Chapters 6, 7 & 8
Download
Report
Transcript Chapters 6, 7 & 8
Theory of the firm:
Profit maximization
Chapters 6, 7 & 8
1
Theory of the firm: Outline
2
Types of markets (degrees of competition)
Economic profit
Firm entry & exit behavior *
Production theory & diminishing marginal returns
Short-run unit cost curves *
Perfect competition
Profit maximization
Competitive market efficiency *
Market intervention
Efficiency-reducing interventions
Efficiency-enhancing interventions
Buyers and Sellers
3
Buyers
“Should I buy another unit?”
Answer: If the marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost
Sellers
“Should I sell another unit?
Answer: If the marginal revenue exceeds the marginal cost of
making it
Seller’s goal?
4
Maximize profit
Decisions:
What to produce (what market)?
How much to produce?
What inputs to use?
What price to charge?
Firm behavior depends on the competitive
environment they operate in.
Types of Markets (degrees of competition)
5
One firm
2-12 firms
many firms
Monopoly
Oligopoly
Monopolistic
Competition
many, many firms
Perfect
Competition
Basic principles
6
There are some basic ideas that apply to all types of
firms:
What “profit” means
Production theory & implications for unit costs
7
Economic profit
v.
Accounting profit
Profit Maximization
8
Accounting Profit
The difference between the total revenue a firm receives
from the sale of its product minus explicit costs
(“expenses”).
Economic Profit
The difference between the total revenue a firm receives
from the sale of its product minus all costs, explicit and
implicit.
Note: this includes opportunity cost, and is therefore
different than profit in a traditional accounting sense.
2 Types of Costs and 2 Types of Profit
9
Explicit Costs (“accounting costs” or “expenses”)
Actual payments made to factors of production and other
suppliers
Implicit Costs (opportunity costs)
All the opportunity costs of the resources supplied by the
firm’s owners
Eg: opportunity cost of owner’s time
Eg: opportunity cost of owner-invested funds
Two Types of Profit
10
Accounting Profit
Total Revenue – Explicit Costs
Economic Profit
Total Revenue – Explicit Costs – Implicit Costs
Economic Loss
An economic profit less than zero
The Difference Between Accounting Profit
and Economic Profit
11
The Difference Between Accounting Profit and
Economic Profit
12
Revenue – Acct Costs = Acct Profit
Revenue – Econ Costs = Econ Profit
Revenue – Explicit Costs = Acct Profit
Revenue – (Explicit + Implicit costs) = Econ Profit
Acct Profit – Implicit Costs = Econ Profit
If Acct Profit exactly = Implicit Costs => Econ Profit = 0,
and the firm is said to be earning a “normal profit”
Econ vs. Acct Profits
13
True or False: Economic profits are always less
than or equal to accounting profits.
TRUE
If some implicit costs exist…
economic cost > accounting cost
economic profit < accounting profit
(ie: we are subtracting more costs from the same revenue)
To Farm or Not To Farm?
14
Farmer Dave sells corn
his revenues are $22,000/yr
he pays $10,000/yr in explicit costs
he could earn $11,000 at another job he likes equally well
(implicit costs)
Dave’s economic profit is
$22,000 - $10,000 - $11,000 = $1,000
Dave is earning a positive economic profit
Dave is earning more than a normal profit
Example
15
After graduation you face the following job choice:
Option 1: IBM in RTP
Salary = $50K/year
Option 2: your own firm in Wilmington
You choose option 2 and withdraw $20,000 from
savings to start the business. Assume that you
could have earned 5% on that money.
Example continued
16
You chose option 2 and have the following info after 1 year:
1st year analysis:
Revenue = $50,000
Costs of inventory = $8,000
Labor expenses = $15,000
Rent = $12,000
Cost categories:
accounting
- inventory
- rent
- wages for worker
economic
- inventory
- rent
- wages for worker
- opp cost of Labor = $50,000
- opp cost of funds = $1,000
Example continued
17
Accounting profit
= 50 – 8 – 15 – 12 = 15
Economic profit
= 50 – 8 – 15 – 12 – 50 – 1 = -36
Your firm is earning negative economic profit
What does this mean?
Did you make a bad decision?
What will happen when firms in a market are
characterized by negative economic profits?
What if economic profits are > 0?
18
What does it mean when economic profits are
positive?
The firm owner is doing better than their next best alternative
The firm owner is more than covering opportunity costs
What will happen in markets where firms are
characterized by positive economic profits?
What if economic profits are = 0?
19
What does it mean when economic profits are zero?
