Brooker Chapter 5 - Volunteer State Community College
Download
Report
Transcript Brooker Chapter 5 - Volunteer State Community College
PowerPoint Presentation Materials
to accompany
Genetics: Analysis and Principles
Robert J. Brooker
CHAPTER 5
LINKAGE AND
GENETIC MAPPING
IN EUKARYOTES
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5.1 LINKAGE AND
CROSSING OVER
In eukaryotic species, each linear
chromosome contains a long piece of DNA
A typical chromosome contains many hundred
or even a few thousand different genes
The term linkage has two related meanings
1. Two or more genes can be located on the
same chromosome
2. Genes that are close together tend to be
transmitted as a unit
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-3
Chromosomes are called linkage groups
They contain a group of genes that are linked together
The number of linkage groups is the number of
types of chromosomes of the species
For example, in humans
22 autosomal linkage groups
An X chromosome linkage group
A Y chromosome linkage group
Genes that are far apart on the same chromosome
may independently assort from each other
This is due to crossing-over
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-4
Crossing Over May Produce
Recombinant Phenotypes
In diploid eukaryotic species, linkage can be
altered during meiosis as a result of crossing
over
Crossing over
Occurs during prophase I of meiosis at the
bivalent stage
Non-sister chromatids of homologous
chromosomes exchange DNA segments
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-5
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
B
A
B b
A a
B
A
b
a
Diploid cell after
chromosome replication
Diploid cell after
chromosome replication
Fig. 5.1(TE
Art)
Meiosis
B
A
b
a
b
a
Meiosis
B
A
B
A
B
a
b
a
b
a
b
A
Possible haploid cells
(a) Without crossing over, linked alleles
segregate together.
Possible haploid cells
(b) Crossing over can reassort linked
alleles.
These haploid cells contain a
combination of alleles NOT
found in the original
chromosomes
These are
termed
parental or
nonrecombinant
cells
Figure 5.1
This new combination of
alleles is a result of
genetic recombination
These are termed
nonparental or recombinant
cells
5-7
Bateson and Punnett Discovered Two
Traits That Did Not Assort Independently
In 1905, William Bateson and Reginald Punnett
conducted a cross in sweet pea involving two
different traits
Flower color and pollen shape
This is a dihybrid cross that is expected to yield a
9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio in the F2 generation
However, Bateson and Punnett obtained surprising
results
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-8
Figure 5.2
A much greater proportion
of the two types found in
the parental generation
5-9
Morgan Provided Evidence for the
Linkage of Several X-linked Genes
The first direct evidence of linkage came from
studies of Thomas Hunt Morgan
Morgan investigated several traits that followed an
X-linked pattern of inheritance
Figure 5.3 illustrates an experiment involving three
traits
Body color
Eye color
Wing length
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-11
x
y+ w+ m+ Y
yy ww mm
F1 generation contains wild-type
females and yellow-bodied,
white-eyed, miniature-winged
males.
F1 generation
x
y+y w+w m+m
ywmY
P Males
P Females
Morgan observed a much higher proportion of the
combinations of traits found in the parental generation
Morgan’s explanation:
All three genes are located on the X chromosome
Therefore, they tend to be transmitted together as a unit
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-13
Morgan Provided Evidence for the
Linkage of Several X-linked Genes
1. Why did the F2 generation have a
significant number of nonparental
combinations?
2. Why was there a quantitative difference
between the various nonparental
combinations?
