Transcript Biological

Denise L. Daggett, MS, CIH
The Scripps Research Institute
[email protected]
Case Study Outline

The Scene

The Situation

The “Resolution”

Results and Lessons Learned

Outrage Control
The Scene:
The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI)

Academic research

> Million square feet
of lab and office space

13 lab buildings

~500 fume hoods

100% fresh air
What is that smell?
How It All Began


Late 2005
Reports of odors in our
large chemistry building
 Musty
 Grandma’s attic
 Wet dog, wet burlap, wet
money
 Locker room
Isolated to a couple of
labs
 Occurred around midday
 Worsened through the
winter months
 Disappeared in April

Symptoms
Eye irritation
 Upper respiratory irritation
 Taste in mouth
 Headaches
 Nausea
 Mild to severe responses

Approached as an Indoor Air
Quality Project
Interviews
 Questionnaires
 Odor logs and phone calls to notify
 Air sampling
 Outrage escalated each time an episode
occurred
 Brought in consultants
 Offered medical evaluations with our
Occupational Medicine Physician

Additional Complaints
In 2008, occupants in another lab
building reported same condition
 Always in the cooler months
 Same time of day
 Occupants would point to certain supply
grills as the source
 Some of our neighboring companies and
institutions were experiencing the same
problems

Pinpointing Origin




During an episode
Entered the air
handler unit (AHU)
feeding the lab
Odor present and
very strong
Ah-Ha moment
Fact Finding and Data
Fact Finding


Searched the literature
Condition described as Dirty Sock Syndrome
 Small HVAC units (cars)
 Residential units
 Large AHUs (sport arenas)


Odor due to bacteria and mold growth on the
coils
Employees want to know
 What the odor is
 What is flying through the air

No description of the actual chemical
composition
The Experts

Spoke to:
 Harvard researcher – mainly bacteria with a
biofilm, odor is metabolites from mainly bacteria
 Houston engineer – salts, dirt, and microbial
material
 Montana State University – bacteria with a
biofilm
 TSRI Occupational Medicine Physician – typical
indoor air quality symptoms, likely will not cause
permanent harm
 What is a biofilm?
Biofilm
forms when bacteria
adhere to surfaces in
aqueous environments
and excrete a slimy, gluelike substance
 can be formed by a single
bacterial species, but more
often consist of many
species, debris and
corrosion products
 Other examples: plaque on
teeth, slime on pet
feed/water bowls

Information and figure courtesy of
the Center of Biofilm Engineering,
Montana State University
Sampling in an Air Handling Unit
Working Theories about
Causation
Chemical
Oxidized metal
Salts
Moisture
Debris from fires
Other debris
Biological
Bacteria w/ biofilm
Mold
Protozoa
Biological and Chemical
Sampling and Data: Chemical
Method/Comments
Results
MIRAN: unknown sample pulled CO2 and acetone
into instrument cell and
qualitative analysis against
library
SUMMA Canisters: taken inside ppb levels of lab solvents:
AHU & lab, EPA TO-15 analysis acetone, chloromethane,
methylene chloride, toluene
Sampling and Data: Biological
Method/Comments
Results
Air-o-Cells: indoors compared to Very low counts of
outside
Aspergillus/Penicillium types and
Cladosporium, Basidoiospores
Swab samples
Bacterial: Moderate to high counts
Bacillus species
Gram + and – rods, Gram +
Cocci
Fungal: low counts
Cladosporium, Aureobasidium
Exophiala, Acrodontium
Scrapings from inside air handler: No biologicals: high salts, metal
looked like mold
oxides, and dirt
Biocassette samples: bacteria
No viable bacteria
and mold, taken inside the air
No viable fungi
handler
Likely Not One or the Other but
Both
Chemical
Biological
Dew Point plays a role: When coil is damp, odor occurs. Is
the smell from a wet coil (like wet pavement) or moistened
biofilm?
What Now? Clean the Coils
Date
Action
Coil Position
April 2009
Low pressure rinse, mild bleach
solution, then rinse
Removed hot
and cold coils
January 2010 Water rinse, application of an EPAapproved coil cleaning product, then
rinse
Remained in
place
February
2010
Cross plumbed hot water to cold coil, Remained in
heated it up to 180 F, then application place
of coil cleaning product, then rinsed
March 2010
Heated up cold coil, low pressure
spray down, steam application, the
use of a different EPA-approved
biocidal material, then rinsed
Remained in
place
Did the Cleaning Work?

First cleaning
occurred in April
2009
 A few odor
complaints, then gone
for several months
 Back in autumn

Outrage of
occupants continues
to simmer
Managing the Outrage





One-on-one
conversations
Town hall-style
meeting
Angry letters and
conversations
Back to one-on-one
conversations to key
individuals
Technical summit
The Future





As predicted the odor
dissipated for the
summer
Odor will return
Back to experts again:
RFP issued Oct 2010
Bringing in
experienced
personnel
Treatment needs to
be ongoing
One Path - UV




After 2009 cleaning,
a UV system was
installed
No benefit noted
2010: a better
designed UV system
installed
Benefit remains to
be seen
Questions?
Biofilm and Biocide Clip
http://www.erc.montana.edu/Res-Lib99SW/Movies/2005/05-M005.htm
http://www.erc.montana.edu/default.htm
This is a computer model simulation in which the hypothetical persister
protection mechanism is active. Biofilm formation begins with the
development of independent cell clusters that merge over time. An
antimicrobial treatment initiated at 100 hours rapidly kills most of the
live cells, but persister cells survive. When the persister cells
eventually resuscitate, they give rise to new growth that begins in
clonal pockets but rapidly extends throughout the biofilm.
Movie Authors: J.D. Chambless, P.S. Stewart, S.M. Hunt
Reference: Chambless, J.D., Hunt, S.M., and Stewart, P.S. 2006. A Three-Dimensional Computer Model of Four Hypothetical Mechanisms
Protecting Biofilms from Antimicrobials. Applied and Environmental Engineering, 72(3):2005-2013.