Transcript PPT

Chapter 15
Oligopoly and
Game Theory
MODERN PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
Third Edition
Outline




Cartels
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Oligopolies
When Are Cartels and Oligopolies Most
Successful?
 Government Policy toward Cartels and
Oligopolies
 Business Strategy and Changing the Game
2
Introduction
 An oligopoly is an industry that is dominated
by a small number of firms.
 A cartel is an oligopoly that tries to act together
to reduce supply, raise prices, and increase
profits.
 Even when an oligopoly is not able to collude,
prices are likely to be higher than in a
competitive market.
 Game theory is used to model decisions in
situations where the players interact.
3
Definition
Oligopoly:
a market that is dominated by a small
number of firms.
Cartel:
a group of suppliers who try to act as if
they were a monopoly.
4
Definition
Strategic decision making:
decision making in situations that are
interactive.
5
Self-Check
An oligopoly is a market that is:
a. Dominated by one firm.
b. Dominated by cartels.
c. Dominated by a few firms.
Answer: c – an oligopoly is a market that is
dominated by a few firms.
6
Cartels
 The Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) is a cartel of oil-exporting
countries.
 Between 1970 and 1974 OPEC cut back on
their production of oil.
 The price of oil shot up from $7 per barrel to
almost $38 a barrel.
7
Cartels
The Price of Oil 1960 – 2012
8
Cartels
Price
Price
Competitive Market
(constant cost)
As if controlled
by a monopolist
Profit shared by
members of cartel
PM
PC
MC = AC
Supply
D
QC
Quantity
D
MR
QM
QC
Quantity
A cartel tries to move a market from “Competitive”
toward “As If Controlled By a Monopolist”.
9
Self-Check
Cartels try to increase their profits by:
a. Reducing costs.
b. Reducing quantity.
c. Increasing quantity.
Answer: b – cartels try to increase profits by
reducing quantity and therefore increasing price.
10
Cartels
 Cartels tend to collapse and lose their power
for three reasons:
1. Cheating by the cartel members.
2. New entrants and demand response.
3. Government prosecution and regulation.
11
The Incentive to Cheat
 If a cartel succeeds, each
member makes high profits.
 These profits create an
incentive to cheat
 When everyone reduces
production and price rises,
some members will then
cheat by producing more.
REUTERS/CORBIS
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
hugs Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah
bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud during
an OPEC summit in 2000.
12
The Incentive to Cheat
Price
Price
Monopoly
Four-Firm Cartel
Other members
Revenue
lost
Revenue
lost
Revenue
gained
PO
PO
P1
Revenue
gained
P1
D
QO
Q1
Quantity
D
QO
Q1
Quantity
 Monopoly ↑ quantity: it bears all of the loss due to the lower price.
 Cartel member ↑ quantity: losses are shared with the other members.
 Conclusion: A member of a cartel has a greater incentive to cheat.
13
Self-Check
One of the ways cartels lose their market power
is through:
a. Competing with each other for customers.
b. Going bankrupt.
c. Members cheating on the agreement.
Answer: c – a member of a cartel can increase
profits even further by cheating and producing
more than they had originally agreed on.
14
Prisoner’s Dilemma
 A cartel cheating is one version of a game called
the prisoner’s dilemma.
 It suggests that cooperation is difficult to
maintain.
 Political scientist Elinor Ostrom showed that
members of communities with repeated
interaction generally find rules or norms that limit
the prisoner’s dilemma.
15
Definition
Prisoner’s dilemma:
a situation where the pursuit of individual
interest leads to a group outcome that is
in the interest of no one;
the negative counterpart to the invisible
hand.
16
Prisoner’s Dilemma
A Payoff Table
In this game, Cheat is a better strategy for each player no
matter what the other player’s strategy.
17
Definition
Dominant strategy:
a strategy that has a higher payoff than
any other strategy no matter what the
other player does.
18
Self-Check
A game where pursuing one’s own interest leads
to an outcome that is in no one’s interest is
called the:
a. Oligopoly outcome.
b. Dominant strategy.
c. Prisoner’s dilemma.
Answer: c – this is called the prisoner’s
dilemma.
19
Collusion
 When only a handful of firms can realistically bid
on a contract, it becomes profitable to collude.
 Firms can agree to take turns being the “low”
bidder.
 Collusive outcomes may evolve even without
explicit agreement.
 Collusion/cartels are illegal in the US except
for…
 Government sanctioned cartels (agriculture,
professional sports, taxi cab companies, etc)
20
Definition
Tacit collusion:
when firms limit competition with one
another but they do so without explicit
agreement or communication.
21
Oligopolies
 Oligopolies are markets dominated by a small
number of firms.
 A firm in an oligopoly has some influence over
price and therefore has an incentive to reduce
output and increase price.