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-14
Let’s reorganize Morgan’s data by considering the pairs of
genes separately
Gray body, red eyes
1,159
Yellow body, white eyes
1,017
Gray body, white eyes
Yellow body, red eyes
Total
17
12
2,205
Red eyes, normal wings
770
White eyes, miniature wings
716
Red eyes, miniature wings
White eyes, normal wings
Total
401
318
2,205
But this nonparental
combination was rare
It was fairly common
to get this nonparental
combination
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-15
Morgan made three important hypotheses to
explain his results
1. The genes for body color, eye color and wing
length are all located on the X-chromosome
2. Due to crossing over, the homologous X
chromosomes (in the female) can exchange
pieces of chromosomes
They tend to be inherited together
This created new combination of alleles
3. The likelihood of crossing over depends on
the distance between the two genes
Crossing over is more likely to occur between two
genes that are far apart from each other
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-17
Figure 5-5
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Figure 5.4
These parental phenotypes are
the most common offspring
These recombinant offspring
are not uncommon
because the genes are far apart
5-18
Figure 5.4
These recombinant offspring
are fairly uncommon
because the genes are very close together
These recombinant offspring
are very unlikely
1 out of 2,205
5-19
Chi Square Analysis
This method is frequently used to determine
if the outcome of a dihybrid cross is
consistent with linkage or independent
assortment
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-20
Creighton and McClintock Experiment
C
wx
Normal
chromosome 9
Parental
chromosomes
c
Abnormal
chromosome 9
Knob
Interchanged
piece from
chromosome 8
(a) Normal and abnormal chromosome 9
C = Colored
c = colorless
Wx = Starchy endosperm
wx = waxy endosperm
Wx
Crossing over
c
wx
Nonparental
chromosomes
C
Wx
(b) Crossing over between normal and
abnormal chromosome 9
Figure 5.6
5-30
Interpreting the Data
Parent A
Parent B
C wx (nonrecombinant)
c Wx (nonrecombinant)
C Wx (recombinant)
c wx (recombinant)
c Wx
c wx
By combining these gametes into a Punnett square, the
following types of offspring can be produced
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-32
Ambiguous phenotypes that
could be produced whether
or not recombination
occurred in parent A
So let’s start by
considering the
unambiguous
phenotypes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-33
The colored, waxy phenotype (Cc wxwx) can occur
only if
Recombination did not occur in parent A
AND
Parent A passed the knobbed, translocated chromosome
to its offspring
This was the case, as shown in the data table
below
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-34
The colorless, waxy phenotype (cc wxwx) can
occur only if
Recombination did occur in parent A
AND
Parent A passed a chromosome 9 that had a
translocation but was knobless
This was the case, as shown in the data table
below
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-35
The Data
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-31
These observations were consistent with the
idea that a cross over occurred between the
C and wx genes
As stated by Creighton and McClintock:
“Pairing chromosomes, heteromorphic in two
regions, have been shown to exchange parts at
the same time they exchange genes assigned to
these regions.”
5-36
5.2 GENETIC MAPPING IN
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Genetic mapping is also known as gene mapping
or chromosome mapping
Its purpose is to determine the linear order of
linked genes along the same chromosome
Figure 5.8 illustrates a simplified genetic linkage
map of Drosophila melanogaster
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-42
Each gene has its
own unique locus
at a particular site
within a
chromosome
Figure 5.8
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-43
Experimentally, the percentage of recombinant
offspring is correlated with the distance between the
two genes
If the genes are far apart many recombinant offspring
If the genes are close very few recombinant offspring
Map distance = Number of recombinant offspring X 100
Total number of offspring
The units of distance are called map units (mu)
They are also referred to as centiMorgans (cM)
One map unit is equivalent to 1% recombination frequency
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-45
Chromosomes are
the product of a
crossover during
meiosis in the
heterozygous parent
Recombinant
offspring are fewer
in number than
nonrecombinant
offspring
Figure 5.9
5-47
The data at the bottom of Figure 5.9 can be used to
estimate the distance between the two genes
Number of recombinant offspring X 100
Map distance =
Total number of offspring
=
76 + 75
542 + 537 + 76 + 75
X 100
= 12.3 map units
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-48
Alfred Sturtevant’s Experiment
The first genetic map was constructed in 1911 by
Alfred Sturtevant
He was an undergraduate who spent time in the
laboratory of Thomas Hunt Morgan
Sturtevant wrote:
“In conversation with Morgan … I suddenly realized that
the variations in the length of linkage, already attributed
by Morgan to differences in the spatial orientation of the
genes, offered the possibility of determining sequences
[of different genes] in the linear dimension of the
chromosome. I went home and spent most of the night
(to the neglect of my undergraduate homework) in
producing the first chromosome map, which included the
sex-linked genes, y, w, v, m, and r, in the order and
approximately the relative spacing that they still appear
on the standard maps.”
