Transcript External information resources

Do we know power hidden in the library?
Libraries for education
N. Andrejčíková, J. Šubová
Main items
•
•
•
•
do we know what we have in library?
what is rate of utilization?
can we “mine” more?
what we can do another way
Hidden power
•
•
•
•
external resources
internal resources
philosophy of services
philosophy of processing
External information resources
• information resources access
1. traditional approach
• resources provide separately
• different language, different environment
• principle: we provide access other is up to user
2. new approach
• external resources integration into online catalogue
• unified language, unified environment + link to original
resource
• principle: we provide information (this is not knowledges)
External information resources
External information resources
Internal information resources
1. publication activities
• i.e. full review of teachers activities
• problem is – database is separately, there is no
connection with information on the web of department
2. literature for education
• problem is – information about document availability isn’t
accessible from the web of departments
3. thesis
• i.e. review about thesis realized
• problem is – information about thesis is missing, thesis
are registered separately, full text is missing, there is no
connection with information on the web of department
Philosophy of services
1. traditional approach
• borrow, copies, search
• services limited by opening hours
• document acquirement is enough for user; if user wants to
have something, he will come; user knows services and
he will fit for
2. new approach
• electronic services
• user has more personalized possibilities
• services fit to users; user have choice; he gets information
everywhere and everytime
• Library for you, Library can solve your problem
• Web 2.0, Web 3.0, Library 2.0
Philosophy of processing
1. traditional approach
• document processing – basic description + some indexing
• authorities are used “in temperance” and “by force”
• context isn’t followed up
2. new approach
• document processing as complex information object –
processing of elements with connection to authorities
• authorities with additional values
• factual database instead of catalogue
• user orientation – in processing too
Web 2.0
characteristic services: Google with Search, Maps, Gmail, Calendar;
AdSense, Wikipedia, Blogy, RSS, YouTube, Flickr, Del.icio.us, Last,
CalendarHub, MashUp,...
• services for content creating – wiki, blogy, odkazy, fotky, videá, hudba
• services for sources aggregation – RSS, ATOM, ...
• services for tagging, folksonomies creation, evaluation...
Internet evolution – Web 3.0, 4.0, ...
„Web OS“ 2007 
•
•
•
•
•
•
3D PORTALS
INTEROPERABLE PROFILES
MEDIA FLOWS
AVATAR REPRESENTATION
SOCIAL SOFTWARE
VIRTUAL WEB WORLDS
Semantic databases, semantic
search, distributed search,
inteligent personal agents
Library evolution
Library 1.0
„Read only, use only library“
• online catalogue
• loan services
• search services (search processing and )
• ...
Library 2.0
„Read/write, use/create library“
• personalization
• new technologies
• interactive services
• ...
Web 2.0 + libraries = Library 2.0 ?
Library 2.0
• new technologies application (not only)
+
• new approach of library to users and new approach of
users to library (to services, collections…)
• expansion of library area of interest
• higher quality of library web presentation, web creation in
collaboration with users
• internal changes and changes in profession
Library 2.0
Possibilities
• web services – use of information processed for
presentation
• RSS not only for library web but for catalogue too
(interactive and personalized information about news
in databases)
• library web as portal for external information
resources include federative search
• complex processing of activities in library (institution)
from idea to result and presentation
Possibilities - example
From compatibility to interoperability
web
projects
register
admin
bg.
database
library
secretary
information system
Library 2.0
Premises a requirements
• standards
• object oriented approach to processing (FRAD,
FRBR, CRM…) + ontology creation
• adequate qualification (Library 2.0 in next education
too – eLearning and new technologies in education
and information transfer in institution)
• cooperation and discussion
Basic scheme of entities
RESEARCH
result
donated
result
GRANT
WORK
WORK
create
create
DEPARTMENT
work for
AUTHOR
create
collaboration
AUTHOR 2
Time for your questions
?
Thank you for your attention
Ing. Nadežda Andrejčíková
[email protected]
Mgr. Jana Šubová
[email protected]
Cosmotron Bohemia s.r.o.
Pančava 415/11
695 01 Hodonín
[email protected]
www.cosmotron.cz