 Price in an oligopoly is likely to be below
monopoly levels but above competitive levels.
 The more firms in an industry, the closer price
will be to competitive levels.
22
Oligopolies
Price
Four firm oligopoly:
 Firm 4 ↓Q → ↑ price to P1 → Profit
 Other firms ↑P → ↑ their profits
Profit increase
other firms.
Profit increase firm 4
P1
P0
MC = AC
Demand
Q1 Q0
Quantity
23
Self-Check
Oligopoly prices tend to be:
a. Lower than monopoly but higher than
competitive prices.
b. Lower than monopoly or competitive prices.
c. Higher than monopoly but lower than
competitive prices.
Answer: a – oligopoly prices tend to be lower
than monopoly but higher than competitive prices.
24
Definition
Barriers to entry:
factors that increase the cost to new firms
of entering an industry.
25
Oligopolies
 Cartels and oligopolies tend to be most
successful when there are barriers to entry.
 Important barriers to entry include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Control over a key resource or input.
Economies of scale.
Network effects.
Government barriers.
26
Government Policy
 Most cartels have been illegal in the United
States since the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890.
 Antitrust laws are used to prosecute cartels,
block mergers, and break up very large firms.
 Sometimes governments reduce competition and
create barriers to entry by supporting cartels.
 For example, the U.S. government raises the
price of milk through subsidies and quotas.
 Government encouraged creation of cartels
(price fixing) during the Great Depression.
27
Government Policy
 Are cartels strictly a form of crony capitalism?
 Government-enforced monopolies and cartels are a
serious problem facing poor nations.
 Government-supported cartels usually mean higher
prices, lower-quality service, and less innovation.
 People spend their energies trying to get monopoly or
cartel privileges from governments.
 Government becomes more corrupt.
 The most successful cartels operate with the
explicit support of (and enforcement by) the
government.
28
Government Cartels
Government sponsored Cartel examples:
• Raisins (Raisin Administrative Committee)
• Raisin growers required to keep some portion of
crop off market in a “raisin reserve”
• Growers who don’t collude are fined and/or
penalized
• WHY DO THIS???
• Who pays? Who benefits?
• The free market is a dangerous idea apparently
• Crony capitalism
29
Government Cartels
 Government sponsored Cartel examples:
• Milk Cartels – price fixing by region
• Created in 1930s to keep prices from falling (via
Keynesian aggregate demand arguments even
though people were going hungry)
• Cartels created for political reasons, not
economic, producers abhor competition
• Yet people think that the government protects
them from this sort of behavior
• Who pays? Who benefits?
30
Government Cartels
 Government sponsored Cartel examples:
• Other examples:
•
•
•
•
•
Credit rating agencies
Certain labor unions, occupational licensing
Sugar
TBTF banks
Numerous state and local laws or licensing
requirements that protect politically favored
businesses
•
•
Taxi cartels (local government)
Louisiana casket cartel
31
Government Cartels
 "We never face a choice between regulation and
no regulation. We face a choice between kinds of
regulation: regulation by legislatures and
bureaucracies, or regulation by market forces —
regulation by restriction of choice, or regulation
by the exercise of choice.“

– Howard Baetjer
 http://fee.org/freeman/detail/theres-no-suchthing-as-an-unregulated-market
32
There’s No Such Thing as an “Unregulated” Market
When market failure occurs, the presumption
is that regulation will solve the problem:
Nirvana Fallacy is a name given to the
informal fallacy of comparing actual things with
unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also
refer to the tendency to assume that there is a
perfect solution to a particular
problem.(perfectly)
Many regulatory agencies are subject to
“regulatory capture”
33
Business Strategy
 Suppose that Lowe’s and Home Depot are locked
into a price war over refrigerator sales.
 Each firm could set a high price of $1,000 or a low
price of $800.
 Assume that costs are zero and that there are
1,000 consumers.
 If both firms set a high price, each gets 500
consumers and makes a profit of $500,000
($1,000 × 500).
34
Business Strategy
 If one firm sets a low price ($800) while the other
firm continues to set a high price then the lowprice firm gets all the customers (1,000) and
makes more money, $800,000.
 If both firms set a low price, then they again split
the market and each makes $400,000.
 They both have the incentive to set low prices but
would be better off (more $ profit) if they both set
high profits
 i.e. they are in a “prisoner’s dilemma”
35
Business Strategy
Lowe’s and Home Depot face the Prisoner’s Dilemma. The dominant
strategy is to set low prices.
36
Business Strategy
Price Matching
 Suppose competing firms offer to match lower
prices and give customers 10% of the difference.
 Rather than being a sign of a competitive market,
this strategy encourages higher prices
 If one sets price at $1000 and the other at $800,
customers can buy from the higher-priced firm at
$800 – (10% x 800) = $780.