The firm owner is doing just as well as their next best
alternative
The firm owner is exactly covering opportunity costs
What will happen in markets where firms are
characterized by zero economic profits?
“Normal Profit”
20
If market wages for your labor and market interest rates for
your funds were accurate reflections of the value of your
time and money, how much accounting profit should your
firm have earned?
What is a “normal profit” for your firm?
Normal profit = the (accounting) profit required to exactly
cover opportunity costs.
Normal profit = the accounting profit required to earn
exactly zero economic profit
Functions of Price
21
Where price is relative to average total costs of
production (ATC) will determine firm profits and
serve to allocate firm resources.
P > ATC => positive profits
P < ATC => negative profits
Changes in price may therefore reallocate resources.
Market Forces and Economic Profit
22
Positive Economic Profit means the firm
(owner) is more than covering opp costs
Doing better than the next best alternative
Price must be higher than ATC
Firms enter this industry
Supply increases
Price falls
Profits fall
Fig. 8.2
The Effect of Economic Profit on Entry
23
Market Forces and Economic Profit
24
Negative Economic Profit means the firm (owner)
is not covering opp costs
Doing worse than the next best alternative
Price must be below ATC
Firms exit this industry
Supply decreases
Price rises
Losses fall
Zero profit tendency of competitive markets
Fig. 8.3
The Effect of Economic Losses on Exit
25
26
Production
& the principle of diminishing
marginal returns
Production in the Short Run
27
Factors of Production
An input used in the production of a good or service
The “Short Run”
A period of time sufficiently short that at least some of
the firm’s factors of production are fixed
The “Long Run”
A period of time of sufficient length that all the firm’s
factors of production are variable
Law of Diminishing Returns
28
Fixed factor of production
An input whose quantity cannot be altered in the short
run. E.g. square footage of factory space
Variable factor of production
An input whose quantity can be altered in the short run.
E.g. labor
Law of Diminishing Returns
If one factor is variable and others are fixed: the
increased production of the good eventually requires ever
larger increases in the variable factor
As additional units of a variable input are added to fixed
amounts of other inputs, the marginal product of the
variable input will eventually decrease.
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
29
Q
Point of diminishing
marginal returns
Labor
MPL
Implications for Marginal Costs
30
Since productivity (MPL) typically first increases
and then decreases (at the point of DMR), what
will marginal costs do?
When productivity is rising, marginal costs
should be falling.
When productivity is falling, marginal costs
should be rising.
Unit costs measures are inversely related to
productivity measures
Types of Markets (degrees of competition)
31
One firm
2-12 firms
many firms
Monopoly
Oligopoly
Monopolistic
Competition
many, many firms
Perfect
Competition
Perfect Competition
32
Perfectly Competitive Market
Many sellers, selling a standardized product in an
environment with readily available information and
low-cost entry and exit.
No individual supplier has significant influence on the
market price of the product
Price taking behavior
33
Given that there are many firms all selling the
exact same product, what will the demand curve
for the product of one firm in a perfectly
competitive market look like?
Implications?
PC firms have no influence over the price at which they
sell their product
PC firms sell only a fraction of total market output
PC firms can sell as much output as they wish
The Demand Curve Facing Perfectly Competitive Firm
34
How to choose output to maximize profit?
35
Recall …
The Low-Hanging Fruit Principle
Suppliers first use the resources easiest-to-find
So, the price of the output must go up in order to compensate
for using harder-to-find resources
i.e. costs tend to rise when producers expand production in the
short-run (some inputs are fixed in the short-run)
Supply curves tend to be upward-sloping
Choosing Output
36
How much to produce?
