COLON CANCER - Oncology Hematology Associates
Download
Report
Transcript COLON CANCER - Oncology Hematology Associates
COLON CANCER
Thomas M. Waits, M.D.
2017
1
135,000 new cases each year in U.S.
50,000 will end up dying of their disease
One of 17 people develop colon cancer
Associated with a low fiber, high fat diet
Can be detected with proper screening
2
Inherited Disorders
TYPE
Familial adenomatous
polyposis
Hereditary nonpolyposis syndrome
RISK OF COLON
CANCER
Very High
Very High
OTHER CANCERS
Stomach, thyroid and
adrenal
Uterine, stomach and
bladder
3
Inherited Disorders (cont’d)
70% of cases are sporadic or random
20% have a first degree relative with a history of
colon cancer but not a defined inheritable
syndrome
10% are part of an inherited disorder either due
to the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or
the hereditary non-polyposis (HNPCPC)
syndromes.
4
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Usually associated with hundreds if not thousands
of polyps throughout the colon.
Autosomal dominant.
Screening colonoscopy begins at age 10-12.
Prophylactic colectomy is almost always advocated.
5
Hereditary Non-Polyposis Syndrome
Lynch I Syndrome
Most patients are young, average in their early 40’s.
Right sided colon cancer much more common than
left sided colon cancer.
Frequently have synchronous colon cancers.
6
Hereditary Non-Polyposis Syndrome
Lynch II Syndrome
Also young patients with right sided colon cancers.
Other cancers such as uterine and ovary cancer are
common.
Also sometimes seen but less common include
tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and urinary
tract.
Screening of these patients usually begins at age 25.
7
8
Suppressor Genes in Colon
Cancer
Suppressor genes responsible for fixing
mutations, DNA mismatches that can lead to
tumor development
Loss of chromosome 18 found in many
HNPCC patients and 15-20% of sporadic
colon cancer cases
9
Risk Factors
Diet
Low fiber, high fat
High fiber intake can reduce the risk by 1/3
Family History
First degree relative increases the risk by 2-3x
75% of colon cancer occur in those without a family
history
10
Risk Factors (cont’d)
Ulcerative Colitis
Form of inflammatory bowel disease
Degree of risk is dependent upon
a) duration of disease
b) amount of colon involvement
Aspirin
One aspirin per day decreases the risk
Actually can cause regression of tumors
Can lead to earlier detection
11
Screening of Colon Cancer
Age 50-beyond- annual fecal occult blood
testing of the stool is recommended.
Age 50-beyond-colonoscopy is recommended at
age 50 and then every 10 years depending on
history and findings.
*Mortality from colon cancer is reduced by 30-40% by
fecal occult blood testing.
12
Common Presenting Symptoms
Constipation
Diarrhea
Blood loss
Acute - dark or maroon-colored stools with a normocytic
normochromic anemia
Chronic - hemoccult positive stools with a microcytic
hypochromic anemia due to iron deficiency
Abdominal pain – chronic or acute
13
Common Presenting Symptoms
(cont’d)
Acute - may mimic appendicitis
Usually due to obstruction
Chronic - may be present for months prior to
the diagnosis
14
Diagnostic Tests
Colonoscopy with biopsy - 95-99% sensitive
Barium enema – only done if patient could not
tolerate or complete colonoscopy
15
Pre-cancerous Lesions
Polyps
Three types
Tubular (low malignant potential)
Tubulovillous (intermediate)
Villous (high malignant potential)
Worrisome features
>2 cm
Severe epithelial dysplasia
Villous type
16
Polyps
Treatment
Usually removal via the “snare technique” during
colonoscopy is adequate
Deeper invasion may require surgical resection
Following resection, yearly colonoscopy is
important
17
Diagnostic Preoperative Evaluation
Complete colonoscopy - 3-5% of patients will
have a synchronous lesion (biopsy obtained)
CXR
CT abdomen
CEA
18
Surgical Treatment
Methods
End to end anastomosis
Abdominoperineal resection
Important components of surgery
Removal of the malignancy and adjacent bowel
(5 cm margin if possible)
Removal of adjacent lymph nodes
Inspection of the liver
19
Laparoscopic Colon Resection
Cure rates and benefits are equivalent to open
resection
Cannot be used in rectal and transverse colon
