Biomereology_Montrea.. - Buffalo Ontology Site

Download Report

Transcript Biomereology_Montrea.. - Buffalo Ontology Site

Biomereology
From Formal Ontology to
Biomedical Ontology
Barry Smith
http://ifomis.org
1
2
Mereology as Formal Ontology
Logical Investigations (1900-01)
Investigation III:
On the Theory of Wholes and Parts
3
Husserl
Leśniewski
Kotarbiński
Tarski
Grzegorczyk
Woodger
4
Cantor
Leśniewski
Frege
late Carnap
early Tarski
(geometry of solids)
Grzegorczyk
(mereotopology)
set-theory as
principal instrument
of formal ontology
mereology as
principal instrument
of formal ontology
5
Hilbert
late Tarski
Carnap
Putnam
contemporary
model-theoretic
semantics
Leśniewski
Russell
early Tarski
Woodger
contemporary
realist ontology
6
For Frege, Russell, Leśniewski,
Wittgenstein, Quine …
logic is a zoology of facts
formal theories are theories of reality
with one intended interpretation: the world
tragically
after starting off on the right road
7
8
Logic took a wrong turn
9
(Tarski)
Carnap, Putnam, Goodman, etc.:
Forget reality!
Lose yourself in ‘models’!
“internal realism” ...
10
Hilbert
late Tarski
Carnap
Putnam
Leśniewski
Russell
Wittgenstein
Quine
OLD: Logic as
Language
11
Hilbert
late Tarski
Carnap
Putnam
Leśniewski
Russell
Wittgenstein
Quine
NEW: Logic as
Calculus
12
13
Hilbert
late Tarski
Carnap
Putnam
Leśniewski
Russell
Wittgenstein
Quine
OLD: Set-theorybased-modeltheoretic semantics
... possible worlds
blah blah
14
Hilbert
late Tarski
Carnap
Putnam
Leśniewski
Russell
early Tarski
Woodger
NEW: Extreme
Mereotopological
Bio-Ontological Realism
15
16
Husserl + Leśniewski
realist mereology-based ontology
+ universals
+ topology
+ relations
+ dependent entities
17
Formal Ontology vs. Formal Logic
Formal ontology deals with formal
ontological structures
Formal logic deals with formal logical
structures
‘formal’ = domain-neutral
(obtain in all material spheres of reality)
18
Formal Ontology
the theory of those ontological structures
(such as part-whole, universal-particular)
which apply to all domains whatsoever
19
Formal Ontology vs. Formal Logic
Formal ontology deals with the
interconnections of things
with objects and properties, parts and
wholes, relations and collectives
20
Formal-Ontological Categories
object
state of affairs
unity
plurality
boundary
dependent part
independent part
relation
are able to form complex structures in nonarbitrary, law-governed ways
21
From Formal Ontology
to Biomedical Ontology
22
Scales of anatomy
Organism
Organ
10-1 m
Tissue
Cell
10-5 m
Organelle
Protein
DNA
10-9 m
23
Complexity of biological structures
30,000 genes in human
200,000 proteins
100s of cell types
100,000s of disease types
1,000,000s of biochemical pathways
(including disease pathways)
A new golden age of classification
24
A new golden age of classification
central importance of classes /
types / kinds / universals / species
of independent objects
dependent objects
processes
25
Different scientific
cultures / terminologies
immunology
genetics
cell biology
26
Fleck on Thought-Styles
the general structure of a thoughtcollective entails that the communication
of thoughts within the collective,
irrespective of content or logical
justification, leads for sociological reasons
to the reinforcement of the thought
structure
27
The problem of the unity of science
The logical positivist solution to this
problem addressed a world in which
sciences are identified with
printed texts
What if sciences are identified with
information systems ?
28
Problem
Each (clinical, pathological, genetic,
proteomic, pharmacological …) information
system uses its own classification system
How can we overcome the incompatibilities
which become apparent when data from
distinct sources needs to be combined?
