6.-triad-testsx
Download
Report
Transcript 6.-triad-testsx
Triad tests
Collecting and making similarity data
Background
The triad test: from personal construct
psychology and the repertory grid developed
by George Kelly in 1955.
Adopted by cognitive psychologists and
anthropologists to measure similarities
among pairs of objects.
Informants respond to the same set of cues and data
can be compared across individuals.
Kelly, G. A. 1955. The psychology of personal constructs.New York: Norton.
Triad tests
In a triad test, you show people three things and tell
them to:
“Choose the one that doesn’t fit” or
“Choose the two that seem to go together best,” or
“Choose the two that are the same.”
The “things” can be photographs, dried plants, or 3 x 5
cards with names of people on them.
DOLPHIN
MOOSE
WHALE
SHARK
DOLPHIN
MOOSE
Dolphin is the odd item in triad 1 if people are
thinking about size.
It’s moose if people are thinking land vs. sea.
People often ask “What do you mean by things being
‘the same’ or ‘fitting together’?”
Tell them that you are interested in what they think that
means.
By doing this for all triples from a list of things or
concepts, you can explore differences in cognition
among individuals, and among cultures and
subcultures.
First use in anthropology
Romney and D’Andrade (1964) presented
people with triads of American kinship terms
and asked them to choose the term that was
most dissimilar in each triad.
For the triad “father, son, nephew,” 67%
selected “nephew” as the most different of the
three items; 22% chose “father.”
Romney, A. K., and R. G. D’Andrade, eds. 1964. Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. In
Transcultural studies in cognition. American Anthropologist 66 (3, part 2, entire issue): 146–70
Ask people to explain their choices
For the triad “grandson, brother, father,” one informant
said that a “grandson is most different because he is
moved down further.”
There’s a lot of cultural wisdom in that statement.
Bilingualism and St. Lucian disease terms
Does cognition of disease terms vary with
bilingual proficiency in St. Lucia?
52 bilingual English-Patois speakers and 10
monolingual Patois speakers.
Here is the formula for calculating the
number of triples in a set of items:
With 9 disease terms, there are 84 possible
triads.
Lieberman, D., and W. W. Dressler. 1977. Bilingualism
and cognition of St. Lucian disease terms. Medical
Anthropology 1:81–110.
n(n -1)(n - 2)
6
For the bilingual informants:
Two triad tests, a week apart, one in Patois and one in
English.
They also measured how bilingual their informants were.
For the monolingual informants”
The 10 monolingual Patois informants were simply given
the triad test.
There are n(n-1)/2 pairs in a set of items
For 9 items, there are 9(8)/2=36 pairs of items
Count the number of times that each of the 36 possible
pairs of terms was chosen as most alike in the 84
triads.
Each term in a triad test appears n-1 times, and each
pair appears n-2 times, so they divided the total by
seven.
Triads as similarities
This produced a similarity coefficient, varying between
0.0 and 1.0, in increments of 0.14 (1/7) for each
possible pair of disease terms.
The larger the coefficient for a pair of terms, the closer in
meaning are the two terms.
They analyzed these data for English-dominant, Patoisdominant, and monolingual Patois speakers.
When Patois-dominant and English-dominant
informants took the triad test in English, their cognitive
models of similarities among diseases was similar.
When Patois-dominant speakers took the Patoislanguage triad test, however, their cognitive model was
similar to that of monolingual Patois informants.
The take-away:
Patois-dominant bilinguals hold on to two psychological
models about diseases and switch back and forth,
depending on the language they are speaking.
English-dominant bilinguals employ the same cognitive
model of disease terms, whichever language they
speak.
BIBDs – Balanced incomplete block designs
Typically, the terms for a triad test are generated by a
free list.
Free lists of illnesses, ways to prevent pregnancy,
advantages of breast-feeding, places to go on vacation,
and so on easily produce 60 items or more.
Even an abbreviated list for a pile sort may be 30 items.
With just 9 terms, there are 84 stimuli in a triad test.
