Transcript (Theory Of Everything???).

Theory Of Everything???
Goh Peng Ooi
Strictly Confidential
Page 1
Everything And Life
As Long As We Refuse To Include Our Sense, Purpose And
Language As Part Of Everything,
“Theory Of Everything” Is Not Theory Of Everything
The Study Of Our Primitive Senses Is Known As Foundation
Of Mathematics (FOM). The Strategy Of Mathematics Is Based
Solely On ‘Senses’, And It Turns Out To Be Also The Study Of
‘Senses’, Including ‘Purposes’.
Strictly Confidential
Page 2
Our Senses : Primitive And Complex
The list of top mathematicians who have worked on foundation of mathematics are given below.
Their works represent breakthroughs in our understanding of ‘how’ and ‘what’ of our ‘thinking or
sensing’ processes.
What these works reveal is that our brains are extremely ‘soft’ and are able to ‘choose’ from even
‘softer’ space-time to achieve our ‘purposes’. The two words ‘soft’ and ‘softer’ and an extra word
‘continuity’ provide us with another view of the origin of Life and at least a perspective to the
philosophical questions of ‘where I come from’, ‘who am I’, and ‘Where I am going’.
On What Basis (Senses)
Platonists
Intuitionists
How To (Mental Actions)
Set Theorists
Logicists
Group Theorists
Category Theorists
System
Formalists
Computing
TOPOS
Strictly Confidential
Lead By
Kurt Godel (1906–1978),
L. E. J. Brouwer (1882–1966)
Lead By
Georg Cantor (1845 –1918)
Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), Bertrand Russell (1872-1970),
Alfred North Whitehead (1861- 1947)
Galois Evariste (1811 –1832), Sophus Lie (1842 – 1899)
Samuel Eilenberg (1913-1998), Saunders MacLane (1909 – 2005)
Lead By
David Hilbert (1862 –1943)
Allan Turing (1912 –1954)
Alexander Grothendieck (1928 –), William Lawvere (1937 - ),
Myles Tierney
Page 3
Sense, Action And Nature (Natural Sciences)
‘Symmetry is ubiquitous. Symmetry has myriad incarnations in the innumerable patterns
designed by nature. It is a key element, often the central or defining theme in art, music,
dance, poetry, or architecture. Symmetry permeates all of science, occupying a prominent
place in chemistry, biology, physiology, and astronomy. Symmetry pervades the inner
world of the structure of matter, the outer world of the cosmos, and the abstract world of
mathematics itself. The basic laws of physics, the most fundamental statements we can
make about nature, are founded upon symmetry’.
Symmetry and The Beautiful Universe, Leon Lederman, 1988 Noble Laureate
Mathematical Representation For Symmetry:
A.(B.C) = (A.B).C
Other conditions like closure, inverse and identity
The limit of symmetry is governed by the limit of the above equation and the related conditions.
However, the foundation of mathematics is more than the above.
Strictly Confidential
Page 4
Sense, Action And Purpose: (Economy, Game)
It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our
dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.
Man is an animal that makes bargains: no other animal does this - no dog exchanges
bones with another.
Adam Smith (1723 -1790)
Economics is not about things and tangible material objects; it is about men, their
meanings and actions
Ludwig Von Mises (1881 -1973)
Economy Links Our Sense, Action, Even Our Languages
To Our Purpose. However, Words Can Make All These
Murky, Causing Serious Personal Or Academic Damages.
For Example
Interest = Purpose
Exchange= Set Of Actions
Economy = System
Meanings = Sense, Purpose, Etc
Theory Of Everything????
Strictly Confidential
Page 5
???
Epistemology And Plastic Words
Languages are designed for different purposes. Common languages are generally not
suitable for Epistemology (Theory Of Everything???). Words can sometimes carry the
exact inverse intention and approach of Epistemology.
‘
‘
It can be beautifully expressed to capture the heart of undiscerning listeners, imitators, and
even the authors themselves with a cloud of hidden agenda to command power, economic
gains and even minds and souls’, as put forward by German writer and linguist Uwe Poerksen
(1935 - ) in his book ‘Plastic Words, The Tyranny Of Modular Languages’.
