Transcript Dia 1

Ranges and Changes of pH
in Zoological Alcohol
Collections
Marion Kotrba
Daniel Burckhardt
Klaus Golbig
Christoph Meier
&
Ranges and Changes of pH in
Zoological Alcohol Collections
10
pH
9
8
7
6
5
Pisces
4
0
AmphibiaReptilia
50
Mammalia
Mollusca
100
Crustacea
Psyllidae
150
Formicidae
Diptera
200
Comparison of pH values in museum collections of Basel (black) and Munich (white). Values arranged in
rising order within taxa; 30 samples per taxon and collection i. e. 480 in total; assessed with pH electrode.
13% of samples in acidic range below pH 6 and 13% in alkaline range
above pH 8. Similarities between compared collections regard e. g. the
very large overall range in Formicidae and Diptera and the comparatively
alkaline conditions in Crustacea. Note the small range in Basel Psyllidae
(recently curated).
2
&
Ranges and Changes of pH in
Zoological Alcohol Collections
480 specimen jars were visually classified a priori
as in need for curation (series B) or not (series A)
based on evaporation, colour, opacity etc. of the
preservation fluid. pH values were subsequently
measured with a pH electrode.
60
n
50
40
visually classified as
needing curation
30
visually classified as
probably OK
Visual assessment largely fails to
recognize problematic jars.
20
10
0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
pH
10
Standard topping up procedure
hardly improves the pH.
60
n
Statement of problem:
50
40
after curation
before curation
30
20
10
0
3
3
After the first pH assessment 320 jars a priori
classified as needing curation (series B) were topped
up with alcohol. Then the pH values were measured
again.
4
5
6
7
8
9
pH
10
Measurement and interpretation of
pH in alcohol collections is time
consuming and problematic.
Reconstitution of desired pH is
likewise problematic (usually
requiring complete exchange of
preservation fluid).
&
Ranges and Changes of pH in
Zoological Alcohol Collections
Suggested approach Part I:
Stabilize pH by buffering preservation fluid with solid ion-exchange
material such as
a substrate-bound ampholyte
i. e. a polymeric substrate (e.g. polystyrene or
cellulose) provided with positively and negatively
charged groups (e.g. carboxyl grous, sulfuric acid
or phosphoric acid groups, various amino gorups).
or a combination of acidic and alkaline
ion-exchange substrates in separate
dispensers
exchange exhausted ampholyte
only if deviating pH is detected
4
exchange only the
exhausted bout if
deviating pH is detected
Ranges and Changes of pH in Zoological
Alcohol Collections of Basel and Munich
Suggested approach Part II:
Combine ion-exchange material with color pH indicator for easy pH
assessment using
a substrate-bound ampholyte
5
or a combination of acidic and alkaline
ion-exchange substrates in separate
dispensers
&
Ranges and Changes of pH in Zoological
Alcohol Collections of Basel and Munich
&
Suggested approach Part III:
Advantages:
pH stabilized right from the start reducing risks for specimens and
curatorial efforts
buffering agent and its reaction products not interacting directly with
stored specimens, e.g. by forming insoluble deposits on their surface
detected pH deviations easily amended by exchanging exhausted
buffering agent instead of exchanging preservation fluid, i. e. without
disturbing specimens or furthering additional leaching of lipids etc.
solid ion-exchange material may be regenerated after exhaustion
recognition of problematic jars substantially facilitated by combining
the ion-exchange material with pH indicator
Reference:
Kotrba, M. and Golbig, K.: A new approach to stabilize the pH in fluid-preserved natural history
collections. Submitted to Collection Forum.
6