cancers
20 – 25% of cases are converted to an open
resection
20
Laparoscopic Colon Resection
Benefits
Less postoperative pain
More rapid return of bowel function
Shorter duration of hospitalization and recovery
period
21
Spread of Colon Cancer
Laterally in the colon
Lymphatic spread to adjacent intra-abdominal
lymph nodes
Hematogenous spread with the liver being the
most common metastatic site and lungs second
22
Staging System
TNM System
T1 - invades the submucosa
T2 - invades the muscularis propria
T3 - invades the serosa
T4 - extends through the serosa into free
peritoneal air or invades adjacent organs (vagina,
prostate, ureters, kidney)
23
Staging System (cont’d)
N0 - no lymph nodes involved
N1 - 1-3 lymph nodes involved
N2 - 4 or more lymph nodes involved
M0 - no distant metastasis
M1 - distant metastasis present
24
Prognostic Factors
Extent of bowel wall involvement (T)
Extent of lymph node involvement (N)
Presence of metastatic disease (M)
25
Staging Systems and Survival
AJCC
Dukes
5 year survival
T1, N0, M0
T2, N0, M0
I
A
>90%
T3, N0, M0
II
B
75-80%
Any T, N1-3
T4, N0, M0
III
C
40-55%
Any T, Any N, M1
IV
D
10-20%
Number of nodes involved is inversely proportional to
the 5 year survival rate
26
27
28
29
Treatment for Colon Cancer
Stage I - surgery only
Stage II – surgery only vs adjuvant chemotherapy
Stage III and IV - surgery followed by
chemotherapy
May delay or forgo surgery in stage IV patients if
there is no obstruction or significant bleeding
30
Stage II Colon Cancer- Negative
Prognostic Factors
T4 tumor
Poorly Differentiated histology
Lymphovascular invasion
pMMR tumors ( dMMR = better prognosis )
Perforation
Less than 12 lymph nodes sampled
31
Chemotherapy
Stage II
Preferred treatment is 5FU + Leucovorin ( oral
xeloda can be substituted for IV 5FU )
Treatment duration is 6 months
Benefit is a 5% reduction in recurrence
Toxicity: Diarrhea, mucositis, weakness, fatigue
32
Chemotherapy
Stage III
Standard is Oxaliplatin, 5FU and leucovrin
Treatment duration is 6 months
Each treatment is 48 hours continuous every
other week ( 12 treatments )
Benefit: improvement in 5 year survival of 15%
Toxicity: neuropathy, myelosuppression,
diarrhea, mucositis, fatigue
33
Chemotherapy Stage IV
FOLFOX plus Avastin
Same FOLFOX regimen plus Avastin (a vascular
endothelial GF inhibitor)
Toxicity: Hypertension, bleeding , proteinuria
34
Other forms of Chemotherapy
Camptosar – inhibits topoisomerase I
Typically used with 5-FU and Leucovorin because
the response rate is higher in combination with
these agents.
The regimen is similar to that for FOLFOX. This
regimen is called FOLFIRI and the only difference
is the Camptosar is given instead of the
Oxaliplatin.
35
Other forms of Chemotherapy
(cont.)
FOLFIRI
Side effects – usually more diarrhea, hair loss, and
myelosuppression than FOLFOX but no
neuropathy or cold intolerance.
36
Targeted Therapies in Colorectal
Cancer
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Regorafenib (Stivarga)
EGFR Targeting Agents
Cetuximab (Erbitux)
Panitumumab (Vectibix)
37
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Angiogenesis or development of new blood
vessels is necessary to facilitate tumor growth.
Avastin is a monoclonal antibody that binds to
and inhibits the activity of a substance known as
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
Specifically prevents the interaction of VEGF
interacting on the surface of endothelial cells
and exerting its effect.
38
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Several studies using various forms of
chemotherapy plus Avastin show a benefit.
Presence of Avastin improves the response rate
by 10% to approximately 50% and overall
survival rate by 16 to 21 months in patients with
metastatic disease.
39
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Dose – 5 mg/kg given over 2 hours on an every
two-week basis.
Given the same day as chemotherapy.
Given over 30-60 minutes
40
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Toxicity
Should not be given within 4-6 weeks of surgery
as it may initiate bleeding episodes.
Can cause acceleration of hypertension.
Can cause proteinuria but rarely causes a
nephrotic syndrome.
