Transcript Total revenue = P4 x Q1. Profit

1. Profit is $50. Profit = (Price –
Average Total Cost) x
Quantity = (20 – 15) x 10.
Consumer
Surplus
Deadweight
Loss
2. Lightly shade and label the
area of deadweight loss.
PO
3. Lightly shade and label the
area consumer surplus.
QO
4. Indicate the socially optimum
price and quantity on the graph.
5. What would the firm have to do in order to expand output beyond 10 units?
Why is it unlikely to do that? It would have to lower price, but any reduction
in price would bring marginal revenue down below marginal cost, meaning
the firm would no longer be maximizing profits.
6. Of the two market structures we have
studied (perfect competition and
monopoly), which one is represented by the
graph at left? How can you tell?
It’s a monopoly because it has a
downward-sloping demand curve and
marginal revenue < price.
7. On the graph, draw in the profitmaximizing quantity and price for the firm.
See graph.
8. Is this firm experiencing positive economic profit, normal profit, or negative
economic profit? Shade in the area of economic profit (or loss) and explain.
Economic loss. Price is less than ATC.
9. What should this firm due in the short-run (trick question)? What should it do in
the long-run? Short –run: you can’t tell because there is no AVC curve.
Long-run: It should shut down if it can’t lower its costs so that ATC is less than
price.
Liam F., notice what we were talking about yesterday. When I draw the graph
correctly, with MC intersecting ATC at its minimum point, the graph doesn’t make
it look like the company could produce where price = ATC.
10. Why is the demand curve for a monopolist downward-sloping?
Because the monopolist is the entire industry, his demand curve is the
same as the industry demand curve. In order to sell more output, the
monopolist must lower price.
11. Why does the marginal revenue curve for a monopolist lie below the
demand curve? In other words, why is marginal revenue always less
than price for the single-price (non-price-discriminating) monopolist?
Because the monopolist must reduce price on all units in order to sell
additional output. This means that his total revenue will not increase
by the full amount of the price when output is increased.
Example:
10 units sold at $100 = $1000 in total revenue.
11 units sold at $99 = $1089 in total revenue.
The price of the 11th unit is $99, but
The marginal revenue of the 11th unit is only $89.
12. Assume now that this monopolist’s variable costs decrease. Indicate this
change in costs on the graph. Draw in the new profit-maximizing quantity and
price after the decrease in costs. Is the firm now making positive, normal, or
negative economic profit? Explain Note: this will depend on where you drew your
new curves (how much you shifted them.) In my example, the firm is still incurring
losses, because price is still below ATC at the profit-maximizing quantity.
13. If the monopolist in the graph at left were
producing at quantity Q2, what would be
happening to total revenue with each
additional unit sold? Explain.
Total revenue would decrease with each
additional unit because marginal revenue at
that point (and beyond) is negative.
14. What level of output and price from the
graph above would achieve allocative
efficiency? Explain. Q2 and P3. That is where
marginal cost = price, which is equal to the
marginal benefit society places on the good.
15. In the graph above, what will be the firm’s total revenue at profit-maximizing
price and level of output? What will be the firm’s profit?
Total revenue = P4 x Q1. Profit = (P4 - P2) x Q1
16. In the graph at left, what area represents
consumer surplus at profit-maximizing quantity
and price (identify by letters). HJP5
17. If the firm at left were to produce at the
allocatively efficient level of output, what would
happen to consumer surplus (be specific – if it
would change, by how much would it change)?
It would increase by the area JKP4P5
18. If this firm decided to maximize total revenue
rather than profit, at what level of output would it
produce? Explain.
It would produce at Q3. Up until that point,
marginal revenue is positive, so total revenue is
increasing. Beyond that point, total revenue
begins to decrease because marginal revenue is
negative.
19. At what point does this monopolist’s demand curve become inelastic? Explain.
Note: This might be a hard question for some of you. Use your book. Think. You
can get this and it’s important that you are able to.
The demand curve becomes inelastic at Point L. Beyond that point, total revenue
decreases with any decrease in price (because marginal revenue becomes
negative at that point). This is one of the definitions of “inelastic.”
20. Which area represents the economic
profit of the profit-maximizing monopolist
pictured at left (identify by letters).
RIUL
21. If this were a perfectly competitive
industry with the same costs as the one
pictured at left, what would be the shortrun equilibrium price and quantity? What
long-term changes would occur to supply,
price, and quantity in the industry as a
result of this?
Price = T. Quantity = Q3. New firms would
enter so supply would increase, price
would decrease, and quantity would
increase.
22. Assume that a monopolist is charging all of its customers a single price. If it can
find a way to charge each of its customers what he or she is willing to pay, what would
happen to:
a. Profit – Increase b. consumer surplus – Decrease c. level of output – Increase
23. What is the scenario described in #22 called? Be specific.
Perfect price discrimination.
24. A prescription drug maker charges different prices for its products in
different countries due to the different demand curves in each country.
a. What pricing practice is this firm engaging in?
Price discrimination.
b. What allows this firm to do this?
It is able to segregate its market and sell to different
customers at different prices based on their different demand curves.
c. Why would this firm be against a law that allows its prescription
drugs to be re-imported into the United States from a foreign country? (For
example, exported to Indonesia for sale there, and then shipped back to the
United States by a retail seller.) Consider this question in the context of this
chapter.
This would destroy its ability to price discriminate by allowing re-sale
of its product. For example, an Indonesian company could export the drug to
the U.S. and sell it cheaper than prices in the U.S. market.