The goal is to maximize profit
Profit = TR – TC
A perfectly competitive firm chooses to produce the output
level where profit is maximized
Cost-benefit principle & quantity decisions
A firm should increase output if marginal benefit (revenue)
exceeds the marginal cost
Choosing Output
37
Cost-Benefit Principle
Increase output if marginal benefit exceeds the marginal
cost
For a perfectly competitive firm
Marginal benefit = marginal revenue = price
Only true if demand is perfectly elastic
Cost-benefit principle for a price taker
Keep expanding as long as the price of the product is
greater than marginal cost
Choose the output where P = MC
Profit Maximizing Condition
38
Profit = TR – TC
Max Profit with respect to Q
d Profit / dQ = (dTR/ dQ) – (dTC/dQ) = 0
therefore maximum profit occurs where MR = MC
Profit Maximization
39
P
ATC = Total Cost / Q so, TC = ATC x Q
P > ATC means profit > 0
MC
ATC
D = MR
10 = P*
8
Q*
100
Quantity
Suppose Price Falls to Min ATC
40
P
P = ATC means profit = 0
MC
ATC
7 = P*
D = MR
Q*
Quantity
Suppose Price Falls below Min ATC
41
P
P < ATC means profit < 0
MC
ATC
7 = P*
D = MR
Q*
Quantity
Response to Economic Profits
Markets with excess profits attract resources
Price
$/bu
Corn Industry
S
Price
$/bu
Typical Corn Farm
MC
ATC
Economic
Profit
2
2
P
1.20
D
65
Quantity (M of bushels/year)
130
Quantity (000s of bushels/year)
Shrinking Economic Profits
Supply increases in the long run
Price
$/bu
Corn Industry
S
S'
Price
$/bu
Typical Corn Farm
MC
ATC
Economic
Profit
2
P
1.50
D
65 95
Quantity (M of bushels/year)
120 130
Quantity (000s of bushels/year)
Market Equilibrium
Eventually, the market saturates and firms earn zero
economic profits
Price
$/bu
Corn Industry
Price
$/bu
S
S'
Typical Corn Farm
MC
ATC
S"
2
1.50
1
D
65
115
Quantity (M of bushels/year)
P
90 130
Quantity (000s of bushels/year)
Response to economic losses
Resources leave the market
Price
$/bu
Corn Industry
Price
$/bu
Typical Corn Farm
MC
ATC
S
1.05
0.75
0.75
P
D
60
Quantity (M of bushels/year)
70 90
Quantity (000s of bushels/year)
Market Equilibrium
Again the market reaches a situation of zero economic profit
Price
$/bu
Price
$/bu
MC
ATC
S'
S
P
1
0.75
D
40 60
Quantity (M of bushels/year)
70 90
Quantity (000s of bushels/year)
Shut Down?
47
Perfectly competitive firms should produce where
MR (P) = MC, unless price is very low
If total revenue falls below variable cost, the best the
firm could do is shut down in the short run
i.e. if price is below average variable costs, the firm
loses money each time a unit of output is produced.
The best thing to do is produce nothing (shut the
doors and tell the employees to go home).
Perfectly Competitive Firm’s Supply Curve
48
The perfectly competitive firm’s supply curve is its
Marginal cost curve above minimum average variable cost
At every point along a market supply curve
Price measures what it would cost producers to expand
production by one unit
49
Competitive markets and efficiency
(and inefficiency)
The Domain of Markets
50
Free & competitive markets promote efficiency
But, markets cannot be expected to solve every problem (e.g.,
market economies do not guarantee a fair income distribution)
Realizing that markets cannot solve every problem
has led some critics to falsely conclude
that markets cannot solve any problem
Market Equilibrium and Efficiency
51
Pareto efficient (or just efficient)
Is a situation where there is no change possible that will help
some people without harming others
Exists when an economy has reached a point where
reallocating resources must harm one in order to help another
Occurs at equilibrium of perfectly competitive markets
Market Equilibrium and Efficiency
52
1.
2.
When a market is not in equilibrium:
P > P* = surplus -- QS > QD
P < P* = shortage -- QD > QS
In either case, the quantity exchanged is always
LESS THAN the true equilibrium quantity.
Hence, if a market is not in equilibrium, further
benefit-enhancing transactions are always
possible.
Adam Smith
53
Self-interest moves the economy
Consumers seek to maximize utility from purchases
Firms seek to maximize profit from production
It serves society’s interest
It is due to profit opportunities
With it, the entrepreneur “intends only his own gain,” he is “led by
an invisible hand” to promote an end which was no part of his
intentions
Prices (and price changes) serve to allocate resources to their
highest valued use
Invisible Hand
54
Invisible Hand Theory
The actions of independent, self-interested buyers and sellers
will often result in the most efficient allocation of resources
i.e. markets are (usually) efficient: the sum of consumer and
producer surplus are maximized
Economic surplus (net gains)
55
Total economic surplus
The sum of all the individual economic surpluses gained by buyers
and sellers participating in the market
Consumer Surplus
Economic surplus gained by the buyers of a product
Measured by the difference between their reservation price
and the price they pay
Producer Surplus
Economic surplus gained by the sellers of a product
Measured by the difference between the price they receive and
their reservation price
Total economic surplus in the market for milk
56
Surplus and Efficiency
57
Equilibrium price and quantity maximize total
economic surplus
Total economic surplus would be lower at any other price and
quantity combination
I.E., “waste” or unrealized gain occurs at any other price and
quantity combination
Other Goals
58
Efficiency is not the only goal
An equitable income distribution is a desirable goal for many
Argument that efficiency should be the first goal
Efficiency enables us to achieve all other goals to the fullest
possible extent
Efficiency minimizes waste
Markets and Social Optimum
59
If free and competitive markets are efficient, then
government intervention into those markets may be
inefficient.
