02-Plate-Tectonics

Download Report

Transcript 02-Plate-Tectonics

Earthquake Engineering
GE / CEE - 479/679
Lecture 2. Plate Tectonics
January 24, 2008
John G. Anderson
Professor of Geophysics
January 24, 2008
1
Handout Today
• Chapter 2. Plate Tectonics
– Students are advised to read this as your
textbook on this topic.
– Solve exercises 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
– For extra credit, solve exercises 9, 11.
– Exercises are due Jan. 31.
January 24, 2008
2
Source: Geological Society of America web:
http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.htm
Source: Geological Society of America web:
http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.htm
Crust - rocks (granite, basalt);
density ~ 3 g/cm3
Lithosphere - "rock-sphere" - rigid
layer (includes crust)
Asthenosphere - "weak-sphere"
(lower v seismic waves) Convection
currents flow in the 'plastic'
asthenosphere, and the plates of the
lithosphere ride on these.
Mantle - iron-rich, mainly solid rock
Outer core - liquid iron and nickel
Inner core - solid iron, nickel
Distances are in kilometers.
http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~crawford/PSG/PSG12/204_97_L12.2_earthxn.html
January 24, 2008
5
The radii for the tops
of the major layers
are more accurate on
this plot.
January 24, 2008
6
January 24, 2008
7
http://topex.ucsd.edu/marine_topo/gif_images/global_topo_small.gif
January 24, 2008
9
http://www2.ocean.washington.edu/oc540/lec02-1/
January 24, 2008
10
http://www2.ocean.washington.edu/oc540/lec02-1/
January 24, 2008
11
Why believe plate tectonics?
• Geography - matching continental boundaries.
• Geology - units match where continental
boundaries match.
• Paleomagnetism
–
–
–
–
Characteristics of the magnetic field
Polar wander
Mid-ocean ridge magnetic anomalies.
Past and future Earth.
January 24, 2008
12
Why believe plate tectonics?
•
•
•
•
Ocean drilling results.
Hot spots
Earthquakes
Direct measurements
January 24, 2008
13
January 24, 2008
14
January 24, 2008
15
January 24, 2008
16
January 24, 2008
17
January 24, 2008
19
January 24, 2008
22
January 24, 2008
24
January 24, 2008
25
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/fliers/96mgg04.html
January 24, 2008
28
January 24, 2008
30
Direct measurement using
the Global Position System
January 24, 2008
31
Engineering applications
• Context to understand seismicity
• Quantitative estimate of earthquake rates
• Seismic gaps
January 24, 2008
34
Distance between two points on the Earth’s surface
cos   sin  sin  1  cos  cos  1 cos(   1 )
Where:
(φ, ψ) = (latitude, longitude) of selected point on plate boundary
(φ1, ψ1) = (latitude, longitude) of pole of relative rotation
January 24, 2008
35
January 24, 2008
36
u   a sin 
u = relative rate of plate motion
a = radius of Earth, 6370 km
Δ = distance from pole of rotation, in degrees
ω = rotation rate of plates about their pole
(a different use of the symbol ω)
January 24, 2008
38

deg   radians  6 my 
 5 cm 
o








u   0.98
10
6370
km
10
sin
77



 180 deg 

my
y
km






 
January 24, 2008
39
Seismic Moment
• Definition of Seismic Moment
• M0=μAD
– μ is the shear modulus of the rock
– A is the area of the fault on which slip takes
place
– D is the average slip on the fault
January 24, 2008
41
Application to Japan
• Accept for the time that the plates in Japan
converge at u=10.6 cm/yr.
– This is a horizontal convergence rate.
– .
• The last large earthquake at Tokyo was 1923.
– Time past is (2005-1923)=84 years.
• Then accumulated slip is:
– 10.6 cm/yr*82 yr=890 cm.
January 24, 2008
42
Application to Japan (cont.)
• Then accumulated slip is:
– 10.6 cm/yr*82 yr=890 cm.
• Suppose the fault is 200 km long and the
seismogenic zone is from 0 to 30 km depth.
– The subduction zone dips, lets say at 40o
– Width = 30 km/cos(dip)=40 km
• M0=μAD
= 4*1011 dyne/cm2 * 200 km * 40 km * (105 cm/km)2 *
890 cm
= 2.8 * 1028 dyne-cm
January 24, 2008
43
Moment Magnitude
• MW=(2/3) log M0-10.73
• This is the preferred magnitude scale in the
seismological community.
January 24, 2008
44
Application to Japan (cont.)
• M0=μAD
=2.8 * 1028 dyne-cm
MW=(2/3) log M0-10.73
=8.24
Conclusion, by these assumptions, there is
enough strain accumulated to cause a
MW=8.2 earthquake under Tokyo.
January 24, 2008
45