Transcript Chapter 17: Plate Tectonics

Chapter 17: Plate Tectonics
• 17.1 – Drifting Continents
• Objectives
 Identify the lines of evidence that led Alfred Wegener to suggest that
Earth’s continents have moved
 Discuss how evidence of ancient climates supported continental drift
 Explain why continental drift was not accepted when it was first proposed
Main Idea: The shape and geology of the continents
suggests that they were once joined together
Pre-conceptions
• What does the phrase “plate tectonics” mean
to you?
• How about the phrase “continental drift”?
Any different from “plate tectonics”?
“It’s just a theory”
• What is a scientific theory and what is it about a
theory that makes it a good theory?
 Must be built upon evidence and hypotheses (reasoning & logical connections between
the 2)
 Must be testable and held accountable during intense scrutiny (theories can be proven
wrong by experiment or observation; wrong theories get modified, discarded, or
replaced completely)
 No theory is ever proven
 Different from “laws” in that theories are a natural explanation of why a certain
phenomenon happens while laws indicate what will happen
Examples of common scientific theories:
1.) Gravitational theory
2.) Einstein’s theory of relativity
3.) Germ theory of disease
4.) Cell theory of organisms
5.) Valence theory of chemical compounds
6.) Theories of evolution in biology, geology, and astronomy
Early Observations of Earth’s Geologic
Past
• Earth’s surface appeared to remain relatively
unchanged during the course of a human lifetime
 With the exception of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and landslides
• Early cartographers (those who study and practice making
maps) in 1500s noticed the apparent fit of continents on
either side of the Atlantic Ocean
• Proposed that N. America & S.
America had been separated from
Europe and Africa by earthquakes
and floods
• First evidence of “jigsaw fit” from
scientists like Francis Bacon (1620)
• Frances Placet (1668) continents
were actually fixed together and
had been torn apart by the biblical
flood
1915: The Origin of the Continents and
Oceans
• Alfred Wegener
 1st time idea of moving continents was proposed as a real scientific hypothesis
• Wegener’s Idea: Continental Drift
 Earth’s continents had once been joined in a single landmass, a supercontinent
called Pangaea, that broke apart about 200 million years ago and sent continents
adrift
 Wegener was 1st to base his ideas on more than just puzzle-like fit of continental
coastlines….that was just the beginning
 Wegener collected and organized rock, climatic, and fossil data to support his
hypothesis
Wegener was a German scientists who was
a well-known explorer and spent his
profession in meteorology (study of the
atmosphere) and astronomy
Who is this wise guy?
• At the time of Wegener’s hypothesis, there
were 2 competing hypotheses about Earth’s
ancient geography
1.) Biologists & Paleontologists suggested that Earth’s continents were once
connected by land bridges that later sank beneath the oceans
2.) Geophysicists stated that isostatic principles made it impossible for land
bridges to sink into oceanic crust
 Both groups firmly believed in the theory of permanence, that oceans
basins and continents were permanent, unchanging features
 Wegener proposed that the biological & geophysical evidence would agree
if Earth’s continents had changed positions over time
Evidence From Rock Formations
• Let’s see if you can reach Wegener’s
conclusion regarding rocks
 IF there was this supercontinent, Pangaea, AND it broke apart, THEN…..
 Large geologic structures, such as mountain ranges, that fractured as the
continents separated should show areas of similar rock types on opposite
sides of the Atlantic Ocean
Sure enough…
 Many layers of rocks in the Appalachian Mountains in the US were
identical to layers of rocks in similar mountains in Greenland and Europe
 These similar groups of rocks, older than 200 million years, supported
Wegener’s idea
 So far….so good
Similar Rock Types
Evidence From Fossils
• How do you think fossils would help Wegener’s idea?
 Similar fossils of animals & plants that once lived on or near land had been
found on widely separated continents
 Animals such as Cynognathus and Lystrasourus could not have swum the
great distances that now exist between
 In addition, fossils from Mesosaurus, an aquatic reptile, had been found
only in freshwater rocks; therefore it was unlikely that this species could
have crossed the oceans
 Ages of these fossils also predated Wegener’s time frame for the breakup
of Pangaea…..supporting his hypothesis
Climatic Evidence
• Wegener’s strong background in meteorology
helped him recognize clues about ancient
climates from fossils he studied
 Fossils of the plant Glossopteris had been found on many parts of the
Earth, including South America, Antarctica, and India
 Wegener reasoned that the area separating these fossils was too large to
have had a single climate
 In addition, he knew that because Glossopteris grew in temperate
climates, the places where these fossils had been found were once closer
to the equator
How did coal end up in Antarctica?
• Coal forms from the compaction and decomposition of
accumulations of ancient swamp plants
• Wegener used the existence of coal beds in Antarctica to
conclude that Antarctica must have been much closer to the
equator at some point
There was ice where???
• Glacial deposits nearly 300 million years old were on several continents
• Because the traces of the ancient ice caps were found in regions where it
is too warm (Africa, India, Australia, and S. America), Wegener proposed
that they were once located near the South Pole
Wegener suggested 2 possibilities for this:
1.) Earth’s axis changed so that the south pole had shifted its position
2.) These landmasses had once been closer to the south pole
 The 2nd suggestion seemed much more likely
Sorry Buddy…..
A rejected notion:
 Although Wegener had compiled an impressive collection of data,
the hypothesis of continental drift was never accepted by the
scientific community mainly because of 2 unanswered questions:
1.) What forces could cause the movement?
 Wegener thought that the rotation of the Earth might be responsible until
physicists came along and ruled that out….
2.) How could continents move through solids?
 Wegener had suggested that continents were plowing through a stationary
ocean floor, but it was known that Earth’s mantle below the crust was solid
Though there were other reasons, these 2 questions were the main
reasons why Wegener’s theory of continental drift was rejected
So why did I just tell you all this stuff if
it wasn’t accepted???
• Good things come with time ;)
 Wasn’t until the 1960s when new technology revealed more
evidence about how continents move that scientists began to
reconsider Wegener’s ideas
 Advances in sea floor mapping and in understanding Earth’s
magnetic field provided the necessary evidence to show how
continents move, and the source of the forces involved….as
we will see later!