Transcript PowerPoint Presentation - Administrative

GEOSS
Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 3
- Energy ScenarioIsabelle Blanc
Lionel Ménard
Kickoff Meeting
March 2010
[email protected]
MINES ParisTech
Participants
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Isabelle Blanc (Mines ParisTech)
Lionel Menard (via telecon) (Mines ParisTech)
Steve Browdy (IEEE)
Nadine Alameh (OGC Ipteam)
Bertrand de Longueville (JRC)
Steven Smolders (GIM)
Juergen Walther (BKG)
George Percival (OGC)
The proposed Energy scenario:
“Information on environmental impacts
of the production, transportation and
use of energy”
Slide 3 – March 2010
Key issues when assessing the
environmental impact of the
photovoltaic sector scenario (USERS)
• What is the most favourable material for PV panel
construction ? (Installers)
• What are the overall environmental performances of PV
systems related to their implementation ? (policy
planners, energy operators)
• What is the carbon footprint of a PV system according
to its lifecycle ? (policy planners, energy operators)
• What are the overall environmental performances of PV
systems related to their fabrication (Installers, Energy
operators, policy planners)?
Slide 4 – March 2010
Data sets needed (data providers):
• Solar radiation (kWh/m2) (MINES ParisTech)
• Environmental outputs of PV technology (Ecoinvent)
GEOSS Interoperable approach (GENESIS):
• Support the transition of W3C services to OGC services
• Provide appropriate web map (WMS) and web processing capabilities
(WPS) using software from the GENESIS solution
• Provide the Web Portal and Geodata Visualisation portlet (GUI)
Slide 5 – March 2010
PV installation impact outputs
Carbon Footprint of mc-Si over France
12.4% efficiency – manufactured in France
no recycling - www.espace-pv.eu
Several impacts compared
to the country mix / kWh
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Mc-Si technology for PV modules
Modules tilt : 30°
PV system lifetime = 30 years
PV electricity
Country mix
Slide 6 – March 2010
Highlights of discussion
• Characteristics of energy (renewable and non-renewable)
– Direct and indirect impacts (over life-time)
– Cross SBA (climate, water, ecosystems, health)
• Discussion about for linking energy and emergency preparedness
– Supporting Arctic Council (Emergency preparedness working group)
– E.g. Link between location facilities and global petroleum
assessment from USGS
• Suggestions for consideration
– Using same datasets to create additional outputs for the scenario
(e.g. Energy PayBack Time or Climatic PayBack Time)
– Publish selected outputs as WMS for more wider access
– Issue WMS request via GEOSS portal that triggers WPS
– Investigate GENESIS platform catalog feature and keep WAF as a
backup
Work Plan
• May: Finalize scenario (users, parameters, data,
components, services, etc)
• June (?): Use case mapping, specialization and
refinement
• Web services ready for testing
• Client ready for testing
• Demo capture
• Telecon every two weeks?