Transcript File

Chapter 9
International Trade
Ratna K. Shrestha
International Trade
 How
does
international trade
affect economic wellbeing?
 Who gains and who
loses (consumers or
producers) from free
trade among
countries?
Overview
The Determinants of Trade
 The Winners and Losers From Trade
 The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
 The Arguments for Restricting Trade

The Principle of
Comparative Advantage
 Recall
from Chapter 3 that trade can benefit
everyone in a society because it allows people
to specialize in activities in which they have a
comparative advantage.
 The
producer who has the smaller opportunity
cost of producing a good is said to have a
comparative advantage in producing that good.
Determinants of International Trade
 The
effects of international trade can be
shown as the difference between the domestic
price of a good without trade and the world
price of a good.
 A country
will either be an exporter of the good
or an importer of the good.
 If
the domestic price (without trade) is higher,
then the country becomes an importer.
Determinants of International Trade
International trade issues
are no different from
trading as it applies to
individuals within
a community and
between provinces and
regions within a country.
Equilibrium without Trade
Assume:
– A country that is isolated from the rest of
the world and produces steel.
– The market for steel consists of the buyers
and sellers of the country.
 In the absence of trade, the price adjusts to
equilibrate domestic supply and demand.
 The sum of consumer and producer surplus
measures the total benefits that buyers and
sellers receive from the steel market.
Equilibrium Without Trade
Steel Market
Price
Domestic
Supply
Consumer Surplus
Producer Surplus
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
Impacts of International Trade
 If
the country decides to engage in
international trade will it be an importer or
exporter of steel?
 Who will gain from free trade in steel and who
would lose?
 Would gains from trade exceed losses?
 To answer these questions..Start by
comparing market prices. . .
Determinants of International Trade
 If
a country has a comparative advantage, then
the domestic price will be below the world price
and the country will be an exporter of the good.
 If the rest of the world has a comparative
advantage, then the domestic price will be
higher than the world price and the country will
be an importer of the good.
International Trade: Exporter
 If
the world price of steel is higher than the
domestic price, producers of steel will want to
sell their steel at the world price, hence output
would increase and domestic price would rise.
 As
domestic suppliers produce more steel and
sell some of the additional output in the world
market, the domestic price will increase to the
world price. Domestic country becomes an
Exporter!
Price
International Trade: Exporter
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
Price
International Trade:Exporter
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
International Trade:Exporter
 The
difference between domestic demand and
domestic production at the world price is the
amount exported!
 It
can be determined, graphically, that, exports
will result in a net gain in surplus (welfare).
Price
International Trade:Exporter
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
World Price
Quantity
Exported!
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
International Trade:Exporter
Price
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
A
World Price
B
D
Net Gain in Surplus!
(CS = -B,  PS = B+D)
C
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
Welfare of Exporting Country
International Trade:Importer
 If
the world price of steel is lower than the
domestic price, the country would be an
importer of steel, when trade is permitted.
– Consumers will want to buy the lower priced
steel at the world price.
 Producers of steel will have to lower their
output until the supply price is equal to the
world price.
International Trade:Importer
Price
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
International Trade:Importer
Price
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
International Trade: Importer
 As
a result of a lower world market price, the
quantity demanded by the domestic consumers
will increase but the domestic production
decreases, hence the domestic country
becomes an Importer!
 The difference between domestic demand and
domestic production at the world price is the
amount imported!
 It can be determined, graphically, that, Imports
will result in a net gain in surplus (welfare).
Price
International Trade:Importer
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
Amount
Imported!
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
International Trade:Importer
Price
Steel Market
A
Domestic
Supply
Net Gain in Surplus!
(CS = B+D,  PS = -B)
B
D
World Price
C
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
Welfare of an Importing Country
Winners and Losers
 When
a country allows trade and becomes an
exporter of a good, domestic producers of the
good are better off. They receive a higher
price.
 However, domestic consumers of the good are
worse off. They pay a higher price.
 When a country allows trade and becomes an
importer of a good, domestic consumers of the
good are better off. They pay a lower price.
 However, domestic producers of the good are
worse off. They receive a lower price.
Winners and Losers From
Free International Trade
 No
matter who
losses or gains,
trade raises the
economic well-being
of the nation as a
whole.
 The net change in
total surplus is
positive.
Other
Benefits
of International
Trade
The
Lessons
for Trade
Policy
 Enhanced
flow of ideas, especially production
techniques.
 Increased variety of goods. We can enjoy
mangoes from Mexico, Papaya from the
Philippines and a car from Japan.
 Lower costs through economies of scale. Trade
leads to specialization. As a country produces
more for international market as well, it can
enjoy economies of scale (lower average cost
of production due to higher production).
 Increased competition. With trade firms have to
compete with foreign producers as well.
The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
 A tariff
is a tax on imported goods. It raises the
price of imported goods, above the world price
by the amount of the tariff.
 Domestic suppliers of the tariffed goods are
gainers while domestic consumers of the goods
are losers.
 The government gains from the tax revenue.
 Examples: U.S. tariff on Canadian lumber in
2001/2002. U.S. tariff on foreign steel. When we
buys goods from across the border, we pay
taxes if value of goods exceeds certain amount.
Price
The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
$$ value of
Import
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Quantity
Price
The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
Domestic
Supply
Steel Market
Tariff
}
World Price
Domestic
Demand
Imports w/ Tariff
Quantity
Price
The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
Domestic
Supply
Steel Market
Govt. Revenue
Reduced
Consumption
}
Tariff
Increased
Production
Quantity
The Welfare Effects of a Tariff
Price
Steel Market
Domestic
Supply
Deadweight
Losses From
Tariff
A
B
C
D
E
F
}
Tariff
G
Quantity
Deadweight Losses Due to Tariff
 Like
any tax on the sale of a good, it distorts
incentives and pushes the allocation of scarce
resources away from the optimum.
– Raises domestic prices and encourages more
domestic production (Loss = D). Notice this
extra increased domestic production can be
produced by foreign firms at a lower costs
(than the domestic firms) and in that sense
misallocation of resources.
– Higher domestic prices reduces the amount
purchased by domestic consumers (Loss =F).
The Effects of a Tariff
The Effects of an Import Quota




