Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis
Download
Report
Transcript Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis
Civil Systems Planning
Benefit/Cost Analysis
Chapters 4 and 5
Scott Matthews
Courses: 12-706 and 73-359
Lecture 5 - 9/11/2002
1
Going Over HW #1
Mean = xx (out of 35, xx%)
St. dev = xx
Min = xx, Max = xx
Generally no major problems
12-706 and 73-359
2
Externalities
Recall that external effects happen to third
parties (non-consumers, producers)
Cause distortions in the market
Are by-products with no markets
Since number of externalities is large,
CBA can/should be used before
government intervenes to correct
12-706 and 73-359
3
Pollution (Air or Water)
P
Typical supply functions (MC) only
Describe private, not social costs.
We assume parallel cost curves
S#:marginal
Social costs
S*: marginal
Private costs
P#
What do these curves,
Equilibrium points
tell us?
P*
D
Q#
Q*
12-706 and 73-359
Q
4
Pollution (Air or Water)
P
Relatively too much gets produced,
At too low of a cost - how to
Reduce externality effects?
S#:marginal
Social costs
S*: marginal
Private costs
P#
P*
D
Q#
Q*
12-706 and 73-359
Q
5
Pollution (Air or Water)
P
Government can charge a tax ‘t’ on
Each unit, where t = distance between
The two supply curves What is NSB?
P#
S#:marginal
Social costs
S*: marginal
Private costs
t
P*
D
Q#
Q*
12-706 and 73-359
Q
6
Pollution (Air or Water)
P
CS = (loss) A+B
PS=(loss) E+F
S#:marginal
Social costs
S*: marginal
Private costs
P#
t
A
B
E
F
P*
P# - t
D
Q#
Q*
12-706 and 73-359
Q
7
Pollution (Air or Water)
P
Third parties: (gain) B+C+F
(avoided quantity between S curves)
Govt revenue: A+E
Total: gain of C
P#
C
A
B
E
F
S#:marginal
Social costs
S*: marginal
Private costs
t
C is reduced DWL
of pollution
eliminated by tax
P*
P# - t
D
Q#
Q*
12-706 and 73-359
Q
8
Distorted Market - Vouchers
Example: rodent control vouchers
Give residents vouchers worth $v of cost
Producers subtract $v gov’t pays them
Likely have spillover effects
Neighbors receive benefits since less
rodents nearby means less for them too
Thus ‘social demand’ for rodent control is
higher than ‘market demand’
12-706 and 73-359
9
Distortion : p0,q0 too low
What is NSB? What are CS, PS?
S
P
S-v
P0
P1
DM
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
DS: represents WTP
For vouchers by all
people
Q
10
Social Surplus - locals
P
What about other people in society,
i.e. nearby neighbors?
S
P
S-v
P1+v
P0
A
B
C
E
P1
DS
Because of vouchers,
Residents buy Q1
DM
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Q
11
Nearby Residents
P
Added benefits are area between demand
above consumption increase
S
What is cost voucher program?
P
S-v
F
P1+v
P0
A
B
C
E
G
P1
DS
DM
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Q
12
Voucher Market Benefits
Gain (CS) from target pop: B+E
Gain (CS) in nearby: C+G+F
Producers (PS): A+C
Program cost (vouchers):A+B+C+G+E ---Net: C+F
12-706 and 73-359
13
Opportunity Cost: Land
Government decides to buy Q acres of land, pays P per acre
What is total cost of project?
Price
S
P
b
D
Q
12-706 and 73-359
14
Opportunity Cost: Land
Government pays PbQ0, but society ‘loses’ CS that they
Would have had if government had not bought land. This lost
CS is the ‘opportunity cost’ of other people using/buying land.
Price
S
P
b
D
0
Q
12-706 and 73-359
15
Another Example: Change in
Demand for Concrete Project
If Q high enough, has effect: q’ more
Shifts demand - has supply/price effect
Moves from (P0,Q0) to (P1,Q1).. And??
Price
D
D+q’
S
P1
P0
a
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Quantity
16
Another Example: Change in
Demand
Original buyers: look at D, buy Q2
Total purchases still increase by q’
What is net cost/benefit to society?
Price
D
D+q’
S
P1
P0
a
Q2
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Quantity
17
Another Example: Change in
Demand
Original buyers: look at D, buy Q2
Project spends B+C+E+F+G on q’ units
Project causes change in social surplus!
Price
D+q’
D
S
P1
P0
A
B
C
E
G
G
Q2
F
G
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Quantity
18
Another Example: Change in
Demand
Decrease in CS: A+B (negative)
Increase in PS: A+B+C (positive)
Net social benefit of project is B+G+E+F
Price
D+q’
D
S
P1
P0
A
B
C
E
G
G
Q2
F
G
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Quantity
19
Final Thoughts: Change in
Demand
Unless rise in prices high, C negligible
So project outlays ~ social cost
Opp. Cost equals direct expenditures
Price adjusted by social surplus changes
D+q’
D
P1
P0
A
B
S
C
E
G
G
Q2
F
G
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
Quantity
20
Secondary Markets
When secondary markets affected
Can and should ignore impacts as long as
primary effects measured and undistorted
secondary market prices unchanged
Measuring both usually leads to double
counting (since primary markets tend to show
all effects)
12-706 and 73-359
21
Primary: Fishing Days
Government decides to buy Q acres of land, pays P per acre
What is total cost of project?
Price
a
MC0
b
MC1
P
D
Q0
Q1
12-706 and 73-359
22