Hardy-Weinberg
Download
Report
Transcript Hardy-Weinberg
Allele Frequency
The first equation looks at the
percentage of alleles in a population
A+a=1
○ A is the percentage of dominant alleles
○ a is the percentage of recessive alleles
There are 30 million people in Canada,
so how many alleles for eye colour
should there be?
60 million –two for each person
If 38.9 million of those alleles are brown,
what does that mean for the A and a
values?
A = 38.9/60 = 0.649 (64.9%)
a = 21.1/60 = 0.351 (35.1%)
**These are
the allele
frequencies
So our equation A + a = 1 holds true
(0.649 + 0.351 = 1)
% dominant alleles + % recessive alleles
= 100%
Say in New Brunswick (population 750
000), the dominant allele frequency is
71.6%
How many dominant alleles should there
be?
0.716 x 1 500 000 = 1 074 000
Recessive alleles?
A+a=1
a=1–A
= 1 – 0.716
= 0.284 (28.4%)
0.284 x 1 500 000 = 426 000
How does this relate to population
dynamics?
Probability…
If the dominant allele frequency is 64.9%,
then we have a 64.9% chance of selecting
that allele
We would have a (0.649)(0.649) of selecting
it twice -> (0.649)(0.649) = (0.649)2 = 0.421
So, what is A2?
You may recognize it as AA -> homozygous
dominant
This means two things:
1. A random individual in Canada has a 42.1%
chance of being homozygous dominant for
brown eyes
2. 42.1% of individuals in Canada should be
homozygous dominant
This holds true for homozygous recessive
a = 0.351
a2 = (0.351)2
= 0.123
12.3% of individuals should be homozygous
recessive (blue eyes)
What about the carriers (heterozygotes?)
Aa = (0.649)(0.351) = 0.228
But, there are two ways to become
heterozygous -> your father’s allele is
dominant, your mother’s recessive OR you
mother’s is dominant, your father’s
recessive
So, we multiply by 2
2Aa = 2(0.649)(0.351) = 0.456
45.6% are heterozygous
These combine into the equation:
A2 + 2Aa + a2 = 1 (look familiar?)
This means percentage of individuals that
are homozygous dominant plus
heterozygous plus homozygous recessive
equals 100% -> everyone!
Please note that you’ll never use this
equation as a whole ->you will always
merely take out terms from it to do individual
calculations
Does it work backwards?
Yes!
If you know the percentage of people that
are homozygous recessive (usually the
easiest thing to identify), you can make
assumptions about the allele frequency
If 15.4% of people are homozygous
recessive for PTC paper tasting ability, what
percentage are homozygous dominant, and
what percentage are carriers?
a2 = 0.154
a = (0.154)0.5 (this means square root of
0.154, but I couldn’t show that on PPT ’07.
Thanks Microsoft…)
a = 0.392
A+a=1
A=1–a
= 1 – 0.392
= 0.608
With this info, the values are easy to
calculate
A2 = (0.609)2
= 0.370
37.0 % are homozygous dominant
2Aa = 2(0.609)(0.392)
= 0.477
47.7 % are carriers
All percentages add up to 100 (ok, 100.1, sig
figs…)
Example
Batten disease is a rare recessive
neurodegenerative disease, affecting 3 out
of every 100 000 people in North America.
Based on this knowledge, what
percentage of people are carriers and
could pass it onto their offspring?
Answer
We define the dominant, normal allele
as B, and the recessive as b
Since occurrence is 3 out of 100 000,
b2=0.00003
So, frequency of recessive allele is
b=√0.00003 = 0.005
The frequency of the dominant allele is
B = 1-b = 1-0.005 = 0.995
The frequency of carriers would be
2Bb=2(0.995)(0.005) = 0.0095
So, approximately 1% of the population
are carriers for this disease
Example (try on your own)
It is believed that approximately 4% of
Canadians of South American decent are
carriers for the recessive condition sickle
cell anemia. If 98% of the alleles in this
population are dominant, what should the
prevalence of sickle cell anemia be?