowledge
• Deadlocks are prevented
• Reactive Approach:
– Deadlock detection and recovery
• Let deadlock happen, then detect and recover from it
• Ignore the problem
– Pretend deadlocks will never occur
– Ostrich approach
26
Safe State
• A state is said to be safe, if it has a process sequence
{P1, P2,…, Pn}, such that for each Pi,
the resources that Pi can still request can be satisfied by
the currently available resources plus the resources held
by all Pj, where j < i
• State is safe because OS can definitely avoid deadlock
– by blocking any new requests until safe order is executed
• This avoids circular wait condition
– Process waits until safe state is guaranteed
27
Banker’s Algorithm
• Decides whether to grant a resource request.
• Data structures:
n: integer
m: integer
available[1..m]
max[1..n,1..m]
allocation[1..n,1..m]
need[1..n,1..m]
# of processes
# of resources
available[i] is # of avail resources of type i
max demand of each Pi for each Ri
current allocation of resource Rj to Pi
max # resource Rj that Pi may still request
let request[i] be vector of # of resource Rj Process Pi wants
28
Basic Algorithm
1.
If request[i] > need[i] then
error (asked for too much)
2. If request[i] > available[i] then
wait (can’t supply it now)
3. Resources are available to satisfy the request
Let’s assume that we satisfy the request. Then we would have:
available = available - request[i]
allocation[i] = allocation [i] + request[i]
need[i] = need [i] - request [i]
Now, check if this would leave us in a safe state:
if yes, grant the request,
if no, then leave the state as is and cause process to wait.
29
Memory Management Issues
• Protection: Errors in process should not affect others
• Transparency: Should run despite memory size/location
gcc
Load Store
CPU
Translation box (MMU)
virtual
address
Physical
legal addr? address Physical
memory
Illegal?
fault
data
How to do this mapping?
30
Scheme 1: Load-time Linking
• Link as usual, but keep list of references
• At load time: determine the new base address
– Accordingly adjust all references (addition)
static a.out
0x3000
jump 0x2000
OS
0x6000
jump 0x5000
0x1000
0x4000
• Issues: handling multiple segments, moving in memory
31
Scheme 2: Execution-time Linking
• Use hardware (base + limit reg) to solve the problem
– Done for every memory access
– Relocation: physical address = logical (virtual) address + base
– Protection: is virtual address < limit?
OS
a.out
0x3000
MMU
Base: 0x3000
Limit: 0x2000
jump 0x2000
0x1000
a.out
jump 0x2000
0x6000
0x4000
– When process runs, base register = 0x3000, bounds register =
0x2000. Jump addr = 0x2000 + 0x3000 = 0x5000
32
Segmentation
• Processes have multiple base + limit registers
• Processes address space has multiple segments
– Each segment has its own base + limit registers
– Add protection bits to every segment Real memory
0x1000
0x3000
gcc
Text seg
r/o
0x5000 Stack seg
0x6000
0x2000
Base&Limit?
r/w
How to do the mapping?
0x8000
0x6000
33
Mapping Segments
• Segment Table
– An entry for each segment
– Is a tuple <base, limit, protection>
• Each memory reference indicates segment and offset
fault
Virtual addr
no
mem
yes
?
0x1000
3
128
+
Seg# offset
Seg table
Prot base
r
len
0x1000 512
seg
128
34
Fragmentation
• “The inability to use free memory”
• External Fragmentation:
– Variable sized pieces  many small holes over time
• Internal Fragmentation:
– Fixed sized pieces  internal waste if entire piece is not used
Word
??
gcc
External
fragmentation
emacs
allocated
stack
doom
Unused
(“internal
35
fragmentation”)
Paging
• Divide memory into fixed size pieces
– Called “frames” or “pages”
• Pros: easy, no external fragmentation
Pages
typical: 4k-8k
gcc
emacs
internal frag
36
Mapping Pages
• If 2m virtual address space, 2n page size
 (m - n) bits to denote page number, n for offset within page
Translation done using a Page Table
Virtual addr
3
VPN
((1<<12)|128)
128 (12bits)
page offsetpage table
?
“invalid”
Prot VPN
r
3
PPN
1
mem
0x1000
seg
128
PPN
37
Paging + Segmentation
• Paged segmentation
– Handles very long segments
– The segments are paged
• Segmented Paging
– When the page table is very big
– Segment the page table
– Let’s consider System 370 (24-bit address space)
Seg #
(4 bits)
page # (8 bits)
page offset (12 bits)
38
What is virtual memory?
• Each process has illusion of large address space
– 232 for 32-bit addressing
• However, physical memory is much smaller
• How do we give this illusion to multiple processes?
