Transcript (fig 1).

P079: Crustal Structure using the tomography method, in the central part
of Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL).
Panayotopoulos Yannis
1,
Hirata Naoshi
1,
Takeda Tetsuya
2,
Kato Aitaro
1,
1,
1
Kurashimo Eiji Iwasaki Takaya
1: ERI, Univ. Tokyo, 2: NIED Institute
3. Data
1. Introduction
The central part of the Itoigawa-Sizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL) plays a crucial role in understanding the tectonic
evolution of the ISTL fault system (fig 1). During the Pliocene the ISTL has been reactivated as a reverse fault due
to tectonic inversion after the collision of the Izu-Bonin arc with the Japanese arc, with the northern part of ISTL
behaving as a low angle east dipping thrust fault and the southern-central part as a west dipping thrust fault. The
northern and central parts of the ISTL have a slip rate of 4 - 6 mm/yr and 1.3 – 2.5 mm/yr, respectively, while the
southern part is considered to have ceased its activity.
The double-difference tomography method (Zhang & Thurber, 2003) was applied to 89
earthquakes and 2 vibroseis shots in the central part of ISTL (fig 3). Many of these events
have not been located by the JMA, and were estimated using our temporary stations. We
have obtained 4376 P and 3687 S wave arrival time data, picked at 79 stations.
2. Observation
Fig.3) Events used for the inversion. We analyzed
earthquakes from 2003/09/02 to 2003/10/13.
Fig.4) Grid node distribution.
The nodes were set with a
spacing of 3 km along the X
direction, 10 km along Y and at
depths of 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30
km. All the results we present
on this poster are from the
middle cross-section.
We deployed a temporary network for a 2 month period from 25 August to 16 October 2003; consisting of 49
linear array stations cutting across the ISTL fault trace and 9 stations scattered in the surrounding area (fig 2). We
used 3-component 1-Hz seismometers and long-term recorders with a sampling rate of 100 Hz. Using our
temporary network and the permanent network in this area deployed by the Japanese Meteorological Agency
(JMA), the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) and the Earthquake
Research Institute, the University of Tokyo, we determined several local events. We analysed these events to locate
and reveal the velocity structure across the ISTL, and connect them with seismic activity which may be related to
present time movements of the fault system.
4. Analysis
We calculate the Vp, and Vs values at nodes of a 3D grid,
with 19 x 5 x 12 nodes at
XYZ directions respectively (fig 4). We first run a set of calculations using only the events
published in the JMA catalogue (67) and next using all the events we have picked. For
both cases, we run a checkerboard resolution test in order to locate the areas with
sufficient resolution (fig 5). By adding the local micro-earthquakes into our dataset, we
were able to achieve better resolution for shallow depths and also to expand to an area
with better resolution towards the deeper parts of the crust.
I.S.T.L
Initial velocity model perturbations
Mt. Fuji 
Fig. 1 ) Geological map of the surveyed area.
Fig 2) Seismic stations used in this
study. Blue stars: temporary network.
Black stars: local network in the area
5. Results
During the inversion, the P rms residuals drop from an initial 0.29 s to 0.11 s after 12 iterations. The relocated
events near our station array appear to be approximately 3 km shallower than the initial JMA catalogue
hypocenter (fig 6).
In the Vp cross-section we image 2 areas with low Vp at the Northeast and Central parts (fig 7). We have
achieved good P wave resolution at 0-13 Km depths for a 32 Km long area of the cross-section. Again we compare
the results using only the JMA catalogue events and both JMA and local.
Fig.6)
Event
distribution
relocated by the DD tomography
method. Green lines displays the
sift of the hypocenters from the
initial JMA catalog to that of the
relocated determination. The
relocated events appear to be ~3
km shallower than those by the
JMA catalog.
With blue color we display
the local micro-earthquakes that
are not reported by the JMA
catalog but have been determined
by our temporary array network
data.
Fig.7) DD tomography results using only the JMA catalog events (left) and those with
both JMA and local micro-earthquake events (right). An area with low Vp can be
identified at the northeastern part of the cross-section. In addition Vp displays low
values to a depth of 7 km at the center of the cross-section. Vs seems to follow the
same patterns as Vp. A low Vp/Vs area can be clearly seen in the eastern part of the
cross-section.
Vp with JMA events only
Vs with JMA events only
Vp resolution with JMA events only
Vp resolution with JMA & local events
Vs resolution with JMA events only
Vs resolution with JMA & local events
Fig.5) Checkerboard resolution test results: (left) inversion using only the JMA catalog events and (right) that with
both JMA and local micro-earthquake events.
Vp with JMA & local events
Vs with JMA & local events
6. Discussion
Our cross-section runs through 3 different geological
units. The Palaeozoic-Mesozoic accretionary prism units
to the southwest (Ryoke belt), the Triassic-Tertiary
accretionary units in the centre (Chichibu-Shimanto
belts) and the Yatsugatake volcano depositions to the
northeast (fig 8). The low Vp area to the east can be
attributed to the Yatsugatake volcano depositions, wile
the low Vp/Vs zone is an indication of magmatic
processes (fig 10).
The relatively low Vp values in the centre of the cross
section can be identified as the accretionary prism units
of the Japanese arc (mostly flysch, shale and chert).
Below that lies a high Vp area that represents the IzuBonin arc rocks (fig 10). The seismicity in the area is not
suficient to trace the downwards evolution of the ISTL
faul trace. Nevertheless, we believe that it represents the
boundary between the accretionary prism units and the
Izu-Bonin arc sequences.
Fig 8) Major geological units in the area.
Ryoke belt: Granitic rocks. Simanto belt:
flysch, shale and chert. Chichibu belt:
pillow basalt, reef limestone radiolarian
chert. Yatsugatake volcano: Volcanic tuffs.
ISTL
b
Vp/Vs with JMA events only
Vp/Vs with JMA & local events
7. Conclusion
a
Yatsugatake Volcano
Chichibu Belt
Ryoke Belt
Shimanto Belt
Fig 9) Vp cross-section in the
central ISTL. Two areas with
low Vp can be identified in
the cross-section. We can
correlate these two areas with
the Yatsugatake volcano
depositions to the east (a) and
the marginal depositions of
the Japanese arc accretionary
prism in the center (b). The
deeper extension of the
central ISTL is denoted by a
broken line, estimeted by a
reflection survey carried by
Ikeda et al. 2004.
We have conducted a temporary network array survey in the central part
of ISTL from 2003/08/25 to 10/16. We have combined our stations with the
routine network in the area in order to accurately estimate the local seismicity.
We have processed these events according to the DD tomography method and
estimated the crustal velocity structure in the area.
The DD relocated hypocenters are shallower than those estimated by the JMA, because we take in account the
lateral heterogeneities in the crust. In the central ISTL the extension of the local fault (Aoyagi fault) seems to be the
boundary between the accretionary prism units and the Izu-Bonin arc sequences. The seismicity at the present is not
directly related with fault activity in the studied area, because it lies deeper than the deepest extetion of the ISTL.