41
Regorafenib (Stivarga)
Only oral VEGF inhibitor
Response rate only 1% but improved survival
from 5 months to 6.4 months
Dose: 160 mg orally 3 out of 4 weeks
Side effects: liver toxicity, rash, proteinuria,
hypertension and fatigue
42
Trifluridine/Tipiracil ( Lonsurf )
Oral oncolytic agent
Combined therapy: nucleoside metabolic
inhibitor ( trifluridine ) and a thymidine
phosphorylase inhibitor ( tipiracil )
Basically the tipracil decreases metabolism of the
trifluridine increasing its bioavailability.
Given orally days 1-5 & 8-12 every 4 weeks
Toxicity: myelosuppression , diarrhea
43
Erbitux
Binds to the human epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR).
Access to the EGFR by tumor produced
substances is necessary for tumor growth.
Approved for use in patients who are
Camptosar refractory or intolerant.
44
Erbitux
In conjunction with Camptosar, response rate is
increased to 25%.
Monotherapy with Erbitux produces response
rates of 10-15%.
45
Erbitux
Dose: First week it is 400mg per metered sq
over 2 hours.
Given weekly thereafter at 250mg per metered
sq over 1 hour.
46
Erbitux
Toxicity
Main toxicity is a nonseparative acneform rash
present in about 35% of patients.
Allergic reaction: anaphylaxis in approximately 1%
Other Toxicities
Diarrhea 20% nausea, 15% weakness 20%
47
Vectibix
•
•
•
Similar to erbitux- binds to EGFR
Used alone or in combination with
chemotherapy
Main toxicities: acneform rash and occasional
diarrhea but no allergic/anaphylaxis reactions
48
Rectal Cancer
Risk factors, staging and prognosis identical to
colon cancer
40,000 cases per year in the U.S.
Treatment identical as well except:
1) Surgery often results in a colostomy
(abdominoperineal resection)
2) Radiation therapy is required in the treatment of
stage II and III patients
49
Anal Cancer
<2000 cases per year
More common in women than men
Associated with the human papilloma virus
Most common symptom: pain in the anal region
50
Treatment
Chemotherapy
Mitomycin C, Day 1
5FU via 24 hour infusion, Days 1-4 and 29-32
Radiation Therapy
Daily M-F for 5 weeks
51
Side Effects
Radiation dermatitis
Myelosuppression
Diarrhea
Anal strictures
52
Cure Rate
Tumors <3 cm = 85-90%
Tumors >3 cm = 70%
Much better than surgery alone
53
CANCER STAGING
AND
DIAGNOSTICS
Thomas M. Waits, M.D.
2017
54
Cancer Staging and Diagnostics
Staging of cancer
Enhances ability to compare different treatments
Enables the physician to accurately choose the
optimal therapy
Furnishes prognostic information
55
Staging System and
Nomenclature
AJCC (American Joint Committee on
Cancer)
System is the most widely utilized
The AJCC uses the TNM System
T = size and extent of the tumor
N = presence and extent of lymph node
involvement
M = presence of metastatic spread
56
Components of Staging
Radiology
Plain radiographs including chest x-ray
Computed tomography (CT)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Positron emission tomography (PET)
57
Components of Staging
(continued)
Procedural testing
Endoscopy
Bone marrow exam
Surgical biopsies
Fine needle aspiration
Endoscopic ultrasound
58
Mammography
Screening mammography
No history of breast cancer
Begins at age 40
Recommended annually ( or every 2 years; or begin at 45)
Diagnostic mammography
Utilized when a suspicious lump is noted on screening
mammography
Uses spot compression, increased magnification and breast
ultrasound technique
59
Suspicious Findings on
Mammography
Clustering of calcium deposits
Heterogeneous in shape and size
60
Breast Ultrasound
Not utilized in screening ( discerns solid from
cystic )
Used primarily to evaluate palpable masses and
equivocal mammogram abnormalities
Guide for cyst aspiration/needle biopsies
61
Computed Tomography
(CT)
No more radiation than with regular x-rays of
the chest, skull or bone
Revolutionized staging due to its exceptional
sensitivity and specificity in evaluating different
parts of the body
62
63
Computed Tomography
•
Oral contrast taken 1 to 4 hours prior to exam
to illuminate bowel
•
Intravenous contrast ( iodine based ) given a few
minutes prior to exam to illuminate vascular
structures
•
Images taken typically at 3 to 5 mm intervals
64
CT Scanning in Lung Cancer
CT of the chest and upper abdomen
- Evaluates the possibility of metastatic disease
(i.e. liver and adrenals)
- Evaluates the mediastinal lymph nodes which is very
important in determining resectability
- Mediastinal node accuracy
sensitivity 79%
specificity 65%
65
66
CT Abdomen and Pelvis
Evaluates primarily liver, spleen, abdominal
lymph nodes, kidneys, bladder and uterus
Not particularly sensitive in evaluating bowel
abnormalities i.e. stomach, colon, etc.
