Computer Architecture A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition Prof
Download
Report
Transcript Computer Architecture A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition Prof
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
Prof. Zhang Gang
[email protected]
School of Computer Sci. & Tech.
Tianjin University, Tianjin, P. R. China
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
SIMD architectures can exploit significant data-level
parallelism for:
matrix-oriented scientific computing
media-oriented image and sound processors
SIMD is more energy efficient than MIMD
Only needs to fetch one instruction per data operation
Makes SIMD attractive for Personal Mobile Devices
SIMD allows programmer to continue to think
sequentially
Yet achieves parallel speedup by having parallel data
operations
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
Three variations of SIMD
Vector architectures
too expensive for microprocessors
Transistors and DRAM bandwidth
Multimedia SIMD instruction set extensions
x86 architectures
MMX-Multimedia Extensions
SSE-Streaming SIMD Extensions
AVX-Advanced Vector Extensions
Graphics Processor Units (GPUs)
Offering higher potential performance than
traditional multi-core computers
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
For x86 processors:
Expect two additional cores per chip per year
SIMD width to double every four years
Potential speedup from SIMD to be twice that
from MIMD!
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
Figure 4.1 Potential speedup via parallelism from MIMD, SIMD, and both MIMD and SIMD over time for
x86 computers. This figure assumes that two cores per chip for MIMD will be added every two years and the
number of operations for SIMD will double every four years.
Computer Architecture
A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition
Why do people pay attention to the SIMD
computer again?
2. Why do SIMD architectures can exploit datalevel parallelism for image and sound processors?
3. Which is better for programmers to think
sequentially and to think in parallel?
1.