Management of Serrated Polyps of Colorectum

Download Report

Transcript Management of Serrated Polyps of Colorectum

Management of Serrated
Polyps of Colorectum
Eric YF Cheung
Department of Surgery, NDH
Three messages
Serrated polyp-adenocarcinoma sequence
 Malignant risk of serrated polyps of
colorectum
 Management and Surveillance: New
guidelines needed

Serrated polyps—An overview
Colorectal polyps

Adenoma



Tubular adenoma
Tubulovillous adenoma
Villous adenoma
Hyperplastic polyp/Serrated polyp
 Harmatoma



Juvenile polyp
Peutz-Jeghers polyps
Inflammatory polyp
 Lymphoid aggregates

Traditionally
viewed as
innocuous
Serrated polyps (WHO)

Hyperplastic polyp (HP): Small distal
Microvesicular (MVHP)
 Globet-cell rich (GCHP)
 Mucin-poor


Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA)


Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA)


Distal
Proximal, large
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with
J Gastroenterol
2012; 107:1315–1329
dysplasia (SSAAmw/
dysplasia)
Incidence of Colorectal Polyps
Serrated polyp-Adenocarcinoma
sequence
Three pathways to CRC

Adenoma


Sessile Serrated Adenoma (SSA)


Adenoma-carcinoma sequence: Chromosomal
instability
Serrated polyp-carcinoma sequence (20%
CRC)
Traditional Serrated Adenoma (TSA)
Alternative/ fusion pathway
 Less well characterized

Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1315–1329
BJS 2011; 98: 1685-1694
Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2008; 37:25-46
Serrated polyp-Carcinoma
sequence
Initiation
Hypermethylation of promotor silencing
of DNA mismatch repair gene MLH-1
Microsatellite instability
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1315–1329
Malignant Risk of Serrate Polyps
Serrated Polyps and CRC
Genetic and pathological study ~
20% CRC from serrated pathway
 Large and proximal serrated polyps 
more synchronous advanced
neoplasia/CRC
 Sessile serrated adenomas  high
metachronous CRC rate

METHOD
•3121 asymptomatic patients (aged 50–75 years) who had screening colonoscopies;
1371 had subsequent surveillance.
RESULTS
•Patient with proximal ND-SP were more likely to have advanced neoplasia (17.3%
vs 10.0%; OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.33-2.70).
•Patients with large ND-SP were also more likely to have synchronous advanced
neoplasia (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.7-6.65).
During surveillance,
•patients with baseline proximal ND-SP and no neoplasia were more likely to have
neoplasia compared with subjects who did not have polyps (OR, 3.14; 95% CI,1.596.20).
•Among patients with advanced neoplasia at baseline, those with proximal ND-SP
were more likely to have advanced neoplasia during surveillance (OR, 2.17; 95% CI,
1.03-4.59).
Serrated polyps and
metachronous tumour
Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:927–934
•The incidence of subsequent CRCs was significantly higher in SSA patients
than in control patients with HP (12.5% vs. 1.8%) and AP (12.5% vs.
1.8%). All of the subsequent CRCs or APs with HGD developed in the
proximal colon. Four of the 5 CRCs demonstrated a high microsatellite
instability phenotype.
•We conclude that SSAs are high-risk lesions, with 15% of the SSA patients
developing subsequent CRCs or APs with HGD.
•support close endoscopic follow-up in patients harboring SSA
Management and Surveillance
Treatment
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1315–1329




Complete removal of all serrated lesions
 Except diminutive sigmoid/rectal lesions
Multiple diminutive (<5mm) serrated appear lesion should
be randomly Bx
Piecemeal resection/ possible incomplete removal 
surveillance colonoscopy 3-6 months
Surgical resection: not endoscopically ressectable,
numerous large serrated lesion of proximal colon, Serrated
polyposis syndrome
Current Surveillance strategies
Guidelines based on observational
studies that link baseline CLN findings
to risk of advanced adenoma at FU
 For serrated lesions


US
 After
removal of HP  10 years interval
 No recommendation for SSA/TSA

Europe
 HP:
10 years
 SSA/TSA  consider as adenoma
Why we need updated
guidelines?

Endoscopic detection is operator
dependent and variable

SSA is hard to detect and easy to miss
Serrated adenoma are likely to grow
faster then adenoma
 Serrated adenomas are responsible for a
large portion of interval CRC

Interval Colon Cancer
RESULT
MSI was found in 30.4% of interval cancers
compared with 10.3% of noninterval cancers (P
= .003). After adjusting for age, interval
cancers were 3.7 times more likely to show MSI
than noninterval cancers (95% CI, 1.5–9.1).
Conceptual framework
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1315–1329
Take home messages
Some serrated polyps have malignant
potential e.g. SSA/TSA
 Grows quicker then traditional
adenomas
 All should be removed except
diminutive HP in rectosigmoid region
 Current surveillance recommends
treating SSA/TSA as adenoma


Modify according to size, site and
numbers
The End
Q&A
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et. al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: Review and
recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1315-1329
Leonard DF, Dozois EJ, Smyrk TC, Suwanthanma W. et. al. Endoscopic and surical management of
serrated colonic polyps. BJS 2011;98:1685-1694
East JE, Saunders BP, Jass JR. Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenoma
of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history and clinical management.
Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2008;37:25-46
Bauer VP, Papaconstantinou HT. Management of serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Clin
Colon Rectal Surg 2008;21L273-279
Groff RJ, Nash R, Ahnen DJ. Significance of serrated polyps of the colon. Current Gastroenterology
Reports 2008;10:490-498
Liang JJ, Alrawi S, Tan D. Nomenclature, molecular genetics and clinic significance of the precursor
lesions in the serrated polyp pathway of colorectal carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol 2008;1:317-324
Snover DC, Jass JR, Fenoglio-Presiser CF, Batts KP. Serrated polyps of the large intestine. Am J Clin
Pathol 2005;124:380-391
O’Brien MJ. Hyperplastic and serrated polyps of the colorectum. Gastroenterol Clin N Am
2007;36:947-968
O’Brien MJ, Yang S, Mack C et. al. Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation
phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate
pathways to distint colorectal carcinoma endpoints. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1491-1501
Lu F, Niekerk DW, Owen D et. al. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenoma of the
colorectum: An increased risk of subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol
2010;34:927–934)
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Legget B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.
Gastroenterology 2010; 138:2088-2100
Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et. al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:1259-1264
Schrein WA, Weiss DG, Liberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated
polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010; 139:14971502
Lu F, Niekerk DW, Owen D et. al. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the
colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Pathol
2010;34:927-934
Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S et. al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers.
Gastroenterology 2006;131:1700-1705
Spring KJ, Zhao ZZ, Karamatic R et. al. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenoma with BRAF
mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology
2006;131:1400-1407
Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Couko JA. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk
colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-2664
Hiraoka S, KatoJ, Fujiki S et. al. The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal
cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 139:1503-1510