US-169 (inc. Broadway Ext Bridge)/ I

Download Report

Transcript US-169 (inc. Broadway Ext Bridge)/ I

US-169 / I-70 “North Loop”
Planning Environmental Linkages Study
Pre-Proposal Workshop
Pre-Proposal Workshop
US-169 / I-70 PEL Study
___________________________________
• Welcome & Introductions
• RFP General Overview
• RFP Specifics Overview
• Questions
Pre-Proposal Workshop
US-169 / I-70 PEL Study
___________________________________
• MARC
• Ron Achelpohl, Darryl Fields, Charles Gorugantula,
Martin Rivarola,
• City of Kansas City, MO
• Wes Minder, Sheri McIntyre
• MoDOT
• Dan Niec, Susan Barry
Study Location
PEL study limits
• From 5th and 6th Street
interchange to the US169/MO Route-9 interchange
in Missouri.
4 miles
• From the I-70/I-670
interchange in Kansas to US71/I-670 interchange in
Missouri.
6 miles
• I-70 parallel corridor of
influence (I-670).
4 miles
PEL study background
This PEL study area includes critical access corridors into the region’s core.
• US-169 in Clay County, along with the Broadway Extension Bridge
over the Missouri River.
• “Downtown north loop” along the I-70 corridor is substandard
for current interstate facilities.
Why a PEL study?
•
Transportation infrastructure provides safe and reliable access to the region’s core, across rivers, county and
state boundaries.
•
Benefits of past investments are numerous and significant.
•
Transport of goods and services contributes to commercial activity and supports the regional economy.
•
Lifespan of these facilities is limited, and conditions around them change over time.
•
Due to the large investment needed to rehabilitate/replace infrastructure,
we must take a long-term look at future needs.
Study purpose
Other improvements to
be considered:
Overall objective:
•
• Develop a purpose and need statement, reasonable alternatives
and a phased implementation plan for multi-modal
transportation investments for subsequent analysis under NEPA.
access to Port of
Kansas City.
•
airspace around
Charles B. Wheeler
Downtown Airport.
•
Missouri River
navigation.
•
bicycle/pedestrian
accommodations.
•
impacts to transit and
railroads.
•
KDOT plans for
Lewis and Clark
Viaduct.
• General scope of proposed improvement is replacement or reuse
of the US- 169 bridge along with I-70 corridor improvements
• These improvements could include:
• Strategies to improve traffic flow at north and south ends
of Broadway Extension Bridge.
• Strategies to better connect street grid between River
Market and downtown Kansas City for future
redevelopment.
• According to NEPA regulations, PEL study will focus on issues
such as general location, mode choice, transportation
performance factors, known environmental and
cultural resource constraints, area-wide air quality
and land use implications.
Study purpose
What will we be looking for?
What will we not accomplish as part of this study?
Study will not produce a single preferred/recommended
alternative.
Study will produce a set of reasonable improvement
alternatives which could be implemented over time
according to a phasing strategy.
It will set foundation for future NEPA work
for segments of study area.
Study lead/partners/funding
• MARC will provide project management
• Project partners include
MARC/MODOT/KCMO/KDOT/UG.
• $3 million from STP funds.
Local match 750,000 (City of KCMO)
Next steps
Procurement of consultant teams for project assistance.
Solicitation
February 26, 2016
Pre-Proposal Workshop
February 29, 2016 (3:00pm)
Responses due
March 18, 2016 – 3:00pm
Notice to proceed
Estimated May 2016
Draft PEL
August 2017
Final PEL
November 2017
Request for Proposals
___________________________________
• Sections 1 and 2: Program Introduction and Background
• Response Submission and Due Date
• Response Contents
• Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6: Project Specifics
•
•
•
•
Title VI, DBE Goals
General Scope of Work
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Selection Process
• Appendix
• Key Partners, Prior Planning Work
• Available Analytic Tools and Data
Request for Proposals
___________________________________
• Sections 1 and 2: Program Introduction and Background
• Response Submission and Due Date
• Friday, March 18th – 3:00pm. 1 digital + 5 hard copies
• Response Contents
Item
Page Requirements
Letter of Transmittal
2 max single sided. Not included in
proposal page count
Table of Contents
Not included in proposal page count
Management Summary/Conceptual
Work Plan
Qualifications and Experience
Not to exceed 10 pages
Project Schedules Milestones and
Timelines
Appendix: Org Chart. Key Staff and
resumes
Not included in proposal page count
Request for Proposals
___________________________________
• Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6: Project Specifics
• Title VI, DBE Goals of 20%, certified by Missouri Regional
Certification Committee (MRCC)
• General Scope of Work
• Study Goals, Outreach & Engagement, Traffic Modeling And Analysis, Data
Collection, Statement of Purpose and Need, Evaluation Criteria, Initial
Alternatives, Refinement of Alternatives, Documentation
• Proposal Evaluation Criteria
•
•
•
•
Project Concept and Understanding (30 points)
General Experience of Planning Study Firm(s) (30 points)
General Experience of Traffic Modeling Firm(s) (30 points)
Past Performance (10 points)
• Selection Process
• Selection and Proposed Schedule
Traffic Modeling
and Analysis
• Understand, quantify
traffic impacts of
alternatives
• Regional Travel Impacts –
Dynamic Traffic
Assignment (DTA) Models
• Operational Impacts –
Traffic Microsimulation
Models
• Support evaluation of
alternatives
• Support public
outreach/stakeholder
engagement
Request for Proposals
___________________________________
• Appendix
• Key Partners, Prior Planning Work
• Available Analytic Tools and Data
US-169 / I-70 PEL Study
___________________________________
More information available online:
www.marc.org/pelstudy
If you have any questions please contact:
Martin Rivarola
Mid-America Regional Council
[email protected]