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-49
Figure 5.10
5-52
The Data
Alleles
Concerned
Number Recombinant/ Percent Recombinant
Total Number
Offspring
y and w/w-e
214/21,736
1.0
y and v
1,464/4,551
32.2
y and r
115/324
35.5
y and m
260/693
37.5
w/w-e and v
471/1,584
29.7
w/w-e and r
2,062/6,116
33.7
w/w-e and m
406/898
45.2
v and r
17/573
3.0
v and m
109/405
26.9
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-53
Interpreting the Data
In some dihybrid crosses, the percentage of
nonparental (recombinant) offspring was rather low
For example, there’s only 1% recombinant offspring in
the crosses involving the y and w or w-e alleles
This suggests that these two genes are very close
together
Other dihybrid crosses showed a higher
percentage of nonparental offspring
For example, crosses between the v and m alleles
produced 26.9% recombinant offspring
This suggests that these two genes are farther apart
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-54
Sturtevant assumed that the map distances would
be more accurate among genes that are closely
linked
Therefore, his map is based on the following distances
y – w (1.0), w – v (29.7), v – r (3.0) and v – m (26.9)
Sturtevant also considered map distances amongst
gene pairs to deduce the order of genes
Percentage of crossovers between w and r was 33.7
Percentage of crossovers between w and v was 29.7
Percentage of crossovers between v and r was 3.0
Therefore, the gene order is w – v – r
Where v is closer to r than it is to w
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-55
Sturtevant collectively considered all these data
and proposed the following genetic map
Sturtevant began at the y gene and mapped the
genes from left to right
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-56
A close look at Sturtevant’s data reveals two points
that do not agree very well with his genetic map
The y and m dihybrid cross yielded 37.5% recombinants
But the map distance is 57.6
The w and m dihybrid cross yielded 45.2% recombinants
But the map distance is 56.6
So what’s up?
As the percentage of recombinant offspring approaches a
value of 50 %
This value becomes a progressively more inaccurate
measure of map distance
Refer to Figure 5.11
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-57
Figure 5.11
When the distance between two genes is large
The likelihood of multiple crossovers increases
This causes the observed number of recombinant offspring
to underestimate the distance between the two genes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-58
Figure 5-12a
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Trihybrid Crosses
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-59
Trihybrid Crosses
Data from trihybrid crosses can also yield information
about map distance and gene order
The following experiment outlines a common strategy for
using trihybrid crosses to map genes
In this example, we will consider fruit flies that differ in
body color, eye color and wing shape
b = black body color
b+ = gray body color
pr = purple eye color
pr+ = red eye color
vg = vestigial wings
vg+ = normal wings
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-59
Step 1: Cross two true-breeding strains that differ
with regard to three alleles.
