Clinical Risk Management
Download
Report
Transcript Clinical Risk Management
International Perspectives
Feedback from the review board
Charles Vincent
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Adverse event studies
3-16%
adverse event rate in US and
Australia
10.0
% cases with adverse events in UK
10.7
% adverse event rate
30%
events lead to moderate or greater
impairment to patient
Half of adverse events cases preventable
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
To err is human: The Institute of
Medicine Report
Establish
a national focus to create
leadership, research tools and protocols
Identifying and learning from errors
through mandatory & voluntary reporting
Raising standards and expectations for the
improvement of safety
Creating safety systems inside healthcare
organisations through implementation of
safe practices at delivery level
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Recommendations from the IOM
Report
Creation
of a Centre for Patient Safety
– Set national goals
– Develop knowledge and understanding
Identifying
and learning from errors
– Nation-wide mandatory reporting system
– Encouraging voluntary reporting systems
– Legislation to protect safety data
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Recommendations from the IOM
Report
Performance
standards and expectations
– Focus greater attention on patient safety for
» health organisations
» health professionals
– Drug packaging and drug names
Implementing
safety systems
– Establishing patient safety programmes
– Implementing proven medication safety
practices
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
An Organisation with Memory
Recommendations
Introduce
a national mandatory reporting
scheme for serious adverse events
Encourage a reporting and questioning
culture
Introduce a single overall system for
analysing and disseminating lessons
Make better use of existing sources of
information
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
An Organisation with Memory
Recommendations
Improve
the quality and relevance of
adverse event investigations and inquiries
Undertake a programme of basic research
Make full use of NHS information systems
Act of ensure lessons learned quickly
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
An Organisation with Memory
Recommendations
Identify
and address specific categories of
serious recurring adverse events
– Reduce deaths from maladministered spinal
injections to zero
– Reduce negligent harm in obstetrics by 25%
– Reduce by 40% serious errors in use of
prescribed drugs
– Reduce suicide by hanging in mental health
patients to zero
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
An Organisation with Memory
Learning from adverse events in the British NHS
PAST
Fear of reprisals
common
Individuals
scapegoated
Individual training
dominant
Attention focuses on
individual error
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
FUTURE
Generally blame free
reporting
Individuals held to
account
Team-based training
more common
Systems approach to
hazards & prevention
An Organisation with Memory
Learning from adverse events in the British NHS
PAST
Lack of awareness of
risk management
Short term fixing of
problems
Adverse events
regarded as `one-offs’
Lessons seen as only
relevant for team
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
FUTURE
Risk & safety training
provided
Emphasis on sustained
risk reduction
Potential for repeated
events recognised
Lessons may be
relevant to others
National Centre for Patient
Safety in Switzerland (NCPS)
Identify
existing patient safety initiatives
Establish central database of resources and
information and research programme
Enhance methods of investigation and
analysis
Disseminate lessons learned and initiate risk
reduction programmes
Provide support and guidance for patients
and staff
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Central themes of NCPS
Building
on international work, but
developing uniquely Swiss programme
Broad strategy and positive approach to
patient safety
Systems thinking and interventions
Strong emphasis on organisational culture
Unique focus on supporting and caring for
patients and staff
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Key tasks in Phase II
Consultation
and gaining support from
patients and professionals
Integration of patient safety with broad
quality initiatives
Debate on the need for an open culture
Balance of immediate improvements and
long term re-design of systems
The role of financial and legal pressures
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London
Looking to the future
Potentially
the first National Patient Safety
Centre in Europe
Balancing local and national systems
Development of international links within
healthcare and with other industries
Maintaining a positive patient centred
approach
Clinical Risk Unit
University College London