Recyclable Resources: Minerals, Paper, Glass & More
Download
Report
Transcript Recyclable Resources: Minerals, Paper, Glass & More
Recyclable Resources:
Minerals, Paper, Glass &
More
Man is creative. But he has not been able to
use his powers to increase & multiply the
endowments, as yet. He has only destroyed.
Once used energy resources dissipate into heat
energy – cannot be recycled
Other resources: retain their physical & chemical
properties during use – can be recycled/reused
How much recycling is efficient?
Will market mechanism decide it?
How is efficient allocation different over time
between recyclable & non-recyclable resources?
What impact does product durability has on
allocation of virgin & recyclable materials?
Let’s find how efficient market’s work for
depletable & recyclable resources & then use
this as benchmark. Assume: finite resources.
Efficient allocation of recyclable resources:
initially reliance on virgin resources as they are
cheaper – later ↑ingly difficult to extract – then
to lower grade – then import
Technological progress - ∴ lower grade ore ≠
↑cost - difficult to extract ∴ price rises
Same time: cost of disposing product migration to urban areas
Slowly, land scarce - burial of waste ↑ expensive
–concerns over evn effects on water supplies &
eco effects on value of surrounding land buried waste acceptable
↑ Cost of virgin material & ↑ in waste disposal
recycling attractive – its also an alternative to
both
Virgin ore - products costly - ∴ demand for
recycled goods – “composition of demand
effect” – additional incentive to return used
product
Purity of recycled goods plays key role
Recycling
Will ↑ as virgin ore & disposable costs ↑
Costs many: mainly transport + processing significant – labour cost – collecting, sorting &
processing scrap is labour intensive –
Scrap as input – has evn consequences –
compliance with rules adds to cost
Design products to facilitate recycling - ‘stamp’
Recycling is adding more to resource – depend
on it longer than on non-recyclable -
If recycling rate is 100%, resource flow is infinite
If 100 units of resource are in a product with
one year of useful life. After one year 90% of
resource is recovered & reused – next year 90%
of that i.e. 81 units can be recovered & reused
If stock is A & recovery rate is α total amount
used would be = A+Aα + Aα2 + Aα3 ….. This is
= A/ (1- α)
For non-recyclable resources α = 0
Efficient economy strikes balance between
consumption of depletable & recycled material
The Strategic Material problem
US: oil imports that of strategic importance – a
few suppliers – true social cost > market price
Policy: tariff on imports & use proceeds for
stockpile
Vulnerability of nation (importing) depends on
(1) severity of shortfall (2) its ability to cope
with shortfall (by substituting or suffering)
Larger disruptions (> 35%) can have serious
impact
Tilton: 1985: examined substitution effects of
rapid rise of tin prices during 1970s
Waste disposal & pollution damage
Treatment of waste by producers & consumers
– biases in market balance between recycling &
use of virgin ores – disposal cost is a key in
determining efficient amount of recycling
Failure to bear full cost of disposal shows bias
towards virgin material & away from recycling
Method of financing disposal of potentially
recyclable waste affects the level of recycling
Disposal cost & efficiency:
cost of recycling > price of recycled material
sold. Loss?
Must understand relationship of marginal
disposal cost to efficient level of recycling.
Example: cost of recycling $20 p t , sold for $10
per ton – inefficient?
Town is avoiding cost of disposal = $20 p t . ∴
benefits = $20 for avoiding disposal+$10 resale
= $30 p t & cost $20 ∴ efficient recycling
venture
Recyclable Waste
Old scrap & New scrap
Old scrap: recovered from consumers -transport
cost very imp - market works efficiently - doesn’t
count marginal social cost of disposing ∴
market away from recycling old scrap & towards
the use of virgin materials
New scrap: generated during production –
requires no transport cost - under control of
producer - design a product for scrap minimum processing - guarantee of
homogeneity - works efficiently
No direct relation between size of trash & fee
MC to homeowners of throwing one more unit of
trash is negligible, but to society it is not.
$/unit
MCp
% recycled
disposal
0%
100%
$/unit
MCR
MCs
Qp Qs
100%
0%
Disposal Cost & Scrap Market
How will market respond if all are to bear the
true marginal disposal cost?
Effect on supply of materials to be recycled –
consumers paid for discarded products –
material to recycling centres – ∴ supply ↑ economies of scale - ↓ AC of processing +
more recycled materials
C ↑ due to price fall & Use of virgin ore ↓
∴ Correct inclusion of disposal cost would tend
to ↑ amount of recycling & extend life of
depletable- recyclable resources
Subsidies on Raw Materials
Are troubling source of inefficiencies – they
take bias away from recycled inputs - raw
materials are artificially cheap & can inefficiently
undermine the market for recycled inputs
Public land’s prices are low as compared to
market – people don’t receive true value for
mining services provided by public lands –
subsidy is lowering the cost of extracting the
raw materials
Corrective Public Policies
Such inappropriate pricing creates improper
incentives misallocation ?
Volume pricing
Refund system
Deposit refund
Disposal & recycling charges at the time of sale
Tax for using virgin material
Pollution Damage
If environmental costs are added to virgin
material – Price rise – leftward shift of supply
curve - ∴ use more of recycled material
Disposal cost: external environmental costs –
odours, pests, contamination of water…
Govt. regulates landfills for public safety –
locating the facility is difficult
Impose host fees
Sometimes package is bigger than the product
Tax Treatment of Minerals
Some minerals get subsidy
Severance tax
Durability of the product
Three ways of obsolescence:
Functional
Fashion
Durability
Market mechanism automatically creates
pressures for recycling & reuse in right direction
– ↑ disposal cost & ↑ scarcity ↑ demand for
recycling