Female is mutant
for all three traits
Male is homozygous
wildtype for all three
traits
The goal in this step is to obtain aF1 individuals that
are heterozygous for all three genes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-60
Step 2: Perform a testcross by mating F1 female
heterozygotes to male flies that are homozygous
recessive for all three alleles
During gametogenesis in the heterozygous female F1 flies,
crossovers may produce new combinations of the 3 alleles
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-61
Step 3: Collect data for the F2 generation
Number of Observed Offspring
(males and females)
Phenotype
Gray body, red eyes, normal wings
411
Gray body, red eyes, vestigial wings
61
Gray body, purple eyes, normal wings
2
Gray body, purple eyes, vestigial wings
30
Black body, red eyes, normal wings
28
Black body, red eyes, vestigial wings
1
Black body, purple eyes, normal wings
60
Black body, purple eyes, vestigial wings
412
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-62
The three genes exist as two alleles each
Therefore, there are 23 = 8 possible combinations of
F2 offspring
If the genes assorted independently, all eight
combinations would occur in equal proportions
It is obvious that they are far from equal
In the offspring of crosses involving linked genes,
Parental phenotypes occur most frequently
Double crossover phenotypes occur least frequently
Single crossover phenotypes occur with “intermediate”
frequency
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-63
The combination of traits in the double crossover tells us
which gene is in the middle
A double crossover separates the gene in the middle from
the other two genes at either end
In the double crossover categories, the recessive purple
eye color is separated from the other two recessive alleles
Thus, the gene for eye color lies between the genes for
body color and wing shape
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-64
Step 4: Calculate the map distance between pairs of
genes
To do this, one strategy is to regroup the data
according to pairs of genes
From the parental generation, we know that the
dominant alleles are linked, as are the recessive alleles
This allows us to group pairs of genes into parental and
nonparental combinations
Parentals have a pair of dominant or a pair of recessive alleles
Nonparentals have one dominant and one recessive allele
The regrouped data will allow us to calculate the map
distance between the two genes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-65
Parental offspring
Gray body, red eyes
(411 + 61)
Black body, purple eyes
(412 + 60)
Total
Nonparental Offspring
Total
472
Gray body, purple eyes
(30 + 2)
32
472
Black body, red eyes
(28 + 1)
29
944
61
The map distance between body color and eye color is
61
X 100 = 6.1 map units
Map distance =
944 + 61
5-66
Parental offspring
Gray body, normal wings
(411 + 2)
Black body, vestigial wings
(412 + 1)
Total
Nonparental Offspring
Total
413
Gray body, vestigial wings
(30 + 61)
91
413
Black body, normal wings
(28 + 60)
88
826
179
The map distance between body color and wing shape is
179
X 100 = 17.8 map units
Map distance =
826 + 179
5-67
Parental offspring
Red eyes, normal wings
(411 + 28)
Purple eyes, vestigial wings
(412 + 30)
Total
Nonparental Offspring
Total
439
Red eyes, vestigial wings
(61 + 1)
62
442
Purple eyes, normal wings
(60 + 2)
62
881
124
The map distance between eye color and wing shape is
124
X 100 = 12.3 map units
Map distance =
881 + 124
5-68
Step 5: Construct the map
Based on the map unit calculation the body color and
wing shape genes are farthest apart
The eye color gene is in the middle
The data is also consistent with the map being drawn
as vg – pr – b (from left to right)
In detailed genetic maps, the locations of genes are
mapped relative to the centromere
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-69
To calculate map distance, we have gone
through a method that involved the separation of
data into pairs of genes (see step 4)
An alternative method does not require this
manipulation
Rather, the trihybrid data is used directly
This method is described next
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-70
Phenotype
Number of
Observed
Offspring
Gray body,
purple eyes,
vestigial wings
30
Black body,
red eyes,
normal wings
28
Gray body,
red eyes,
vestigial wings
61
Black body,
purple eyes,
normal wings
60
Gray body,
purple eyes,
normal wings
2
Black body,
red eyes,
vestigial wings
1
Single crossover
between b and pr
30 + 28
= 0.058
1,005
Single crossover
between pr and vg
61 + 60
Double crossover,
between b and pr,
and between
pr and vg
1+2
= 0.120
1,005
= 0.003
1,005
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-71
To determine the map distance between the genes, we
need to consider both single and double crossovers
To calculate the distance between b and pr
Map distance = (0.058 + 0.003) X 100 = 6.1 mu
To calculate the distance between pr and vg
Map distance = (0.120 + 0.003) X 100 = 12.3 mu
To calculate the distance between b and vg
The double crossover frequency needs to be multiplied by two
Because both crossovers are occurring between b and vg
Map distance = (0.058 + 0.120 + 2[0.003]) X 100
= 18.4 mu
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-72
Alternatively, the distance between b and vg can be
obtained by simply adding the map distances between
b and pr, and between pr and vg
Map distance = 6.1 + 12.3 = 18.4 mu
Note that in the first method (grouping in pairs), the
distance between b and vg was found to be 17.8 mu.
