Transcript Slide 1

STR 421
Economics of
Competitive Strategy
Michael Raith
Spring 2007
Today’s class
2. Value creation and competitive advantage
2.1 Value creation and positioning
2.2 Friday: Sustainability of a competitive advantage
Value
 Value Created
= Buyer’s benefit - Cost of inputs
= B - C = (B - P)
= Consumer Surplus
+
+
(P - C)
Profit
 The price P determines how much of the value created
is captured by the seller, and how much by the buyer.
Value and competition
 Example: pricing of Glaxo’s Paxil vs. generic
 Suppose Glaxo’s MC=100, generic’s MC=90
 Two types of customers
– Type 1: B for Paxil = 150, B for generic = 110
– Type 2: B for Paxil = 120, B for generic = 100
 Both prefer brand, but type 1 has stronger brand
preference
 What prices should we expect to see?
Suppose only customers
of type 1
 Before expiry of patent, Glaxo can charge up to P=150
 After expiry of patent, Glaxo and generic compete in
making “consumer surplus bids” B-P
 Prices fall until Pgen=90, where buyers get surplus of 20
 Glaxo can still charge 150 – 20 = 130
– Or slightly less and get all of the business
Suppose only customers
of type 2
 Before expiry of patent, Glaxo can charge up to P=120
 After expiry of patent, prices fall until Pgen=90, where
buyers get surplus of 10
 Glaxo can charge up to 120 – 10 = 110
– Or slightly less and get all of the business
Suppose both types present in
market
 After expiry of patent, Glaxo can still price generic out
of market with price below 110
– Merck priced Zocor below generic after expiry in 2006
 More likely: equilibrium where
– Generic charges 100 and sells only to type 2
– Glaxo charges 150-10=140 and sells only to type 1
 Less business but much higher margin
Conclusions
1. A firm’s competitive position depends on B and C.
Price is determined through competition
2. With identical buyers (1 or 2), what matters is added
value
– Paxil’s value B – C is 50 or 20; generic’s value is 20 or 10
– Generic has no added value, gets no business in equilibrium
3. “Vertical product differentiation”: customers with
different WTP for quality sort themselves to high/low
(perceived) quality products
Customer heterogeneity and
product differentiation
 For most products, customers’ preferences and
products offered differ along many dimensions
– Products are horizontally differentiated if different customers
rank products in different ways
– Products are vertically differentiated if all customers rank
products in the same way
 Different firms offer differentiated products because
customers have heterogeneous preferences for product
attributes or quality
Dimensions of a company’s market
position
 Horizontal: type(s) of products offered
– Geographical location
– Product attributes: e.g. beverage vs. food cans
 Vertical: level of (perceived) quality
 Scope: broad or narrow product range
– Broad strategy advantageous if there are scale or scope
economies to exploit
– Often chosen by market leaders as they grow over time, often
not an option for new companies
(Horizontal) differentiation
relaxes rivalry
 Recall: “Bertrand trap” result assumes homogeneous
products
 With differentiated products:
– a firm cannot steal all customers from rivals by undercutting
their price only slightly
 Price cutting stops where gain from increase in demand is
outweighed by decrease in margin
 In equilibrium, prices above MC and positive profits!
 See differentiated Bertrand model, Linesville market in
BDSS Ch. 6 (Hotelling model)
The vertical dimension:
The seller’s cost-quality tradeoff
“Productivity
Frontier”
Cost
Inefficient
Efficient, benefit advantage
Efficient, cost advantage
Quality
The buyer’s price-quality trade-off
Price-quality indifference curves:
Price
Quality
Different buyers have different
WTP for quality:
Price
High valuation of quality
Low valuation
of quality
Quality
Vertically differentiated industry: firms offer
different levels of quality, targeting groups of
customers that differ in their WTP for quality:
Price, cost
Quality
Two related goals in choosing the
right position
1. Choose what you want to do
– choose position on the frontier: cost or differentiation strategy?
– choose “horizontal” position: which segment(s) of market?
– Be different! Most important way to avoid Bertrand trap
2. Reach or push out the productivity frontier: do most
efficiently whatever you do
– Strategic fit: all activities tailored to strategy
 Competitive Advantage =
– ability of a firm to outperform its industry
– …in its segment of the market