For 15 items, the number of decisions an informant has
to make jumps to 455.
At 20 items, it’s a mind-numbing 1,140.
Burton and Nerlove’s solution
Balanced incomplete block designs take advantage of
the fact that there is a lot of redundancy in a triad test.
For 4 items, there are 6 pairs. If you ask “Which of
these two foods is more nutritious?” the informant sees
each pair just once.
Burton, M. L., and S. B. Nerlove. 1976. Balanced design for triad tests. Social Science
Research 5:247–67.
Recall that in a triad test informants see each triad
n(n–1)(n–2)/6 times
and each pair n–2=2 times.
With 84 triads for 9 items, each pair of items appears 7
times.
Redundancy and lambda designs
This redundancy lets us reduce the number of triads in
a triads test.
If each pair appears once (a lambda 1 design), then
only 12 triads are needed.
If each pair appears twice (a lambda 2 design), then 24
triads are needed.
For a lambda 1 design, each pair of items in
the similarity matrix gets a score of either 1 or
0.
For a lambda 2 design, each pair of items in
the similarity matrix is 0, .5. or 1.
For 10 items, a lambda 2 design requires 30 triads; for
13 items, 52 triads; for 15 items, 70 triads; for 19 items,
114 triads; and for 25 items, 200 triads.
Here are the solutions from Burton and Nerlove for 9
and 10 items.
Balanced Incomplete Block Designs for Triad Tests Involving 9 and 10 Items
For 9 items, 24 triads are needed,
as follows:
Items
For 10 items, 30 triads are
needed, as follows:
1, 5, 9
2, 3, 8
4, 6, 7
1, 2, 3
4, 5, 6
7, 8, 9
Items
1, 2, 3
2, 5, 8
3, 7, 4
2, 6, 9
1, 3, 4
5, 7, 8
1, 4, 7
2, 5, 9
3, 6, 8
4, 1, 6
5, 8, 7
6, 4, 9
9, 5, 2
10, 6, 7
1, 3, 5
3, 7, 9
2, 4, 5
1, 6, 9
2, 4, 8
7, 9, 1
8, 10, 2
2, 7, 6
3, 8, 9
1, 6, 8
4, 8, 9
3, 5, 7
1, 5, 8
9, 3, 10
10, 6, 5
4, 2, 10
5, 6, 3
1, 2, 4
6, 1, 8
3, 5, 6
1, 2, 7
6, 8, 9
7, 10, 3
8, 1, 10
2, 6, 8
2, 3, 6
7, 9, 2
2, 4, 8
8, 4, 7
4, 9, 5
5, 7, 1
9, 10, 1
10, 5, 4
3, 4, 9
BIBDs reduce accuracy
In a L1 design, each pair of items occurs in the context
of just one other item.
For dog, parakeet, whale, many people pick whale,
even though dog and parakeet are not that similar.
Thus the similarity between two items is defined by a
single, third item.
Steps in making a triads test
1. Identify domain.
2. Do key informant interviewing /free listing.
3. Select short list from the total list.
4. Choose a BIBD or use a complete triad test.
5. Make the triad tests using Anthropac (randomize to
eliminate order effects).
6. Collect triad data.
7. Score the data and unrandomize if necessary
Instructions for data entry in the Anthropac manual
Procedure in Anthropac
Tell Anthropac the list of items you have.
Select a design (e.g. L1, L2).
Tell it the number of informants you want to interview.
Anthropac prints out a randomized triad test, one for
each informant.
Randomizing the order in which the triads appear to
informants eliminates order-effects.
Anthropac unrandomizes the data on import.
Plusses and minuses of triad tests
Triad tests are easy to create with Anthropac,
easy to administer, and easy to score.
Use with relatively few items in a domain.
In literate societies, most people respond to 200
triads in <.5hr, but it’s boring.
Literate informants easily handle L2 tests with
15 items and 70 triads.
People prefer—even like—to do pile sorts, but
pile sorts have their own problems.