’
‘Words can easily exploit our age of ‘abstraction’ and ‘over information’ in that the terms sound
scientific to take on an aura of authority while cleverly evading investigation knowing that most
people are not into knowledge foundation, measurement and executables. Each turns
something indefinable into a limitless ideal which triggers a series of needs. These needs then
become self-evident and quickly turn into necessities. Entities indulging in plastic words cleverly
built up an ingenious system for perfect manipulation, gaining power, prestige, market and
selfish benefits. Faithful followers or blind believers, on the other hand, are bewildered
because they have no tools or weapons to tear down these clever deceits.
’
All Mission Critical Works Or Discussions Must Be Wary Of Malleability
Of Languages And Devise A ‘Strategy’ To Counter Its ‘Softness’.
Strictly Confidential
Page 6
Language Shapes Our Thoughts
On 19 Aug, 2004, New Scientists Magazine reported the work of Peter Gordon, the
psychologist at Columbia University on a Brazilian tribe, the Piraha tribe, whose
language does not define numbers above two, or the ‘one, two, many’ language. It
was discovered that they were unable to reliably tell the difference between objects in
a row when the number is as low as four or five. The result provides the strongest
support yet for the so called ‘linguistic determinism’, where Ludwig Wittgenstein was
one of the originators. Gordon says this is the first convincing evidence that a
language lacking words for certain concepts could actually prevent speakers of the
language from understanding those concepts.
Language shapes our thoughts
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951) quote,
‘Language is a part of our organism and no less complicated than it’ ……….‘philosophy is
a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language.’
Strictly Confidential
Page 7
Sense, Action, Purpose And Words (Niels Bohr)
We must be clear that when it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The
poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images and
establishing mental connections.
‘Discussions About Language’ Niels Bohr (1885 – 1962)
Our task is to communicate experience and ideas to others. We must strive continually to
extend the scope of our description, but in such a way that our messages do not thereby lose
their objective or unambiguous character ... We are suspended in language in such a way that
we cannot say what is up and what is down. The word “reality” is also a word, a word which we
must learn to use correctly.
‘Philosophy Of Science’ Niels Bohr
There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract physical description. It is wrong to think
that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about
nature...
"The philosophy of Niels Bohr" by Aage Petersen
Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question.
“A Dictionary Of Scientific Quotation”, Niels Bohr
How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress.
“Niels Bohr: The Man, His Science, & The World They Changed”, Ruth Moore
Strictly Confidential
Page 8
Language Is A Game
‘When we talk of language as a symbolism used in an exact calculus, that which is in our
mind can be found in the sciences and in mathematics. Our ordinary use of a language
conforms to this standard of exactness only in rare cases. Why then do we in
philosophizing constantly compare our use of words with one following exact rules?’
‘In practice we very rarely use language as such a calculus. For not only do we not think
of the rules of usage – of definitions, etc – while using language, but when we are asked
to give such rules, in most cases we aren’t able to do so. We are unable clearly to
circumscribe the concepts we use; not because we don’t know their real definition, but
because there is no real ‘definition’ to them. To suppose that there must be would be like
supposing that whenever children play with a ball they play a game according to strict
rules.’
The Blue Book, (Language As A Game), Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 -1951)
Strategy
Language = A Game
Sense
Purpose
Action
Definition of A Game
Strictly Confidential
Page 9
Everything As A Game
Today, "game theory is a sort of umbrella or 'unified field' theory for the
rational side of social science, where 'social' is interpreted broadly, to include
human as well as non-human players (computers, animals, plants)”
Robert J Aumann, 2005 Nobel Laureate (1930 - )
Why Should Natural Science Be A Game?
Natural sciences depend heavily on mathematics, including its ‘observation’ which is
‘sense based’. Without understanding our own sense, we do not understand our
observations.
On the other hand, if we were to trace the history of mathematics, and call ‘the study of
knowledge’, or Epistemology a human purpose, then we cannot deny that mathematics
is a game, as per our later definition.
Natural sciences, with all the formulas and observations, is therefore a game.
