Proibicionismo Contribuições para um debate sobre as - iscte-iul
Download
Report
Transcript Proibicionismo Contribuições para um debate sobre as - iscte-iul
Prohibitionism
contributions for a debate about the
social goals of justice institutions
António Pedro Dores, June 2004
http://home.iscte.pt/~apad
Dep. Sociologia e CIES / ISCTE, Lisboa -Portugal
Practical problem
At least half of inmates world wide participate
in drug market
Struggle against drug addicted has been
unsuccessful
World economy is drug addict
What is prohibicionism as a social process?
Sociological problem
How homeopathic institutional judicial
interventions organize (in)security feelings
and (des)order?
Sociological hypothesis
Justice modern dogmatic goals should not be
accepted as part of social theory
Justice should not be understood as
superstructure but as infrastructure
Justice should be understood as a weberian
way of disposing social violence, using it
Prohibitions
Quotidian prohibitions should be understand
as institutional violence menace serving
social parties against another parties
Justice institutions serve political design
legality
Justice is another way to proceed with
politics, even – or because – the state powers
separation democratic principal
Prohibitionism
Specialized law (commercial, labour, criminal,
fiscal) has to match and has to manipulate
different kinds of social relationships
Each kind of law and jurisprudence are used
to control market boarders and social actors
liberty
Expanding criminal law (as “drug war” does)
means more legal violence against excluded
people and less liberty degrees available
Prisons
Prison systems all over the world serves
prohibitionist global policy
Prison system is part of the institutional
apparatus of neo-liberal violence against
excluded people
Prison Reform must be a moral discussion on
civilizational political goals
END
Prohibitionism
Modernity structure
(infra-structure-violence vs super-structure-control)
Maintenance and transformation
(social movements vs institutions)
Prohibitions as judicial manipulation of judicial
institutions