29
Solution:
“Ontology”
30
Compare:
1) pure mathematics (theories of structures
such as order, set, function, mapping)
employed in every domain
2) applied mathematics, applications of
these theories = re-using the same
definitions, theorems, proofs in new
application domains
31
Three levels of ontology
1) formal ontology (mereology,
mereotopology, …)
2) domain ontologies
= Foundational Model of Anatomy, Gene
Ontology, Unified Medical Language
System, SNOMED
32
Biomereology must be rich
enough to deal with time and
change
33
Leśniewski’s mereology
grew out of his concerns with the
foundations of mathematics
LIKE SET THEORY, IT DOES NOT TAKE
ACCOUNT OF TIME
34
The Problem
The tumor developed in John’s lung over
25 years
35
The Problem
____ developed in _____ over 25 years
process
36
The Problem
The tumor developed in the lung over 25 years
substances
things
objects
continuants
37
The Problem
The tumor developed in the lung over 25 years
WHAT IS PART OF WHAT
IS NOT DETERMINATE
38
The Problem
The tumor developed in the lung over 25 years
substances
processes
GLUING THESE TOGETHER
MEREOLOGICALLY YIELDS ONTOLOGICAL
MONSTERS
39
Substances and processes
exist in time in different ways
process
substance
40
SNAP vs SPAN
Endurants vs perdurants
Continuants vs occurrents
In preparing an inventory of reality
we keep track of these two different kinds
of entities in two different ways
41
Fourdimensionalism
– only processes exist
– time is just another dimension, analogous
to the three spatial dimensions
– substances are analyzed away as
worms/fibers within the four-dimensional
plenum
42
There are no substances
Bill Clinton does not exist
Rather: there exists within the fourdimensional plenum a continuous
succession of processes which are
similar in a Billclintonizing sort of way
43
Fourdimensionalism solves the
problems of
universal applicability of mereology
indeterminacy of parthood
44
Fourdimensionalism (the SPAN
perspective) is right in
everything it says
But incomplete
45
The response to anyone who
believes that fourdimensionalism is
the whole truth about reality is:
see a doctor
46
The response to anyone who
believes that fourdimensionalism is
the whole truth about reality is:
see any
organism
47
Bio-Ontology requires two
orthogonal applications of
mereology
A fourdimensional ontology
supplemented by a
threedimensional ontology of
continuant entities
48
How can a threedimensional
ontology solve the problem of
determinacy of parthood
PARTHOOD AT AN INSTANT IS
DETERMINATE
take an assay of what exists in the
three spatial dimensions always at
some specific instant of time
49
The 4D and 3D ontologies represent
two complementary views
of the same rich and
messy reality
50
Scales of anatomy
Organism
Organ
10-1 m
Tissue
Cell
10-5 m
Organelle
Protein
DNA
10-9 m
51
A new golden age of classification
central importance of classes / types / kinds
/ universals / species
52
and of is-a hierarchies
53
54
55
cars
Cadillacs
blue cars
blue Cadillacs
56
Confusions about ‘is-a’ and ‘part-of’
in bio-ontologies
Unified Medical Language System
57
The UMLS Semantic
Network
a US Federal Government ontology
designed to unify all biomedical
terminologies
58
what are the nodes in this graph?
59
60
linguistic entities
≈ meanings
61
UMLS SN
is_a =def.
if one item ‘is_a’ another item then
the first item is more specific in
meaning than the second item
62
Fruit
SimilarTo
Vegetable
NarrowerThan
Orange
SynonymWith
Apfelsine
63
Goble & Shadbolt
64
How can concepts/meanings figure
as relata of relations such as
disrupts or contained in?
