Transcript ppt - University of Toledo

OCCBIO 2007
Panel Discussion
Accelerating Progress in
Bioinformatics: Education, Technology,
Infrastructure, and Application
Hardware Acceleratos for
Bioinformatics
Anthony D. Johnson
The University of Toledo
? Hardware Acceleration Processors ?

Accelerating Bioinformatics beyond microprocessors,

Inherent limitations of microprocessors,

already at the upper limit on clock speed,

limited degree of parallelism in hardware,

fixed hardware architecture not adapted to:



FASTA,
BLAST.
Acceleration Processors already developed using:

high parallelism in hardware,

mature technologies.
Computational tasks in Bioinformatics


At the top abstraction level, most Bioinformatics tasks can be
described as partial matching of character strings, or string
patterns,
Bioinformatics research tasks characterized by:

large data sets,

minimal dependency between data elements,

huge numbers of simple processing steps.
Multiple platform computing systems



offer hardware parallelism in the form of:
 computer clusters,
 multi-core processors;
slow data transfer between:
 processors and shared memory,
 processors and distributed memory;
powering supercomputers is costly (up to 50MW).
Field Programmable Gate Arrays







Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) electronic components,
manufactured using cutting edge VLSI technologies,
architectures completely application-independent,
configurable functionality:

after the manufacturing of the FPGA has been completed,

on the lowest functional module level,

"on the fly" - while running an application,
vast configurable interconnect resources,
massive hardware parallelism,
power consumption significantly below microprocessors.
FPGA Architectures

Arrays of identical configurable Logic Circuit Modules (LCMs)

vendors refer to propriotary LCMs by different names:


Logic Module (Actel),

Logic Array Block (Altera),

Configurable Logic Block (Xilinx);
Architectures loosely classified by the size of LCMs:

fine-grain,

coarse-grain,

mixed-grain.
Virtex-2 LCM

Includes:

four slices,

one switch matrix.
Virtex-2 Half-Slice arcitecture
Virtex-2 slice Configurations

Look Up Table,

Shift Register,

Memory.
FPGA Architectures - continued

modern FPGAs feature a variety of specialized modules:

adder circuitry,

multiplier arrays,

memory blocks,

whole microprocessors,

blocks of fast I/O ports,

Digital Delay Loops for clock skew and frequency
management.
Virtex-2 Memory and Multipliers

Close coupling between:



memory
and
multiplier blocks.
FPGA Characteristics

variable number of LCMs - 4k to 200k,

variable number of I/O connection pads (in excess of 1400),

speed grade,

package type.
Other Candidates for Acceleration Processors





General Purpose Graphics Processing Units
(GPGPUs)
stream processors (stream = set of records which require
similar computation)
GPUs enhanced for supporting some other FP applications,
extreme parallelism of the GPU pipeline makes them
suitable for applications with:
 large data sets,
 high parallelism,
 minimal dependency between data elements,
may lack reliability needed in scientific HPC.
Other Candidates for Acceleration Processors




Cell Processor by IBM, Toshiba & Sony
designed for PlayStation’s enhanced graphics processing,
contains one scalar and eight vector processors.
Vector processors:
 pipeline both, the instruction execution and the data
I/O,

have a degree of superscalar implementation, i.e.
parallelism in hardware.
Other candidates for Acceleration Processors
Array Processor by ClearSpeed

Multithreaded Array Processor for floating point operations:
 64 processing elements in an 8x8 array,
 FP unit,
 local memory, 384KB SRAM,


I/O ports;
programmable only in C language.
High Level programming Languages

Every researcher is fluent in one HLL,

one HLL is included in all Bachelor Degree curricula,

HLLs’ characteristics:
 semantics and syntax are oriented to the application
for which originally developed,

hundreds have been developed with some goal in
mind - small percentage is still in use.
HLLs - continued

algorithms described by consecutive operations,

require translation to a lower level language,

translation is platform/compiler dependent,

source code is nominally portable.
Hardware Description Languages (HDLs)

Only few engineering students learn an HDL,

HDLs’ characteristics:

designed to describe hardware,

intended originally for hardware simulation,

describe algorithms by concurrent operations on
electrical signals.
HDLs - continued

there are two standardized HDLs :


VHDL developed under a grant from DOD,

VHDL = VHSIC HDL,

VHSIC= Very High Speed Integrated Circuits,
Verilog is a product of a single company.
Configuring the FPGAs
After an HDL code has been extensively simulated:
1. synthesis tool converts the code into a net-list form,

due to the original purpose, NOT all HDL constructs
are synthesizable!
2. vendor tools map the net list onto the FPGA's hardware,
3. designer specifies mapping constraints to meat the timing
requirements,
4. extensive verification after each step in the process.
Hybrid HLL/HDL Languages

Incorporate the hardware component into an HLL,

tend to bear resemblance to the C-language,

their name predominantly contains the character C ,


aim to imply that power of acceleration processors is at finger tips
of researchers,
re-education still needed to transition from sequential to parallel
programming.
Hybrid HLL/HDL - continued



development of libraries of common functions crucial for
adoption,
some vendors provide tools for conversion form fortran and
C to Hybrid-C;
After the Hybrid-C code has been obtained:
 all steps listed for HDLs are necessary,


vendors are working on automating the steps,
automation implies artificial intelligence solutions.
A sample of Hybrids and tools for converting C code
to HDL
C2H
C
ChiMPS
Catapult-