Strictly Confidential
Page 10
A Game
Let’s Do Not Be Confused By Our Past Use Of A Word. It Is Just A
Word, A Piece Within The Whole Game.
A Game
Definition of A Game: A Concept
Encompasses At Least ALL The
Following:
Strategy
Sense
Purpose
Action
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
A Set Of Strategy
A Set Of Actions
A Set Of Choices
A Purpose
Passage Of Time
Set = Collection
A Game Is Partly Something Originally Given, Partly That Which
Develops Freely. Adapted From Soren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855)
Mathematics Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely.
Physics Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely.
Economy Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely.
Etc
Therefore, Theory Of Everything Must At Least Shows What Is Originally Given
Strictly Confidential
Page 11
Axiomatic Set Theory (Study Of ‘Given’)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
What Is The Meaning Of A Word?
Can You Tell Me The Meaning Of ‘Can’?
Is The World Finite Or Infinite?
How Many Points Are There On A Line?
What Is Continuity?
What Is Logic? What Is Higher Order Logic?
What Is A Class Or A Set?
What Is Probability?
Why Has Euclidean Geometry Lasted For
More Than Two Thousand Years?
What Is A Number?
What Is A Real Number?
What Is ‘Order’ and ‘Tuple’?
Does Transfinite Numbers Make Sense?
What Is Relation? What Is Function?
What Is Arithmetic?
What Is Frege’s Logic?
What Is Complete? What Is Incomplete?
What Is Pure?
What Is All?
How Can You Prove That A Proof Is Right?
What Is Direction?
Strictly Confidential
Primitive words {, , !,,, , , ,}
If you sense you can, you can.
Finite, infinite, possibly Infinite
‫א‬1 ?
Senses ? A broken cup filled with water?
Primitive words with/without and TOPOS
A concept, A mathematical game
Arithmetizing of game?
Because we did not know that the world is
round. (The issue of parallel)
10. f, {f}, {f, {f}}, {f, {f}, {f,{f}}}..? Nothing!!!
11. An Ordered 0 and 1? Yi Jing?
12. <a,b> = {a, {a,b}}. Kuratowski Conversion
13. It makes ‘sense’ if numbers are ‘nothing(s)?’.
14. Ordered Tuple, xRy. Function: specific
15. Convert something-ness to nothing-ness
16. {, , !,,, , , }
17. It makes sense, it does not makes sense?
18. ?????????
19. A Paradox (Russell’s Paradox)
20. Never !!!! So, no proof is right.
21. Where our sense point to?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Page 12
Elementary TOPOS (Study Of ‘Given’)

Given
Choice
Symmetry
There Could Be Infinite Ways To Study ‘Given’. Greek Started With ‘Logic’, A Symmetry Of 2.
That Evolved To Axiomatic Set Theory. The Introduction Of ‘Algebra’ By Islamic World Gave
Another View, And That Evolved To ‘Category Theory’ And Higher Symmetry. The Chinese Tried
To Attack ‘Symmetry’ And ‘Category’ At The Same Time, Went No Where. Not Surprising
Because The Unification Was Finally Done Only In Early 1960, By Alexander Grothendieck. It Is
Called A TOPOS, As Shown Above. It Is Just A Concept, Shapes Don’t Count.
Strictly Confidential
Page 13
History of TOPOS And Its Relationship To Language
THEORY C
‘Internal Language’
Internal Language
guarantees that all these can
be programmed
TYPE THEORY
TOPOS
Sheaf
Category
Set
Topology
Group
Non Euclidean Geometry
Algebra
Logic
Euclidean Geometry
Strictly Confidential
Human Language
Page 14
Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory
The discussions until now allow us to relook at Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory. If we were
to read Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory as it is, it will be a tortuous experience. Since so
many assumptions were made, all of which relate to either mathematical or scientific foundation.
If we were to approach from mathematical or scientific foundation, we found that Nash Non
Cooperative Games Theory is a given. It is a paradox. But he was great in that he discovered the
paradox.