This slightly lower value was a small underestimate
because the first method does not consider the double
crossovers in the calculation
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-73
Figure 5-8
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Figure 5-10
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Figure 5-11
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Interference
The product rule allows us to predict the likelihood of a
double crossover from the individual probabilities of each
single crossover
P (double crossover) = P (single crossover X P (single crossover
between b and pr)
between pr and vg)
= 0.061 X 0.123 = 0.0075
Based on a total of 1,005 offspring
The expected number of double crossover offspring is
= 1,005 X 0.0075 = 7.5
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-74
Interference
Therefore, we would expect seven or eight offspring to be
produced as a result of a double crossover
However, the observed number was only three!
Two with gray bodies, purple eyes, and normal sings
One with black body, red eyes, and vestigial wings
This lower-than-expected value is due to a common genetic
phenomenon, termed positive interference
The first crossover decreases the probability that a
second crossover will occur nearby
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-75
Interference (I) is expressed as
I = 1 – C
where C is the coefficient of coincidence
Observed number of double crossovers
C=
Expected number of double crossovers
C=
3
7.5
= 0.40
I = 1 – C = 1 – 0.4
= 0.6 or 60%
This means that 60% of the expected number of
crossovers did not occur
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-76
Since I is positive, this interference is positive interference
Rarely, the outcome of a testcross yields a negative value
for interference
This suggests that a first crossover enhances the rate of
a second crossover
The molecular mechanisms that cause interference are not
completely understood
However, most organisms regulate the number of
crossovers so that very few occur per chromosome
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-77
5.3 GENETIC MAPPING IN
HAPLOID EUKARYOTES
Much of our earliest understanding of genetic
recombination came from the genetic analyses of fungi
Fungi may be unicellular or multicellular organisms
They are typically haploid (1n)
They reproduce asexually and, in many cases, sexually
The sac fungi (ascomycetes) have been particularly useful
to geneticists because of their unique style of sexual
reproduction
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-78
Meiosis produces
four haploid cells,
termed spores
These are
enclosed in a sac
termed an ascus
Figure 5.12
5-79
The cells of a tetrad or octad are contained within
a sac
In other words, the products of a single meiotic
division are contained within one sac
This is a key feature that dramatically differs from
sexual reproduction in animals and plants
In animals, for example
Oogenesis only produces a single functional egg
Spermatogenesis produces sperm that are mixed
with millions of other sperm
Using a microscope, researchers can dissect asci
and study the traits of each haploid spore
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-80
Types of Tetrads or Octads
The arrangement of spores within an ascus
varies from species to species
Unordered tetrads or octads
Ascus provides enough space for the spores to
randomly mix together
Ordered tetrads or octads
Ascus is very tight, thereby preventing spores from
randomly moving around
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-81
Ascus provides
space for spores to
randomly mix
together
Tight ascus
prevents mixing
of spores
Mold
Yeast
Figure 5.13
Unicellular alga
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-82
Ordered Tetrad Analysis
Ordered tetrads or octads have the following key
feature
The position and order of spores within the ascus is
determined by the divisions of meiosis and mitosis
This idea is schematically shown in Figure 5.13b
The example depicts ordered octad formation in
Neurospora crassa
Spores that carry the A allele show orange pigmentation
Spores that carry the a (albino) allele are white
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-83
Pairs of daughter
cells are located
next to each other
Figure 5.13
All eight cells are
arranged in a linear,
ordered fashion
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-84
020
The genetic content of spores in ordered
tetrads can be determined
This allows experimenters to map the distance
between a single gene and the centromere
The logic of this mapping technique is based
on the following features of meiosis
Centromeres of homologous chromosomes
separate during meiosis I
Centromeres of sister chromatids separate
during meiosis II