An import quota is a limit on the quantity of a
good that is produced abroad and sold
domestically.
It raises domestic price above the world price
– domestic buyers are worse off
– domestic sellers are better off.
Import license holders are better off because they
make a profit from buying at the world price and
selling at the higher domestic price.
Example: Canada permits only two bottles of
liquor import for individuals traveling across the
border.
Figure 7 The Effects of an Import Quota
Price
of Steel
Domestic
supply
Equilibrium
without trade
Quota
Isolandian
price with
quota
Equilibrium
with quota
Price
World
without =
price
quota
0
Domestic
supply
+
Import supply
Imports
with quota
S
Q
S
Domestic
demand
D
Q
Q
Imports
without quota
D
Q
World
price
Quantity
of Steel
Copyright © 2004 South-Western
Figure 7 The Effects of an Import Quota
Price
of Steel
Domestic
supply
Equilibrium
without trade
Quota
A
Isolandian
price with
quota
Price
World
without =
price G
quota
0
B
C
E'
D
Equilibrium
with quota
F
E"
Imports
with quota
S
Q
Domestic
supply
+
Import supply
S
Domestic
demand
D
Q
Q
Imports
without quota
D
Q
World
price
Quantity
of Steel
Copyright © 2004 South-Western
The Effects of an Import Quota
Thailand Imports Quota for Japan Steel Set
at 950,000 Tons (October 25th, 2007)
Under the Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement
(JTEPA), the quota for Thailand imports of Japan steel has been
set at 950,000 tons according to the Bangkok Post.
Of the Thailand imports quota, the largest allocations of steel
go to Siam United Steel and Thai Cold Rolled Sheet, both of
which are part of joint ventures with Nippon Steel and
Sahaviriya Steel Industries respectively.
The Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement (JTEPA)
states that Thailand will eliminate the 15% Thailand import
tariff for Japanese steel, and in return, Japan will reduce tariffs
for farm goods.
Arguments for Restricting Trade
 Jobs:
Trade leads to loss of jobs to countries with
lower wages or lax standards (such as
environmental). During presidential election in
1992, Ross Perot argument was that NAFTA will
lead to loss of US jobs to Mexico.
 National Security: A country should not import
militarily sensitive equipments from foreign nations.
 Infant Industry: For many start up businesses, it
takes time to be competitive with already
established foreign businesses and so needs some
protection in the form of trade (import) barriers.
Arguments for Restricting Trade
 Unfair-Competition:
Another argument is unfair
competition from foreign firms. In 2002, US
slapped 29% tax (on the average) on Canadian
lumber arguing that Canadian lumber industry
receives subsidies from the government (charge
minimum fee for logging in public lands) which is
unfair for US forest industry, where they don’t get
any such help from the government.
 Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip: When U.S.
imposed tariff on Canadian lumber and band on
beef (in the wake of BSE case in Alberta), there
was a talk of restricting energy supply to U.S. The
threat can be considered as a bargaining chip.
On the News:
Japan threatens US with trade quotas
June 11, 2005: Japan has joined with
six other countries including the EU in
warning the US of their intention of
imposing trade sanctions unless the
US government abolishes the Byrd
Amendment-an antidumping tariff
amendment (if it does not eliminate the
Continued Dumping and Subsidy
Offset act of 2000)
The World Trade Organization (WTO)
has termed the Byrd Amendment as
violation of the WTO rules.
Two Approaches to Free Trade
 Unilateral
– Britain in 19th century and South Korea and
Chile in recent years.
 Multilateral
– NAFTA (North American Free Trade
Agreement) among Canada, US and Mexico
in 1993. This agreement is meant to lower the
tariff and quota restriction on the flow of
goods and services across these 3 nations.
Two Approaches to Free Trade
 Multilateral:
GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariff),
a continuing series of trade agreements among
many nations. The rules of GATT are enforced by
World Trade Organization (WTO). GATT has
reduced the average tariff from 40% before WW
II to about 5% today.

On the news: WTO panel to rule on Canada-U.S.
lumber dispute (Jan, 2005): The WTO has set up
a panel to decide if the U.S. complied with its
earlier rulings that favored Canada in the longrunning dispute over softwood lumber.
Conclusion...
 Economists
see the benefits of trade between
countries the same way as they see the benefits
of trade between provinces, cities and people.
 Any
individual would have a much lower
standard of living if she or he had to produce all
of the goods that this individual planned to
consume!
 If there were no gains from trade, there would
have been no trade across individuals or
nations at all.