Problems of Nash’s Proof:
1.The topic involves ‘senses’, ‘choices’, ‘arithmetic’, ‘languages’, ‘symmetry’, ‘probability’, etc, all
of them foundational topics in science and mathematics.
2.What is the meaning of ‘pure’? What is the meaning of ‘points’?
3.Now that the foundation of science and mathematics is triggered, are the moves in a game
more important than the game itself? Especially when we are trying to understand a game. Even
if the moves are important, but because a ‘tuple’ is not a ‘set’, should we then just assume that a
wrong move is okay? Or should we say, ‘after all’, it is just a game?
4.Now if we further trigger probability, which to me is the arithmetizing of a ‘game’, which is a
game by itself, do we explain a game with a game, especially when one game is contained in
another. For example, the so called ‘Long Tail Theory’ explains that ‘few can be more’, which is
closely related to the fundamental issue of certain transformation from ideal normal distribution to
very bias C² distribution. For the success evident in companies like Google, Amazon.com, does
the success explain the game? This is just like asking a person ‘how did you make it’. It is always
a story. Anyway, we like to listen to stories.
Strictly Confidential
Page 15
Generalizing Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory
It could be easier to prove a generalized Nash Non Cooperative Game Theory, thanks to all the
geniuses of our mathematical and scientific community. As Sir Isaac Newton said, ‘If I have seen
further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants.’ It is important to note that this
is by no means ‘ultimate’, it is just a model, a game. I prefer the word game because it is ‘active’.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Strictly Confidential
Let’s assume that other than our sense and purpose, all things were symmetrical. Let the
physicists prove this assumption.
Symmetry can be both virtual and real. The virtual symmetry is represented by anything that can
be expressed as associative axiom, inclusive of Topology, Group Theory, Category Theory,
Axiomatic Set Theory, etc. (Let the mathematicians and scientists explain this assumption.)
Let’s assert that nobody is perfect, therefore all non perfect cooperation are non cooperative. It
is a matter of degree. In other words, Nash Non Cooperative Games could possibly be
generalized.
Let’s define ‘Rational’ being mathematically valid, irrespective of whether the ‘thinking person’ is
aware or not aware of that status. As Niels Bohr said, ‘you are not thinking, you are just being
logical’.
Borrowing Niels Bohr’s ‘floating thought framework’ concept, let’s assert ‘Elementary Topos’ is
that framework, represents ALL rational thoughts we know today.
All the above are primitive as of today, which means we are able to avoid most paradoxes
discovered until today, whether due to various ‘games’ played, or representation.
Since everything is about a model, let’s see how we can generalize Nash Non Cooperative
Games Theory using elementary TOPOS. In fact, what we had done is to convert the word
‘model’ to ‘game’ by adding ‘sense’, including ‘common sense’ into the ‘model’. In this way, we
convert the ‘non active’ word ‘model’ into ‘game’, which is ‘active’ and matches our sense of our
everyday life, irrespective of what we are doing, whether as a student, linguist, mathematician or
a businessman.
Page 16
Generalized Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory
Primitive
Logic And
Axioms
Given
Axiom Of
Choice
MetaMathematics
That explains various choices of AC, or various foundations for mathematics,
confirming mathematics as an instance of Game.
Strictly Confidential
Page 17
A Game
Science And Economy As A Game
Strategy is a set of
choices inclusive of
actions made using
a previously defined
game
Sense
Sense
Strictly Confidential
Measurements
/Standards/Constants/Theories,
Etc
Various Choices
Of Mathematics
Theoretical
Physics
Various Choices
Of Mathematics
Economic
Models
Page 18
Sciences
Money/Standards/Measurements
, Organization, Etc
Economy
What So Big Deal
Just a hundred years ago, the word ‘success’ was always linked to ‘sense’, ‘purpose’ and
‘strength’, or what we usually called ‘power and relationship’.
However, as the Internet age kicks in, more and more cases of ‘few for more’, or what I
called the phenomenon of ‘probability transformation’ (not probabilistic transformation,
since it is the probability that is being transformed), allowed by the digitization of the
world, starts to flex its muscles. That explains the successes of Apple, Microsoft, Oracle,
Amazon.com, Google, Yahoo, etc.