67
68
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Principle – Creation of a magnetic field designed
to pull hydrogen atoms from their axis
More sensitive than CT scanning for evaluation of:
- brain
- spine
- joints and bones
69
70
71
72
Ultrasound
Cystic versus solid
- Liver, ovary and kidneys
Extent of disease
- transrectal evaluation in prostate cancer
and rectal cancer
- endoscopic ultrasound in esophageal cancer
73
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Important for assessing tumor extent in
gastrointestinal tumors
Assesses both depth of involvement (T) and
lymph node status (N)
Valuable in localizing disease in prostate cancer
for biopsy purposes and in staging of esophageal
and rectal cancer
74
Bone Scan
Uses technetium-99m pyrophosphate
Sensitivity 88%, specificity 92%
Widely used to evaluate patients with prostate
cancer as well as breast cancer
Ordered frequently in a patient with malignancy
if bone pain is present or elevation of the
calcium or alkaline phosphatase is noted
Is not indicated in multiple myeloma
75
Positron Emission Tomography
(PET)
Designed to identify metabolic differences
between normal and malignant cells
Example: Malignant cells show an increased rate
of DNA synthesis and glycolysis; thus, FDG is
preferentially taken up by malignant cells
76
PET Superiority over CT
Pulmonary nodule – Positive predictive value of
PET is 94%, negative predictive value is 100%
Superior to CT scanning in evaluating
mediastinal lymph nodes in determining lung
cancer resectability
Sensitivity
CT
79%
PET
85%
Specificity
65%
81%
77
PET Scanning
Superior to bone scan in identifying lytic
bone mets
Useful in assessing response to treatment in
some cancers
Use is and will continue to increase in
medicine
78
Pathologic or Procedural Staging
Thoracentesis
Frequently important to determine the cause of a
pleural effusion
May alter treatment strategy (i.e., in lung cancer,
difference between operable and inoperable)
Technique: needle is placed posteriorly just above
the rib and inserted into the pleural space and the
fluid is extracted
79
Thoracentesis
Needle
Insertion
Area
Left Lung
Pleural Membrane
Pleural Effusion
Diaphragm
Needle
80
Paracentesis
Can be used as a diagnostic and/or therapeutic
procedure
Diagnostic: determining if the ascites is
secondary to liver dysfunction, malignancy or
infection
Therapeutic tool: Relief of pressure and pain
when massive amounts of malignant ascitic fluid
accumulates
81
Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy
Aspiration – Obtaining a cell count such as the
number of plasma cells in patients with multiple
myeloma
Biopsy – Evaluate cellularity – normally be
about 50% (drops some with age)
82
83
Mediastinoscopy
Used to assess the mediastinal lymph nodes
Important in evaluating the operability of a
patient with non-small cell lung cancer
Technique involves an incision in the area of the
suprasternal notch; however, a left anterior chest
wall incision may be needed as well
Indication has decreased with the advent of CT
and PET scanning
84
ONCOLOGIC
EMERGENCIES
Thomas M. Waits, M.D.