65
Swimming is healthy and
contains 8 letters
66
UMLS Semantic Network
67
Injury or
Poisoning
Vitamin
68
Experimental
Model of Disease
Bacterium
69
Disease or
Syndrome
Manufactured
Object
70
Mental or
Behavioral
Dysfunction
Biomedical or
Dental Material
71
The Gene Ontology
a ‘controlled vocabulary’
designed to standardize annotation of
genes and gene products
used by over 20 genome database and
many other groups in academia and
industry
and methodology much imitated
72
A part_of B =def A can be part of B
73
The Gene Ontology
menopause part_of death
74
GO: ‘within’
lytic vacuole within a protein storage vacuole
is-a protein storage vacuole
interval within a football match is-a football
match
embryo within a uterus is-a uterus
75
GO: ‘extrinsic to’
extrinsic to membrane part-of membrane
76
these people need our help
formal-ontological help
77
Woodger
The Axiomatic Method in Biology
part_of
is_a_cell
earlier_than
is_a_male_gamete
derives_by_division_or
_fusion_from
is_a_female_gamete
environment_of
is_a_whole_organism
is_an_organized_unity
is_a_genetic_property
78
Material Primitives
part_of
is_a_cell
earlier_than
is_a_male_gamete
derives_by_division_or
_fusion_from
is_a_female_gamete
environment_of
is_a_whole_organism
is_an_organized_unity
is_a_genetic_property
79
Formal Primitives
part_of
is_a_cell
earlier_than
is_a_male_gamete
derives_by_division_or
_fusion_from
is_a_female_gamete
environment_of
is_a_whole_organism
is_an_organized_unity
is_a_genetic_property
80
Formal Primitives
part_of
is_a_cell
earlier_than
is_a_male_gamete
derives_by_division_or
_fusion_from
is_a_female_gamete
environment_of
is_a_whole_organism
is_an_organized_unity
is_a_genetic_property
81
Open Biological Ontologies
Consortium
http://obo.sourceforge.net/
OBO library of controlled vocabularies
developed for shared use across
different biological domains.
Gene Ontology plus: Cell Ontology,
Sequence Ontology, etc.
82
Open Biological Ontologies
Consortium
European Bioinformatics Institute,
Cambridge
Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Maine
Berkeley Genetics,
Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Project
IFOMIS, Saarbrücken
83
OBO Relations Ontology:
is_a
part_of
develops_ from
derives_ from
located_at
participates_in
adjacent_to
contained_in
precedes
has_function
84
Woodger’s Formal Primitives
part_of
is_a_cell
earlier_than
is_a_male_gamete
derives_by_division_or
_fusion_from
is_a_female_gamete
environment_of
is_a_whole_organism
is_an_organized_unity
is_a_genetic_property
85
Foundational Model of Anatomy
Reference Ontology
a graph-theoretical structure involving two
sorts of links or edges:
is-a (= is a subtype of )
(auditory ossicle is-a bone)
part-of
(cervical vertebra part-of vertebral column)
86
Anatomical
Structure
Anatomical Space
Organ Cavity
Subdivision
Organ
Cavity
Organ
Serous Sac
Cavity
Subdivision
Serous Sac
Cavity
Serous Sac
Organ
Component
Organ
Subdivision
Pleural Sac
Pleural
Cavity
Parietal
Pleura
Interlobar
recess
Organ Part
Mediastinal
Pleura
Tissue
Pleura(Wall
of Sac)
Visceral
Pleura
Mesothelium
of Pleura
87
Anatomical
Structure
Organ
Cavity
Serous Sac
Cavity
Organ
Organ Part
Serous Sac
Organ
Component
Pleural Sac
Pleural
Cavity
Organ
Subdivision
Tissue
Pleura(Wall
of Sac)
88
Sac
ty
sion
Serous Sac
Cavity
Serous Sac
Organ
Component
Pleural Sac
Pleural
Cavity
Organ
Subdivision
Tissue
Pleura(Wall
of Sac)
Parietal
Pleura
Visceral
Pleura
Interlobar
recess
Mediastinal
Pleura
Mesothelium
of Pleura
89
The Anatomy Reference Ontology
a coherent theory of part-of as a relation
between classes / types must be based on a
(mereological) theory of part-of as a relation
between instances
Mary’s heart part-of Mary
90
Taking the instance-level part_of
as primitive
we can define:
A part_of B = any instance of A is part_of
some instance of B
nucleus part_of cell
but not:
testis part_of human
91
from A part_of B we cannot infer that B
has_part A
human_testis part_of human
but not
human has_part human testis
running has_part breathing
but not
breathing part_of running
92
Scales of anatomy
Organism
Organ
10-1 m
Tissue
Cell
10-5 m
Organelle
Protein
DNA
10-9 m
93
Institute for Formal Ontology and
Medical Information Science
http://ifomis.org
94
Buffalo Center for Ontological
Research
Two tenure-track faculty positions in
ontology
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bcor
95
The End
96