– Virtual Memory: some addresses reside in disk
page table
disk
Physical memory
39
Virtual Memory
• Load entire process in memory (swapping), run it, exit
– Is slow (for big processes)
– Wasteful (might not require everything)
• Solutions: partial residency
– Paging: only bring in pages, not all pages of process
– Demand paging: bring only pages that are required
• Where to fetch page from?
– Have a contiguous space in disk: swap file (pagefile.sys)
40
Page Faults
• On a page fault:
– OS finds a free frame, or evicts one from memory (which one?)
• Want knowledge of the future?
– Issues disk request to fetch data for page (what to fetch?)
• Just the requested page, or more?
– Block current process, context switch to new process (how?)
• Process might be executing an instruction
– When disk completes, set present bit to 1, and current process in
ready queue
41
Page Replacement Algorithms
• Random: Pick any page to eject at random
– Used mainly for comparison
• FIFO: The page brought in earliest is evicted
– Ignores usage
– Suffers from “Belady’s Anomaly”
• Fault rate could increase on increasing number of pages
• E.g. 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 with frame sizes 3 and 4
• OPT: Belady’s algorithm
– Select page not used for longest time
• LRU: Evict page that hasn’t been used the longest
– Past could be a good predictor of the future
42
Thrashing
• Processes in system require more memory than is there
– Keep throwing out page that will be referenced soon
– So, they keep accessing memory that is not there
• Why does it occur?
– No good reuse, past != future
– There is reuse, but process does not fit
– Too many processes in the system
43
Approach 1: Working Set
• Peter Denning, 1968
– Defines the locality of a program
pages referenced by process in last T seconds of execution
considered to comprise its working set
T: the working set parameter
• Uses:
– Caching: size of cache is size of WS
– Scheduling: schedule process only if WS in memory
– Page replacement: replace non-WS pages
44
Working Sets
• The working set size is num pages in the working set
– the number of pages touched in the interval (t, t-Δ).
• The working set size changes with program locality.
– during periods of poor locality, you reference more pages.
– Within that period of time, you will have a larger working set size.
• Don’t run process unless working set is in memory.
45
Approach 2: Page Fault Frequency
• thrashing viewed as poor ratio of fetch to work
• PFF = page faults / instructions executed
• if PFF rises above threshold, process needs more memory
– not enough memory on the system? Swap out.
• if PFF sinks below threshold, memory can be taken away
46
Allocation and deallocation
• What happens when you call:
– int *p = (int *)malloc(2500*sizeof(int));
• Allocator slices a chunk of the heap and gives it to the program
– free(p);
• Deallocator will put back the allocated space to a free list
• Simplest implementation:
– Allocation: increment pointer on every allocation
– Deallocation: no-op
– Problems: lots of fragmentation
heap (free memory)
allocation
current free position
47
Memory Allocator
• What allocator has to do:
– Maintain free list, and grant memory to requests
– Ideal: no fragmentation and no wasted time
• What allocator cannot do:
a
– Control order of memory requests and frees
– A bad placement cannot be revoked
b
malloc(20)?
20
10
20
10
20
• Main challenge: avoid fragmentation
48
What happens on free?
• Identify size of chunk returned by user
• Change sign on both signatures (make +ve)
• Combine free adjacent chunks into bigger chunk
– Worst case when there is one free chunk before and after
– Recalculate size of new free chunk
– Update the signatures
• Don’t really need to erase old signatures
49
Design features
• Which free chunks should service request
– Ideally avoid fragmentation… requires future knowledge
• Split free chunks to satisfy smaller requests
– Avoids internal fragmentation
• Coalesce free blocks to form larger chunks
– Avoids external fragmentation
20 10
30
30
30
50
Malloc & OS memory management
• Relocation
– OS allows easy relocation (change page table)
– Placement decisions permanent at user level
• Size and distribution
– OS: small number of large objects
– Malloc: huge number of small objects
heap
stack
data
code
51
Announcements
• Prelims graded
– Mean 76.3 (Median 76), Stddev 8.8, High 93 out of 104!
– Mean 73.4 (Median 73.1), Stddev 8.4, High 89.4 out of 100!
• Good job!
• Re-grade policy
– Submit written re-grade request to Joy.
• Entire prelim will be re-graded.
• We were generous the first time…
– If still unhappy, submit another re-grade request.
• Joy will re-grade herself
– If still unhappy, submit a third re-grade request.
• I will re-grade. Final grade is law.
52
Grade distribution
Grade Distribution (out of 104 points)
8
7
Frequency
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Score
53
Hand back prelims
54