pres14 - REGNET

Download Report

Transcript pres14 - REGNET

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks
REGNET
State of the Art and other Projects
2
Used State of the Art Technologies
Support technologies used for project
management and development process:
Unified Process (UP)
Unified Modelisation Language (UML)
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
3
Unified Process
Iterative development
Architecture-centric
Risk driven
Careful requirements management and
change control
Continuous verification of quality
Use case-driven
Use Case
Actor
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
UML everywhere
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
4
5
Kernel technologies
Mainly open-source
Implementation technologies: Java, PHP, ASP
Integration technologies: Web Services (SOAP,
WSDL), ebXML (Hermes MSH)
Data management technologies: Ixiasoft/Textml,
Apache/Xindice, MySQL
Presentation technologies: Apache Web server,
Apache/Jetspeed Portal
Operating systems: Linux, Windows
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
6
Contacts
The network of contacts has been extended with a particular attention to target groups
coming from the cultural heritage domain during conferences, workshops, fairs...
Extra European contact with the Research Library Group (USA) .
EU Projects: OpenHeritage, Kulturerbe, EUREKA – EUROCARE ,
CLEF, VNET5, COVAX, CULTOS, DigiCULT, EP2010, VICODI,
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
Technical vision for the SEEM
Single European Electronic Market
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
7
8
Clustering with OpenHeritage
Integration of technical tools, mainly in the collections
management area.
Legal framework. Where REGNET has focused on its development
and OpenHeritage on its validation and implementation;
Territorial Service Centers (TSC): each project have pointed out its
own peculiarities, with support and tourism functionality clearly
belonging to OpenHeritage, while meta-collections access,
workflow and e-business models and practices clearly carried out
by REGNET. For what concern e-commerce it has been carried out
by both but distinguished in focus and target;
Portals: OpenHeritage has clearly specialized in providing
community services and media brokering services for
professional operators, while REGNET has focused on general
portal.
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
9
Complementary Objectives
The REGNET Project is going to deliver a system, providing
a technological and organizational infrastructure to service
centres aimed at supporting cultural institutions and
industries.
One of the main objectives of the Open Heritage project,
instead, is the development of dynamic, computable
models of territorial cultural systems to assess and valorize
the qualities and strengths of each regional or local cultural
system.
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review
10
Complementary Objectives
REGNET aims to set up a network of (primarily
non-profit) cultural service centres providing
latest technology (via the REGNET system and
expertise) on reasonable costs for regional
cultural heritage institutions.
The final output of the Open Heritage is the
launch of a global "OpenHeritage.com" enterprise
for the exploitation of the European CH.
27 March 2003
REGNET Final Project Review