Handel-C
HARWEST
Carte

Mitrion-C
SystemC
Chapel

ROCCC

Impulse-C
DIME-C
Computing platforms with FPGA acceleration
processors


General trend: patforms with hybrid processing resources.
Means for connecting FPGAs to microprocessors:
 main processor bus,
 memory slot,
 I/O slot,
 HTX expansion bus slot.
One Shared Architecture

Two Opteron processor sockets on a board,

sockets linked by a high-speed, HyperTransport (HTX) bus,

one socket contains an Opteron – for control tasks,

the other holds an FPGA card – for intensive data-processing,

examples:
 XtremeData’s XD1000 FPGA Coprocessor Module,

DRC’s Reconfigurable Processing Unit, RPU110-L200.
Other Interesting Architectures

Systems using two processors and one HTX slot:
 IBM x3455,


HP DL145 Server.
Other architectures:
 Cray XD1 cluster supercomputer with proprietary
extension modules,


first couple: Opteron - FPGA - for processing,

second couple: Opteron - FPGA - for communication;
Celoxica’s RCHTX high-performance computing board
plugs into an HTX slot,

SRC Computers plug MAP processor into a memory slot.
Other significant platforms

Mitrion Virtual Processor:
 runs on Virtex-4 FPGAs on the SGI RASC RC100 compute
blades,




runs commercially available BLAST application;
SGI Altix family servers are equipped with
 SGI RASC RC100 computation blades,
Nallatech System uses:
 BenONE FPGA-based computing card on H100 Series
platform,
Cray XT Super Computers:
 will replace the XD1 line,

will use a DRC’s extension module with Virtex-4 FPGAs.
Benchmarks of Bioinformatics Algorithms

FASTA running on the Cray XD1 System,

benchmarking results show unprecedented FPGA speedups [2].

Demonstrating substantial benefits to the users generates the
traction for a breakthrough into mainstream HPC markets.
Micro-RNA Comparison benchmark




query sequences:
databasefile:
chromosomes
Platform 1:
Speedup vs. Opteron
3685 sequences (~20 characters )
the first of all 24 human genome
Cray XD1, using one Virtex2 Pro 50 FPGA
10X
Bacillus_anthracis DNA Comparison

query sequences:

database file:
AE017024 through AE017041,
(300K characters per sequence)
AE016879 (more than 5M characters)
Platform 1:
speedup vs. Opteron:
Cray XD1, using one Virtex2 Pro 50 FPGA
50X
Platform 2:
speedup vs. Opteron:
Cray XD1, using one Virtex4 LX160 FPGA
100X (from 8 hours down to 5 minutes)

Platform 3:
speedup vs. Opteron:
Cray XD1, using five Virtex4 LX160 FPGAs
500X [3]

Speedup scales linearly with the number of FPGAs !!!





Amino Acid Search

query sequences

database file:



Platform 1:
Speedup vs. Opteron:
OpenFPGA : ras (60 characters)
myc (189 characters)
sec (351 characters)
24 human genome chromosomes translated
into amino acids
Cray XD1, using one Virtex-II Pro 50
20X to 50X
Speedup increases with the sequence length.
Other Benchmark Outcomes

After the 100X and 500X speedups by FPGA-acceleration
processors on XD1:

all other reported speedups are less significant,

few researchers are likely to settle for 10X to 20X,

all vendors will scramble to catch up with Cray,

Bioinformatics should hope for a much better HPC
landscape in the near future.
Recent References

[1] Tripp, J.L., Gokhale, M.B, Peterson, K.D.: Trident: From HighLevel Language to Hardware Circuitry, IEEE Computer, March
2007,pp.28-37.

[2] Storaasli, O., YU, W., Strenski, D., Multbi, J.,: Evaluation of
FPGA-Based Biological Applications, CUG 2007.

[3] Storaasli, O., ORNL’s Future Technologies Group - personal
communication.

[4] Lazou,C.:
FPGAs
PrimeurMonthly, 2007.
in
HPC
Landscape,
EnterTheGrid
-
Acknowledgment: Results courtesy of:
On research supported by the LDRD Program of ORNL for the U.S.
Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725
Computer Architectures

Jargons are living, changing, confusing:

Von Neumann architecture is defined by basic
hardware subsystems and their interaction,
Computer Architectures 

continued
in the current jargon, architecture is defined by the
instruction set of the processor,
 x86 = IA-32: Pentium, Athlon,
 IA-64: Itanium, 2001,
 PowerPC: PPC620, IBM,
 SPARC, SUN,
 PA-RISC: PA8700, HewletPackard;
microarchitecture determines how processor executes
instructions.
Microprocessor Architectures: Pipelines



Still basic Von Neumann architecture,
architectures of subsystems have undergone extensive development,
first to achieve one instruction per clock cycle, exploiting ILP,
Pipe-lining:
executes in parallel different parts of multiple instructions on different parts
of the pipe-lined processor's hardware,
Microprocessor Architectures: Threading



Execution of multiple instructions per clock cycle, exploiting independent
code sequence level parallelism by:
 threading, which uses multiple pipe-lines to execute multiple
instruction sequences concurrently .
both, pipelining and threading are not always clear winners,
pipelining speedup is eroded by hazards which stall execution of an
instruction:
 structural hazards consequence of lack of hardware parallelism,
 data hazards consequence of instruction dependencies,
 control hazards consequence of branches which change the
PC.
Microprocessor Architectures - Summary
In the end:

fixed architectures,

compromise between demands of different applications,

programming using HLLs,

compilers adapt processing to the instruction set,

speed is limited, and paid for, by power dissipation.

powering supercomputers takes up to 50MW.