Powerpoint Slides
Download
Report
Transcript Powerpoint Slides
Fixed Price and Haggling
Markets
Chris McLaughry
Kwan Homchampa
Purpose
See the effects of time constraints
on selection of market.
Experiment Setup
Buyers
Reservation Prices of 1000 to 2800
Steps of 200
Sellers
1st cost of 500
MC increase by 50,100,150,200,250.
Setup
9 Rounds
2 Fixed Price
2 Haggling
5 Choose your market
Times of 1 to 5 minutes
Receipts
Just there to annoy you
What we expected
Haggling takes time
Fewer Transactions per round when
haggling
Move toward fixed price market during
shorter rounds
Supply Demand Graph
3000
2500
Price
2000
Demand
1500
Supply
1000
500
0
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
41
46
51
56
Quantity
61
66
71
76
81
86
91
96
Equilibrium
Price: 1400
Quantity: 72
Demand Surplus: 38000
Supply Surplus: 56000
Total Surplus: 94000
Results
# of transactions
80
# of transactions
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
2
3
Length of Round
4
5
Profit per person
12000
10000
8000
fixed
6000
variable
4000
2000
0
1
2
3
Length of round
4
5
Number of Buyers and Sellers in the Fixed Market
8
7
6
5
Buyer
Seller
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
Length of Round
4
5
Time VS Market Participation
Overall Downward Trend
Indicates people tended towards haggling in
longer time periods
Regression
# of Fixed = -0.9 (length) +12.3
R square = 0.32
Excluding 5 minutes,
# of Fixed = -2 (length) +14.5
R square = 0.8
For buyers: # of Fixed = -1.2 (length) + 7
R-sq = 0.9
For sellers: # of Fixed = -0.8 (length) + 7.5 R-sq = 0.64
Total Profit per round
80000
70000
60000
Profit
50000
Fixed
40000
Variable
Total
30000
20000
10000
0
1
2
3
Round #
4
5
Total Profit
80000
60000
40000
Fixed
20000
Variable
0
1
2
Round
Profit
In first 4 rounds, highest overall profit
came from fixed price
Except for the 1 minute round, overall
profit remained stable over the 5 choosing
rounds
Problems with the Experiment
Data Collection
Incomplete Data
Incorrect Data
Confusion
Buyer/Seller matchups
Sample size small
Personal Desires
Short Haggling
Insignificant Time costs