Nash equilibrium
Download
Report
Transcript Nash equilibrium
Oligopoly and Game Theory
ETP Economics
Jack Wu
Key Feature
Because of the few sellers, the key feature
of oligopoly is the tension between
cooperation and self-interest.
Characteristics
Characteristics of an Oligopoly Market
Few sellers offering similar or identical products
Interdependent firms
Best off cooperating and acting like a
monopolist by producing a small quantity of
output and charging a price above marginal cost
Simple Type: Duopoly
A duopoly is an oligopoly with only two
members. It is the simplest type of oligopoly.
Duopoly
Oligopoly with only two members
Decide quantity to sell
Price – determined on the market
By demand
Duopoly
Collude and form a cartel
Act as a monopoly
Total level of production
Quantity produced by each member
Don’t collude – self-interest
Difficult to agree; Antitrust laws
Higher quantity; lower price; lower profit
Not competitive allocation
Nash equilibrium
5
Collusion and Cartel
The duopolists may agree on a monopoly
outcome.
Collusion
An agreement among firms in a market about
quantities to produce or prices to charge.
Cartel
A group of firms acting in unison.
Is Cartel Possible?
Although oligopolists would like to form
cartels and earn monopoly profits, often that
is not possible. Antitrust laws prohibit
explicit agreements among oligopolists as a
matter of public policy.
The Equilibrium for an Oligopoly
A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which
economic actors interacting with one
another each choose their best strategy
given the strategies that all the others have
chosen.
The equilibrium for an Oligopoly
When firms in an oligopoly individually choose
production to maximize profit, they produce
quantity of output greater than the level produced
by monopoly and less than the level produced by
competition.
The oligopoly price is less than the monopoly price
but greater than the competitive price (which
equals marginal cost).
Size of an Oligopoly
How increasing the number of sellers affects
the price and quantity:
The output effect: Because price is above
marginal cost, selling more at the going price
raises profits.
The price effect: Raising production will
increase the amount sold, which will lower the
price and the profit per unit on all units sold.
Size of an Oligopoly
As the number of sellers in an oligopoly
grows larger, an oligopolistic market looks
more and more like a competitive market.
The price approaches marginal cost, and
the quantity produced approaches the
socially efficient level.
Strategic Action
Because the number of firms in an
oligopolistic market is small, each firm must
act strategically.
Each firm knows that its profit depends not
only on how much it produces but also on
how much the other firms produce.
Game Theory
Game theory is the study of how people
behave in strategic situations.
Strategic decisions are those in which each
person, in deciding what actions to take,
must consider how others might respond to
that action.
Prisoners’ Dilemma
The prisoners’ dilemma provides insight into the
difficulty in maintaining cooperation.
Often people (firms) fail to cooperate with one
another even when cooperation would make
them better off.
The prisoners’ dilemma is a particular “game”
between two captured prisoners that illustrates
why cooperation is difficult to maintain even when
it is mutually beneficial.
Bonnie’ s Decision
Confess
Bonnie gets 8 years
Remain Silent
Bonnie gets 20 years
Confess
Clyde gets 8 years
Clyde’s
Decision
Bonnie goes free
Clyde goes free
Bonnie gets 1 year
Remain
Silent
Clyde gets 20 years
Clyde gets 1 year
Copyright©2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning
Dominant Strategy
The dominant strategy is the best strategy for a
player to follow regardless of the strategies
chosen by the other players.
Dominant strategies in Prisoners’ dilemma:
_ Clyde: Confess
_ Bonnie: Confess
Nash Equilibrium & Best
Outcome
Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):
_ Clyde: Confess & Bonnie: Confess
Best Outcome (cooperation):
_ Clyde: Silent & Bonnie: Silent
Cooperation is difficult to maintain, because
cooperation is not in the best interest of the
individual player.
Game Example: OPEC
Iraq and Iran: Members of OPEC
Their decisions on oil production.
Decisions: High Production or Low
Production
Iraq’s Decision
High Production
Iraq gets $40 billion
Low Production
Iraq gets $30 billion
High
Production
Iran’s
Decision
Iran gets $40 billion
Iraq gets $60 billion
Iran gets $60 billion
Iraq gets $50 billion
Low
Production
Iran gets $30 billion
Iran gets $50 billion
Copyright©2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning
Nash Equilibrium
Dominant strategies:
_ Iran: High Production
_ Iraq: High Production
Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):
_ Iran: High Production & Iraq: High Production
Best Outcome (cooperation):
_ Iran: low production & Iraq: low production
Game Example: Where to
Advertise?
Players: Competitor.com or We.com
Decisions: NBA and NHL
Where to advertise?
Competitor.com
NBA
We.com
NHL
NBA
W: 4,
C: 3
W: 3,
C: 4
NHL
W: 3,
C: 4
W: 4,
C: 3
No Nash equilibrium in pure strategies
No Nash Equilibrium
Dominant strategies:
_ We.com: none
_ Competitor.com: none
Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):
_ We.com: none
_ Competitor.com: none
Game Example: Evening News
Players: ATV and TVB
Decisions: 7:30 pm or 8:00 pm
Evening News:
TVB
7:30pm
7:30pm A: 1,
ATV 8:0pm
B: 1
A: 4,
B: 3
8:0pm
A: 3,
B: 4
A: 2.5,
B: 2.5
Nash Equilibrium
Dominant strategies:
_ ATV: none
_ TVB: none
Two Nash Equilibria (self-interest):
_ ATV: 7:30pm & TVB: 8:00pm
or
_ ATV: 8:00pm & TVB: 7:30pm
Why People Sometimes
Cooperate
Firms that care about future profits will
cooperate in repeated games rather than
cheating in a single game to achieve a onetime gain.
Repeated prisoners’ dilemma
Encourage cooperation
Penalty for not cooperating
Better strategy
Return to cooperative outcome after a period of
noncooperation
Best strategy: tit-for-tat
Player - start by cooperating
Then do whatever the other player did last time
Starts out friendly
Penalizes unfriendly players
Forgives them if warranted
28