These ‘successes’ are less about ‘power and relationship’, but more about the foundation
of science and mathematics, appearing as a ‘game’ which very few people understand.
An elementary TOPOS may be diagrammatically very simple, but together with Axiomatic
Set Theory, it is nearly the ‘Theory Of Everything’. Even more importantly, it can be
programmed.
By giving this talk, I hope that some of you will start thinking about : ‘What is probability
transformation?’, and to those who still talk about ‘80-20 rule’ and ‘six sigma’, I would like
to say that the world has moved to ‘one million to one’ rule, and ‘more than twelve sigma’.
This can easily be understood if we can grasp that time-space is ‘relatively soft’, or what
Niels Bohr said, ‘what is real is made of unreal’. An example of ‘real’ could be so called
‘mental block’, an example of ‘unreal’ could be ‘computing’.
Strictly Confidential
Page 19
Quantification And Probability Transformation
(1)
(X.Y).Z = X.(Y.Z)
(Association)
Axiom Of Choice
(Categorical
Commutation)
(2)
Given
Evolution & Change
Symmetry
‘How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought independent
of experience, is so admirably adapted to the objects of reality?’.
Albert Einstein
‘It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one
that is the most adaptable to change (=probability transformation).’
Charles Darwin
Strictly Confidential
Page 20
Silverlake Business
CHOICE DETERMINATION METHOD (CDM)
RULE AND PURPOSE SECTION
(RAPS)
BUSINESS PROCESS
AND STRATEGY ON DEMAND
(BPSOD)
CORE OBJECTS AND PROCESSES (COPS)
SUSTENANCE/MAINTENANCE:
OBJECT PROCESS METHOD (OPM)
Given/
Invisible Hand
The above diagram is an elementary Topos. The model is therefore suitable
for any business, from banks to conglomerates to nations. As our people
get more and more used to my theory, we are expanding into newer and
more profitable territory.
It is unfortunate that we are in the process of patenting the above, and by
patenting rule, we must not demonstrate the solution to public until it is
approved. I hope one day I can come back to demonstrate the solution,
proving that the above can be computerized, and in human terms, that we
can ‘see clearly’ what was discussed.
Strictly Confidential
Page 21
Just The Financial Model Is Mind Boggling
But it is simple to ‘trained’ eyes and minds
REPRESENTATION
Call Centre
Channel
Interaction
Corporate
Desktop
LOGISTICS
JBIS
CORE
Branch Delivery
System
Internet
Banking
Airline
Mobile
Enterprise
System
Banking
Retail Solution
Provident Fund
Passbook
Bond Retail FX
Management
Customer
Printer
Investment & Capital
Insurance
Experience
Customer
Cash
Market
Middleware
Liability
Treasury
Remittance
Deposit Workflow
Service
Automobile
Connectors
Payment
Check
Trade
Management
Clearing &
Connector
Financing
Deposit
Customer
Finance
Settlement
Safe Deposit Loyalty
Marketing
Credit &
Loan
POS & e-POS
Structured
Management
K2
Debit Card
Origination
Business
Cash
Deposit
Workflow
Sales
Device Handler
System
Process
Leasing
Management
Management
Management
Micro Banking Floor
Electronic Banking
Signature
Filenet
Contact
Stocking
Reader
Factoring
Management
Compliance
&
MIS
Dealer
Pin Pad System Management
Reporting
Islamic Banking
Activity
Connector
Financing Document
Biometric
Fraud
Syndication
Management
Money
Imaging
Reader
Management
Changer
Smart
Hire
Connector
Block
Card
Anti Money
Purchase
Performance
Discounting
MIMIX
Reader
Portable
Laundering
Management
Overdraft &
Banking
Asset
Filenet
Human
Aldon
Passbook
Structured Credit
Management
Resource
Printer Self
Management Collection/
Control
M
Documentum
Service
Payroll
Enforcement
SDS
Robot
Connect Direct
ATM
Delivery
Kiosk
Service
Processor
CIF Loan
Deposit
GL
Partial List of Solutions Illustrated
Strictly Confidential
Page 22
What So Big Deal
Quality
Process
Strategy
Accuracy
Reliability
Resilience
Integrity
Auto Document
Validity
Maintainability
Visibility
On Demand
Flexibility
Correctness
Usability
Understandability
Clarity
Testability
Interoperability
New Products
New Services
Command & Control
Creativity
IT As Strategy Not Cost
Leadership
Predictability
Reusability
Rich Functionality
Portability
Continuous Improvement
Cultural Invariance
Generality
Simplicity
Strictly Confidential
Page 23
Economy
Low Cost / Process
Efficient
Effective
Share Price
Winning Quality
Winning Processes
Winning Strategy
New Incomes
One Current Project In China: Cloud Computing
Note 1:
A2A = Application to Application
(G, B, E, F, L, P, C, etc)
Everything Was Designed Based
On Mathematics
Note 2:
The current model of B2B, B2C etc is over simplistic
Strictly Confidential
Page 24
24
Some Philosophical And Social Discussions
Strictly Confidential
Page 25
If Everything Is A Game, What Makes Sense?