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-85
This 4:4 arrangement of spores within
the ascus is termed a first-division
segregation (FDS) or an M1 pattern
Octad contains a linear arrangement of
4 haploid cells with the A allele which
are adjacent to 4 with the a allele
Because the A and a alleles have
segregated from each other after
meiosis I
Figure 5.14 (a) No crossing over
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-86
These arrangement of
The A and a alleles do not
spores are termed a
second-division segregation segregate until meiosis II
(SDS) or M2 patterns
Figure 5.14 (b) Single crossing over
5-87
The percentage of M2 asci can be used to calculate
the map distance between the centromere and the
gene of interest
Figure 5.15
5-88
Therefore the chances of getting a 2:2:2:2 or 2:4:2 pattern
depend on the distance between the gene of interest and the
centromere
To calculate this distance, the experimenter must count the
number of SDS asci, as well as the total number of asci
In SDS asci, only half of the spores are actually the
product of a crossover
Therefore
(1/2) (Number of SDS asci) X 100
Map distance =
Total number of asci
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-89
Unordered Tetrad Analysis
Unicellular algae
Figure 5-18
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Unordered Tetrad Analysis
Unordered tetrads contain randomly arranged
groups of spores
An experimenter can do a dihybrid cross and then
determine the phenotypes of the spores
Such an analysis can determine if two genes are
linked or assort independently
It can also be used to compute distance
between two linked genes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-90
Unordered Tetrad Analysis
Consider a diploid yeast zygote with the genotype
ura+ura-2 arg+arg-3
ura+ and arg+ = Normal alleles required for uracil and
arginine biosynthesis, respectively
ura-2 and arg-3 = Defective alleles
Result in strains that require uracil and arginine in
their growth medium
Figure 5.16 illustrates the assortment of the two
genes in the unordered tetrad
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-91
Figure 5.16
PD ascus: contains
100% parental cells
T ascus: contains
50% parental cells and
50% recombinant cells
NPD ascus: contains
100% recombinant cells
5-92
If the two genes assort independently
The number of asci with a parental ditype is expected to
equal the number with a nonparental ditype
Thus, 50% recombinant spores are produced
If the two genes are linked
The type of crossover between them determines what
type of ascus is produced
No crossovers yield the parental ditype
Single crossovers produce the tetratype
Double crossovers can yield any of the three types
The actual type produced depends on the combination of
chromatids that are involved
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-93
Figure 5.17
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-94
Figure 5.17
5-95
As in conventional mapping, the map distance is calculated
as the % of offspring that carry recombinant chromosomes
NPD + (1/2) (T)
Map distance =
X 100
Total number of asci
This calculation is fairly reliable over a short distance
However, over long distances it is not
Because it does not adequately account for double crossovers
A more precise way to calculate map distance
Single crossover tetrads +
(2) (Double crossover tetrads)
Map distance =
Total number of asci
X 0.5 X 100
Crossover tetrads also contain 50%
nonrecombinant chromosomes
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-96
For the equation to be useful, it needs to be related to the
number of various types obtained by experimentation
So let’s take another look at Figure 5.17
The parental ditype (PD) and tetratype (T) are ambiguous
They can each be derived in two different ways
The nonparental ditype (NPD), however, is unambiguous
It can only be produced from a double crossover (DCO)
1/4 of all the double crossovers are nonparental ditypes
Therefore, DCO = 4 X NPD
But what about single crossovers (SCO)?
Notice that T asci can result from SCO or DCO
Since there are two kinds of T that are due to DCO
The actual number of T arising from DCO is 2NPD
So, T = SCO + 2NPD
Therefore, SCO = T – 2NPD
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-97
Now we have accurate measures of both SCO and DCO
SCO = T – 2NPD and DCO = 4NPD
So, let’s substitute these values into our previous equation
Single crossover tetrads +
(2) (Double crossover tetrads)
Map distance =
Map distance =
X 0.5 X 100
Total number of asci
(T – 2NPD) + (2) (4NPD)
Total number of asci
T + 6NPD
Map distance =
Total number of asci
X 0.5 X 100
X 0.5 X 100
A more accurate measure of map distance because the
equation considers both single- and double-crossovers
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5-98