Transcript Predicates and Quantified Statements

The Logic of
Quantified Statements
1
Definition of Predicate
 Predicate is a sentence that
 contains finite number of variables;
 becomes a statement when
specific values are substituted
for the variables.
 Ex:  let predicate P(x,y) be “x>2 and x+y=8”
 when x=5 and y=3,
P(5,3) is “5>2 and 5+3=8”
 Domain of a predicate variable is
the set of all possible values of the variable.
 Ex (cont.): D(x)= ; D(y)=R
2
Truth Set of a Predicate
• If P(x) is a predicate and
x has domain D,
then the truth set of P(x) is
all xD such that P(x) is true.
(denoted {xD | P(x)} )
• Ex: P(x) is “5<x<9” and D(x)=Z.
Then {xD | P(x)} ={6, 7, 8}
3
Universal Statement and
Quantifier
Let P(x) be “x should take Math306”;
D={Math majors} be the domain of x.
Then “all Math majors take Math306”
is denoted xD, P(x)
and is called universal statement.
 is called universal quantifier;
expressions for : “for all”, “for arbitrary”,
“for any”, “for each”.
4
Truth and Falsity of Universal
Statements
 Universal statement “xD, P(x)”
 is true iff P(x) is true for every x in D;
 is false iff P(x) is false for at least one x.
(that x is called counterexample)
 Ex: 1) Let D be the set of even integers.
“xD yD, x+y is even” is true.
2) Let D be the set of all NBA players.
“xD, x has a college degree” is false.
Counterexample: Kobe Bryant.
5
Existential Statement and
Quantifier
 Let P(x) be “x(x+2)=24”;
D =Z be the domain of x.
Then
”there is an integer x such that x(x+2)=24”
is denoted “xD, P(x)”
and is called existential statement.
  is called existential quantifier;
expressions for  : “there exists”, “there is a”,
“there is at least one”,
“we can find a”.
6
Truth and Falsity of Existential
Statements
 Existential statement “ xD, P(x)”
 is true iff P(x) is true for at least one x in D;
 is false iff P(x) is false for all x in D.
 Ex: 1) Let D be the set of rational numbers.
“ xD, x 2  2 x  1  0 ” is true.
2) Let D = Z.
“ xD, x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)<0” is false.
Why? Hint: Use proof by division into cases.
7
Negations of Quantified
Statements
The negation of universal statement
“xD, P(x)” is
the existential statement “xD, ~P(x)”
Example: The negation of
“All NBA players have college degree”
is “There is a NBA player
who doesn’t have college degree”.
8
Negations of Quantified
Statements
The negation of existential statement
“ xD, P(x)” is
the universal statement “ xD, ~P(x)”
 Example: The negation of
“ x Z such that x(x+1)<0”
is “ x Z, x(x+1) ≥ 0”.
9
Statements containing multiple
quantifiers
Ex: 1) xR, yZ such that |x-y|<1.
2) For any building x in the city
there is a fire-station y such that
the distance between x and y
is at most 2 miles.
3) xZ such that y[3,5], x<y.
4) There is a student who solved all
the problems of the exam correctly.
10
Truth values of multiply
quantified statements
Ex:  Students = {Joe, Ann, Bob, Dave}
 2 groups of languages:
Asian languages={Japanese,Chinese,Korean};
European languages={French, German,
Italian, Spanish}.
 Joe speaks Italian and French;
Ann speaks German, French and Japanese;
Bob speaks Spanish, Italian and Chinese;
Dave speaks Japanese and Korean.
11
Truth values of multiply
quantified statements
Ex(cont.): Determine truth values of the
following statements:
1)  a student S s.t.  language L,
S speaks L.
2)  a student S s.t. for  language group G
 L in G s.t. S speaks L.
3)  a language group G s.t. for  student S
 L in G s.t. S speaks L.
12
Negating multiply quantified
statements
Example:
2
The negation of “for xR, yR s.t. y  x “
is logically equivalent to
2
“xR s.t. for yR, y  x “.
Generally,
the negation of x, y s.t. P(x,y)
is logically equivalent to
x s.t. y, ~P(x,y)
13
Negating multiply quantified
statements
Example:
The negation of “ xR s.t. yZ, x>y“
is logically equivalent to
“xR yZ s.t. x≤y“.
Generally,
the negation of x s.t. y, P(x,y)
is logically equivalent to
x y s.t. ~P(x,y)
14
The Relation among , , Λ, ν
Let Q(x) be a predicate;
D={x_1, x_2, …, x_n} be the domain of x.
Then
 xD, Q(x) is logically equivalent to
Q(x_1) Λ Q(x_2) Λ … Λ Q(x_n) ;
 xD, Q(x) is logically equivalent to
Q(x_1) ν Q(x_2) ν …
ν Q(x_n) .
15
Universal Conditional Statement
 Definition:  x, if P(x) then Q(x) .
 Example:  undergrad S,
if S takes CS300,
then S has taken CS240.
Negation of universal conditional statement:
 x such that P(x) and ~Q(x)
 Ex(cont.):  undergrad who takes CS300
but hasn’t taken CS240.
16
Variations of universal conditional
statements
Variations of xD, if P(x) then Q(x):
• Contrapositive: xD, if ~Q(x) then ~P(x);
• Converse: xD, if Q(x) then P(x);
• Inverse: xD, if ~P(x) then ~Q(x).
 The original statement is logically equivalent to
its contrapositive.
 Converse is logically equivalent to inverse.
17
Necessary and Sufficient
Conditions
• “x, P(x) is a sufficient condition for
Q(x)”
means “x, if P(x) then Q(x)”
• “x, P(x) is a necessary condition
for Q(x)”
means “x, if Q(x) then P(x)”
18
Validity of Arguments with
Quantified Statements
Argument form is valid means that
for any substitution of the predicates,
if the premises are true,
then the conclusion is also true.
19
Valid Argument Forms:
Universal Instantiation
• x D, P(x);
aD;
P(a).
• If some property is true
for everything in a domain,
then it is true
for any particular thing in the domain.
20
Valid Argument Forms:
Universal Instantiation
Ex: 1) All Italians are good cooks;
Tony is an Italian;
 Tony is a good cook.
2) For x,y R, x  y  ( x  y)( x  y)
74.5, 73.5 R
 74.5 2  73.5 2  (74.5  73.5)(74.5  73.5)
2
2
21
Testing validity by diagrams
• Ex: All integers are rational numbers;
5 is an integer;
 5 is a rational number.
Integers
5
Rational numbers
22
Testing validity by diagrams
• Ex: All logicians are mathematicians;
John is not a mathematician;
 John is not a logician.
Logicians
John
Mathematicians
23
Testing validity by diagrams:
Converse Error
• Ex: All Math majors are taking Math306;
Bill is taking Math306;
 Bill is a Math major.
Math majors
Bill
Math306 class
24