 The price match guarantee changes the payoffs
and that changes the game.
37
Price Matching
 A firm has no incentive to drop price, because its
competitor will get all the customers.
 Lowe’s strategic decisions:
(1) Home Depot chooses High Price
Lowe’s earns $500,000 by choosing High Price
Lowe’s earns $0 by choosing Low Price.
(2) Home Deport Chooses Low Price
Lowe’s earns $780,000 by choosing High Price
Lowes earns $400,000 by choosing Low Price
 Same decisions are symmetric by Home Depot
38
Price Matching
 Whatever choice Home Depot makes, it’s better
for Lowe’s to choose High Price
 Note: When Lowe’s chooses to post a Low Price,
consumers run to buy from Home Depot, which
despite a high posted price offers to match the
Lowe’s price and give consumers 10% of the
difference in prices.
 The dominant strategy is to choose High Price
39
Price Matching
A price match guarantee that looks pro-consumer
changes the equilibrium strategies from:
{Low Price, Low Price} to {High Price, High Price}.
The price match guarantee plus the promise to pay
10% of the difference in price turns out to be a
clever strategy that reduces the incentive of firms to
compete with lower prices!
40
Business Strategy
Lowe’s and Home Depot face the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
The price matching game.
41
Business Strategy - Loyalty Plans
 Loyalty plans reward regular customers with
special treatment or a better price.
 Once customers are locked in, firms don’t have to
compete as much.
 If a firm raises price, its customers will remain
loyal; if it lowers price, other firms’ customers will
also remain loyal.
 Loyalty plans reduce competition: make
customers more demand inelastic
 Loyalty plans increase monopoly power and
results in higher prices.
42
Self-Check
Loyalty plans lead to:
a. Higher prices.
b. Lower prices.
c. More competition.
Answer: a – by encouraging lock-in, loyalty plans
lead to monopoly power and thus higher prices.
43
Business Strategy
Innovation
 Pursuit of market power can lead to innovation
and product differentiation.
 One reason firms innovate is to produce a
product with fewer substitutes.
 Fewer substitutes mean more inelastic demand,
leading to higher prices and profits.
 Firms also compete by differentiating their
products with different styles or features.
44
Innovation - Uber
 Traditional taxi cab companies (TCC) – regulated
by local governments
 Local cartel – must have license (or medallion)
issued by government
 NYC medallions sold for over $1 million
 Limit and control supply raised cab prices and
profits
 Who pays?
 Problem: TCC’s very inefficient, high search costs
• Why do cabs conglomerate around airports, hotels?
45
Innovation - Uber
 Problem: TCC’s very inefficient, high search
costs
• Why do cabs conglomerate around airports, hotels?
• TCCs have no way of gauging or responding to real
time changes in demand
• Lots of idle resources
 Uber and other firms solved the “Search” & cost
problems via technology
• The TCC’s had every opportunity to do this
many years ago but didn’t
46
Innovation - Uber
 Uber has eradicated search costs:
• Riders don’t have difficulty finding empty cabs
• Cars dispatched on real time demand
• No waiting around at highly probable
locations
 Helps consumers who don’t like long waits or
uncertainty (more value)
 Uber can dispatch more drivers during higher
demand periods
47
Innovation - Uber
 Uber’s social benefits:
 Allows far more efficient use of capital
 Enhances consumer welfare
 Consumers may buy fewer cars leading to
savings and reducing environmental harms
 Less cars, more space for other things
48
Innovation - Uber
 Does Uber have significant market power?
 Uber is a technology company
 Developed super efficient dispatch
technology/software
 Direct spillover from smartphone tech
 What prevents entry/competition against Uber?
• Drivers drive their own vehicle, self-driving
cars?
 Uber an idea that created immense value
 Will Uber be around in 10 years? (“Myspace”)
49
Innovation - Uber
 AEI article on Uber:
 https://www.aei.org/publication/the-beauty-of-uber-andwhy-it-represents-the-future-of-transportation-it-hasbasically-eradicated-search-costs/
 Uber and the Great Taxicab Collapse (7:43)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0yLhlQ6kCQ
50
Takeaway
 An oligopoly is a market dominated by a small
number of firm.
 Oligopolies form when there are significant
barriers to entry.
 Prices in an oligopoly tend to be below
monopoly prices but above competitive prices.
 A cartel is an oligopoly that maximizes profits by
limiting competition and producing the monopoly
quantity.
51
Takeaway
 Most cartels are not stable; either members
cheat or new competitors enter the market.
 Governments break up some cartels, but enforce
many others.
 Game theory is the study of strategic interaction.
 The prisoner’s dilemma game explains why
cheating is common in cartels.
 Firms can reduce competitive pressures through
price matching, loyalty programs, and innovation.
52