Transcript Document

Managerial
Economics
Eighth Edition
Truett + Truett
Chapter 9: Monopolistic
Competition, Oligopoly,
and Related Topics
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7/16/2015
Slides by Jim Witsmeer
1
Introduction




7/16/2015
Should a monopoly
advertise?
Should a supplier in perfect
competition advertise?
Does either firm have to
compete for market share?
What is product
differentiation is it real or
perceived?
2
Definitions


Oligopoly is a market with a few
sellers of the same product
actively competing for market
share.
Monopolistic competition is a
market with many firms selling
similar products with some
differentiation.
The difference relates to how much
rivalry there is among firms.
7/16/2015
3
Topics of Discussion


7/16/2015
Monopolistic Competition
Oligopoly
 Duopoly
 Barriers to Entry
 Price Rigidity Without
Collusion
 Price Leadership
 Efficient firm
 Dominant firm
 Perfect Collusion: Cartels
4
Market Share Curve



Market share curve (Ma) is
firm’s demand curve when all
firms change price.
Firms operate at intersection
of its demand and market
share curves.
In short run it may be
possible for firm to move
along Di, but eventually,
similar conditions will result in
similar prices for all firms.
140
100
80
60
Di
40
20
Ma
0
-20
-40
7/16/2015
Equilibrium
Point
120
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
MRi
5
Monopolistic Competition in
the Short Run



Firm’s Short-Run
160
Equilibrium
140
Firm must adjust estimate
120
of d so it intersects M
100
where SMC=MR.
80
If where d intersects M,
firm’s SMC is not equal to 60
MR, firm will have to make 40
further adjustments (re20
estimate d or, perhaps,
0
make some changes in
product differentiation to -20
move M).
-40
7/16/2015
SMC
d
M
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
MR
6
Monopolistic Competition
in the Long Run


Long-Run
Equilibrium of the
Firm
Free entry assures
the firm’s
economic profit
will only be normal
over the long run.
7/16/2015
7
Duopoly: An Oligopoly
with only two competitors



7/16/2015
Several economic theories have
attempted to define the optimum
strategy in a duopolistic competition
(price war).
Most scenarios in the long-run result
in both competitors losing and one
or both going out of business.
In this situation a strategy of
collusion or cooperative pricing for
mutual benefit is optimal.
8
Barriers to Market Entry







7/16/2015
Entry-limit pricing
Excess capacity and economies
of scale
Capital requirements
Product differentiation or brand
recognition
Criminal intimidation
Government controls
Sales and distribution networks
9
Price Rigidity Without Collusion



The kinked demand
curve occurs when the
competing firms follow a
price decrease but not an
increase.
The kink is the
equilibrium point.
Firms with differing costs
(profits) will operate at
the same quantity/price.
7/16/2015
10
Rising Prices with a kinked
demand curve


If costs rise to the extent
shown here (MC2), then
the firm must raise price to
P2
To maximize profits and
wait for the rest of the
firms to follow which will
move the kink to F and
rotate the demand and MR
curves adjusting the
maximum profit and
increasing sales to F.
7/16/2015
11
Sample Problem
Initial Equilibrium
TR =QP=101000= $10,000
25
TC  1500 3Q  .0025Q
20

2
T = $10,000-$7,000 = $3,000
 Maximum Profit
PM  30 .02Q
15
Pd  15 .005Q
dTRd
MRd 
 15 .01Q
dQ
TC=1500+3800+.0025800
2
dSTC
 3  .005Q
dQ
10
5
TR = QP = 11800 = $8,800
SMC 
0
-5 0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
-10
-15
MRM 
dTRM
 30 .04Q
dQ
-20
T = $8,800-$5,500 = $3,300
7/16/2015
12
Tacit Collusion



7/16/2015
An informal type of coordination
among firms.
Formal Collusive agreements are
illegal, although U. S. firms have
been permitted to agree on export
pricing.
Firms may get away with informal
collusion, but they could be
prosecuted under antitrust laws.
13
Price Leadership
Efficient Firm


When the lead firm
changes price
others will follow
shortly.
Firm b has
maximum profit at
Pb but must adjust
to Pa to sustain
market share.
7/16/2015
14
Price Leadership
Dominant Firm
The dominant share of the market is so large that competitors
must accept the set market price as in perfect competition.
Dominant Firm
Entire Market
The demand curve
Ss =  MCs
for the dominant
firm is obtained by
subtracting the
quantity supplied
by small firms
from the total
market quantity
demanded.
The dominant firm selects Pe, which is the MR curve for small firms,
who supply QS’.
7/16/2015

QL  Qs  QM
15
Sample Problem
Dominant Firm
Entire Market
If small firm
600
supply is:
SS
500
QS=0.9P+150 and
market demand is:
400
QM=1403-2.6P than MCL
300
demand for the
QM
200
DM
dominant firm is
DL
MRL 100
QS Q
QL
QL = QM-QS or
L
0
QL=1253-3.5P
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
00 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

We can find TR = Q*P and MR = dTR/dQ. The MC is estimated to be
constant at $260 so that the maximum profit for the dominant firm at
MC=MR is at the point indicated and divides the market into 171.5 units
for the dominant firm and 428 units for the small firms collectively.
7/16/2015
16
The Cartel: Perfect Collusion

To maximize profit, cartel managers must allocate
production based on the rule of marginal cost,
which dictates that MR = MCA = MCB = …= MCn for
all participants. This is the ideal and is sometimes
modified in the short run to maintain unity.
7/16/2015
17
Sample Problem

A three member cartel estimates the market demand function
for its product to be Qc = 1660 – 200Pc. The three members have
marginal cost functions as follows: MCi = .25 +.000125Qi , MCs =
.60 + .0002Qs and MCu = .15 + .00015Qu. The sum of these
equals the marginal cost function: MCc = 0.305 + .000508Qc.
The cartel marginal revenue is: MRc = dTR/dQ = 8.3 - .001Q.
Setting MR=MC and solving for Qc gives us a quantity of 5300
units and MR = 3.0. Substituting this value into the cartel
demand equation yields a price of $5.65. This divides among
the cartel by setting all of their marginal costs equal to 3.0 and
solving for their respective quantity allocations.



MC i  .25 
MC s  0.6 
MC u  .15 
Qi 
 2200 Qs 
 1200 Qu 
 1900
.00125
0.2
.015
7/16/2015
18
Cartel Problem (graphically)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
SMCs
SACu
Pc
Pc
0
1000
Qu2000
Pc
PROFIT
PROFIT
SMCu
SACi
SACs
MRs
MRu
3000
UWAQ
0
4000
Qs2000 3000
SHERAN
1000
4000
0
PROFIT
SMCi
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
i2
1
0
MR
Qi3000
IRUN
1000
Pc
2000
4000
0
Dc
MRc
MCc
Qc 6000
CARTEL
2000
4000
8000
Allocations are made to the members in accordance with the
rule of marginal cost. The lower cost producers receive the
largest allocation and the largest profit.
7/16/2015
Qc  Qi  Qs  Qu
19
End of Chapter 9
7/16/2015
Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons,
Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or
translation of this work beyond that
permitted in Section 117 of the United
States copyright Act without the express
written permission of the copyright owner
is unlawful. Request for further
information should be addressed to the
Permissions Department, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make backup copies for his/her own use only and not
for resale. The publisher assumes no
responsibilities for errors, omissions, or
damages, caused by the use of the
information contained herein.
20