If Everything Is A Game, Are We Not Going To Be Even Less God Fearing? No, It Is The
Reverse. In Fact, God Holds A Golden Card (Overriding Even The Ace) In The Game Of
Our Lives. (In Nash’s Paper, That Is The Cause Of Strategies Being ‘Partial’. We Cannot
Play Our Strategies Perfectly.)
What About Our Relationship With Other People? Answer: We Are Going To Be More
Sincere, Because It Is Stupid To Play Game With n Players, Especially When n Is Large. It
Is Not Only Torturing, But Also Least Effective.
So, Focus On Your Strength And Learn What Is ‘Probability Transformation’. It Is ‘Less For
More’, Or What We Called ‘A Better Life’ Or ‘Successes’. But It Is Also Environmentally
Friendly. Life Is No More Just About ‘Power And Political Relationships’.
And Most Importantly, You Find More Meaning And Time In Your Own Life.
Strictly Confidential
Page 26
No Brief History Of Time
Finally, Timing Can Be Everything In Life
If we scan through the whole of mathematics, we find that our strategy is always to limit time
to nearly standing still, an ‘ideal’ approach that allows our sense to be in ‘order’. In other words,
mathematics itself is a ‘non standard analysis’ from ‘time’ perspective.
Since we assume an ideal in time, there can be ‘No Brief History Of Time’ using mathematical
arguments. The argument that we may be able to generalize an ideal to the real situation is
most likely not valid here because ‘we are already generalizing’, and we have yet to discover
the second order or higher order ‘generalization’.
In conclusion, ‘Timing’ is the most uncontrollable issue in our life, as the Chinese
had observed as ‘天时’since ancient time. Since we can sense time, putting extreme
effort in ‘Timing’ is one of the most important strategies for success, and that even
applies to Mathematics.
The following sentence may be difficult to understand, but it is the choice of correct timing that
allows Mesopotamia/Greeks to discover Algebra and Geometry (even if they had borrowed the
idea from somebody else).
Strictly Confidential
Page 27
Chinese Civilization
Chinese Civilization Is Best Summarized By Kong Zi (孔子)
(551 – 479) BC
天何言哉， 四时行矣，万物生矣。天何言哉
‘Tien’ is silent (given), four seasons just keep
rotating, and everything is born out of that.
As Can Be Seen In Many Other Documents, Chinese Culture Originates
From ‘Given’, Though They Appear As Different Words. That Explains
Why Chinese Are So Keen On ‘Strategies’, Since It Is A Natural
Extension Of ‘Given’ As Per TOPOS. In Fact, Most Of Chinese Famous
Phrases Are About Strategies, Whether They Are About Life, Warfare,
Scholarship, Or Whatever.