Why then does government mess with markets?
Market equilibrium does not necessarily mean the
resulting allocation of resources is the best one viewed
from society’s perspective.
What is smart for one may be dumb for all
For example, some market activities that produce profits for some
may produce pollution (externalities) that adversely affects many
We’ll get back to this idea soon…
Some markets are inherently inefficient when left alone.
Government intervention can correct such inefficiencies
Markets and Social Optimum
60
How can government intervention make markets less
efficient?
How can government intervention make markets
more efficient?
Types of government intervention:
Taxation
Price controls
Import quota (and other trade restrictions)
The Market for Potatoes Without Taxes
61
The Effect of a $1 Pound Tax on Potatoes
62
The Deadweight Loss Caused by a Tax
63
DWL
64
CS pre-tax = ½ (3)(3,000,000) = $4,500,000
PS pre-tax = ½ (3)(3,000,000) = $4,500,000
CS post-tax = ½ (2.50)(2,500,000) = $3,125,000
PS post-tax = ½ (2.50)(2,500,000) = $3,125,000
Lost PS+CS = $2,750,000
Tax revenue = $1(2,500,000) = $2,500,000
DWL = $250,000
Taxes, Elasticity, and Efficiency
65
Deadweight loss is minimized if taxes are imposed
on goods and services that have relatively inelastic
supply or relatively inelastic demand.
Elasticity of Demand and the Deadweight Loss from a Tax
66
Elasticity of supply and the deadweight loss from a tax
67
Do all taxes decrease economic efficiency?
68
Consider a tax on land
Land supply is perfectly inelastic
DWL = $0
What other goods have high tax rates?
Booze
Cigarettes
Gasoline
Taxes, External Costs, and Efficiency
69
Taxing reduces the equilibrium quantity
Therefore, taxing activities that people tend to
pursue to excess can actually increase total economic
surplus (e.g., activities that cause pollution)
External costs & taxes that are efficiency-enhancing
70
Consider a market activity that generates harmful
side-effects on a 3rd party …
E.g. Pollution from a plant imposes costs on
anyone who lives near the plant
Does that firm’s supply curve accurately reflect the
full costs of production?
No. without regulation, the firm’s supply curve only
reflects the marginal costs of production.
The external costs are not included in these costs.
What if they were?
Market Equilibrium
71
P
S = MPC
$20 = P*MKT
D = MSB
Q*MKT
At P*MKT QD = QS = Q*MKT
CS + PS are maximized
Q
Market Equilibrium
72
The firm’s supply curve represents “private” or
“market-level” marginal costs of production
(MPC), and is used by the firm to make pricing and
output decisions.
If there are external costs (costs realized outside of
the market), the FULL costs of production would
be represented by a different curve = MSC
For example, suppose that each unit of output
causes $2 in damage to 3rd parties.
Social Equilibrium
73
P
MSC = MPC + 2
S = MPC
$21 = P*SOC
$20 = P*MKT
D = MSB
Q*SOC Q*MKT
Q
Social Efficiency
74
At P*MKT:
MSC > MSB
Q*MKT > Q*SOC the market “overproduces” the good
P*MKT < P*SOC the market “under-prices” the good
Market solution is therefore not efficient from
society’s standpoint
How can this inefficiency be corrected?
Social Efficiency
75
A tax equal to the marginal external cost ($2.00)
would serve to increase the firm’s MPC so that it
is coincident with the MSC function.
In other words, the tax brings the external cost
into the market.
= “internalizing the externality”
Social Equilibrium
76
P
New MPC = Old MPC + 2
S = MPC
$21 = P*SOC
D = MSB
Q*SOC Q*MKT
Q
Can markets create external benefits?
77
If markets can create costs on 3rd parties, can they
create benefits?
Sure.
Education.
Lawn care
House maintenance
Text: beekeeper adjacent to apple orchard
Will the market solution be efficient?
External
78 Benefits
P
S = MSC
P*MKT
MSB
D = MPB
Q*MKT Q*SOC
Q
External Benefits
79
In the case of external benefits, the market will
under-provide the good relative to the socially
optimal amount.
I.E. at Q*MKT MSB > MSC
How can this inefficiency be corrected?
Recall the solution to negative externality was a tax…
We should subsidize the positive externality generating
activity.
Naturalist Questions
80
Why are gasoline taxes so high (relative to other
goods)?
Why aren’t gasoline taxes higher (as in other
nations)?
Why do communities have zoning laws?