2017
85
Oncologic Emergencies
Superior vena cava syndrome – surrounded by
lymph node chains that drain the right thoracic
cavity and lower left thoracic cavity
Azygos, internal mammary, lateral thoracic,
paraspinous and esophageal venous systems
serve as collaterals
86
Malignancies Associated With
SVC Obstruction
Lung cancer (both small cell and non-small cell)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Germ cell tumors
Thymomas
Hodgkin’s disease
87
Non-Malignant Causes of SVC
Syndrome
Central venous catheter clot
Pacemaker clot
Mediastinal fibrosis
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
Treatment of SVC Obstruction
General support
Evaluation of head and upper body
Oxygen
Diuretics
Specific treatment directed by biopsy
Use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy or surgery to
treat the malignancy
95
Treatment of SVC Obstruction
(continued)
Central venous catheter clot
Thrombolytic therapy
Angioplasty
Heparin
96
Spinal Cord Compression
Overall outcome is influenced by neurologic status at the
time treatment is started
Spinal cord compression is either extradural or intradural
Extradural – more common
Vertebral body compressing anteriorly on the dural sac
Symptoms: Pain followed by weakness and sensory deficit
Intradural
Seen occasionally with breast cancer
More difficult to treat
97
98
Spinal Cord Compression
Signs and Symptoms:
Back pain 80-90% - localizes the lesion
Numbness or sensory loss
Lower extremity weakness
Hyper-reflexiveness
Incontinent of bowel / bladder
99
Spinal Cord Compression
Treatment and Evaluation
Begin on Decadron - steroid that reduces edema
or swelling
MRI of the spine
Treatment – radiation therapy alone or surgery
followed by radiation therapy
100
Hypercalcemia of Malignancy
Mechanism: Bone destruction caused by OAF
(osteoclast activating factor )or similar proteins
produced by malignant cells (i.e., multiple
myeloma or squamous carcinoma of the lung )
Release of calcium into the bloodstream from
the disease altered bone
101
Hypercalcemia
Signs and Symptoms
Lethargy/stupor
Polyuria/nocturia
Obstipation/constipation
Renal insufficiency or failure
102
Treatment of Hypercalcemia
Hydration: usually with normal saline at
150-200 cc/hour
Osteoclast inhibitors: zoledronate ( zometa ) &
denosumab ( xgeva )
Loop diuretics (furosemide) which eliminate
Ca++, only used when the patient has been well
hydrated
103
Zolendric Acid
Given over 15 minutes
85% of patients have a normal calcium by day 10
Can worsen renal insufficiency (should not be used
with creatinine >3.0)
104
Denosumab ( Xgeva )
Binds to RANKL which prevents preosteoclasts from maturing to osteoclasts
Given sub Q
Main side effect: hypocalcemia- maybe
prolonged
105
Hyperuricemia
Associated cancers include non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma, chronic myelogenous leukemia and
acute leukemia
Clinic manifestations – gout, renal insufficiency,
renal failure
106
Hyperuricemia Treatment
Prophylactic administration of allopurinol
Discontinuation of drugs that increase uric acid
such as thiazides and salicylates
Keep the urine pH greater than 7.0 (sodium
bicarb or acetazolamide)
Hydration
107
Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Consists of:
Hyperuricemia
Hyperkalemia
Hyperphosphatemia
Hypocalcemia
Cause: Rapid death of malignant cells and
release of their cellular content
108
Treatment
Identify patients at risk
Rigorous hydration
Allopurinol
Urine alkalinization
Frequent electrolyte checks and correction of
abnormalities
109
Hypoglycemia
Associated Tumors
Certain pancreatic islet cell tumors (i.e. insulinoma)
Certain sarcomas (fibro, leiomyo, rhabdo or
liposarcomas)
Mechanism:
increased insulin
Production of insulin-like proteins
Increased glucose utilization
110
Hypoglycemia Symptoms
Weakness
Confusion
Dizziness
Headache
Hunger
Instability
Agitation
Combativeness
111
Hypoglycemia Physical Signs
Tachycardia
Diaphoresis
Pallor
Lethargy
Seizures
Coma
112
Hypoglycemia
Whipple’s Triad
Symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia
Low serum glucose level
Relief of symptoms when glucose is normal
113
Hypoglycemia Treatment
Dextrose or glucagon
Treatment of the underlying tumor
114
Adrenal Failure
Involvement of the adrenal glands with metastatic
cancers, especially lung cancer
Cause of adrenal insufficiency by these tumors is
rare
Symptoms include fatigue, hypotension,
hyperkalemia, hyponatremia
115
Urinary Obstruction
Causes:
Extrinsic compression by various tumors
(lymphomas, sarcoma, etc.)
Intrinsic blockage by metastatic disease (breast
cancer; rare)
Retroperitoneal fibrosis caused by prior surgery,
radiation therapy or chemotherapy
116
Urinary Obstruction
Signs and Symptoms
Acute obstruction – colicky pain
Chronic obstruction
Unilateral – no symptoms
Bilateral – dull flank pain, hypertension, weakness,
edema and renal failure
117
Urinary Obstruction
Treatment
Percutaneous technique
Endourologic technique
Retrograde
Antegrade
118