Strictly Confidential
Page 28
Lao Zi（老子）(600 BC) 道 ‘Tao’ As ‘Given’
道可道， 非常道
If ‘Tao’ (something given) can be explained, then it is not ‘Tao’
道生一， 一生二， 二生三， 三生万物
‘Tao’ gives rise to ‘one’, ‘one gives rise to ‘two’, ‘two’ gives rise
to ‘three’, then ‘three’ results in everything. In Group Theory,
this is called ‘Burnside Theorem’ (1904)
道抱阴而负阳
‘Tao’ finally divides into two, ‘Yin’ and ‘Yang’. Which surprisingly
‘fits’ into Feit Thompson Theorem (1968)
In fact from the above, then everything should appear as ‘sixes’, which in
Physics is known as the ‘Quark Model’, as proposed by Gell-mann Murray and
others in 1964. In Mathematics, it is ‘equals’ to Fisher Theorem (1971).
Strictly Confidential
Page 29
Yi Jing (1182BC) 易经
Literally Translated, Yi Jing Means ‘Book Of Change’. If We Push The Scheme Forward, What
We Get Is Cantor’s Real Number. To Large Extent, That Is Also Equivalent To TOPOLOGY,
something to do with our space/time.
太极
1 两仪
0
0
0
1
1 0
1 四象
0
1 0
1 0
1 八卦
Cantor’s Real Number
Strictly Confidential
Page 30
Eastern And Western Culture
Choice
Given
S2
CHINESE
GREEK
If you look at the above, we can easily conclude that the Westerners do not see something
that the Chinese had easily seen. Just like two hundred years ago, most Chinese did not
see what the Westerners saw. This explains why some Western professors cannot
understand the ‘new’ Chinese economy. In my opinion, unless there is a catastrophe, the
rise of Eastern economies is a given. However, there will be an extremely interesting
interplay of Science and Economy.
Strictly Confidential
Page 31
Mathematics As A Game: Theory Of Everything
As A Conclusion, Mathematics, Like Science, Is Just A Model. It ‘Strategizes’ To
Remove ‘Action’ From The Equation So That Everything Is Played In Our Brains.
However, In Order For Our Brains To ‘Play The Game’, Everything Must Be
Associative, Or In Laymen Terms, Either Geometrical Or Recurrence Or Nearly
Standing Still. That Is, We Limit ‘Time’ Until We Cannot ‘Sense’ It Anymore.
That Does Not Mean Actual Things Behave That Way, Which Explains All The So
Called Paradoxes.
That Highlights To Us That It Is Time To Think About ‘Time’, And As Explained, Brief
History Of Time Is Not About Time. Generalization Is Most Likely Not Valid In This
Case. (Since Generalization Is A Kind Of Direction, Which Can Be Sensed And Is
Already Part Of Our Mathematics. If We Call All Of These ‘Order’, Time Is Most
Likely Something To Do With The Complement Of Order…..Which I Dislike To Use
The Word ‘Disorder’. I Would Rather Use The Word ‘Unknown’.)
While I Do Not Know How To Enter The Research Of Time, I Am However Sure That
That Is The Direction To New Epistemology
Strictly Confidential
Page 32
Kong Zi (孔子)
修身
Do Your Best (One Person Game)
斉家
Manage Your Family (Small Number Game)
治囯
Take Care Of Your People (Medium Number Game)
平天下
Serve Human Race (Large Number Game)
Kong Zi’s Strategy On Success
Strictly Confidential
Page 33
Silverlake Computing Strategy: Unification 天人合一
CHOICE
Unification Is Not As ‘Logical’ As Most People Thought. What They Meant By ‘Logic’ Are At Most
Logic Of Order ‘Two’ Or ‘Three’. It Can Be Easily Proven That TOPOS Has Infinite Logics, That
Makes Us Feel Good When We Look Up Into The Night Sky. It Shows That We Have Yet A Lot
More To Learn, And Most Likely Even After We Die. Currently, Silverlake’s Logic Is Of Order 112,
And It Is Improving Everyday.
Strictly Confidential
Page 34
Apologies
I Was Asked Whether I Can Give A Talk On Behalf Of AAET About Two
Months Ago.
A Talk As Above Is Hard To Be Prepared In Two Months.
If There Is Any Error In My Presentation, I Hope The Audience Will Be Kind
Enough To Let Me Know.
Strictly Confidential
Page 35