Transcript Nagy_Turkey_Jordan

Implementing Water accounts in a Water
Scarce Region (Turkey and Jordan)
Michael Nagy
Water Accounts and Economics
Workshop
European Environment Agency
Copenhagen, 7-8 September 2010
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
© benoitb
Background of my involvement
 Turkey:
 Expert in the project „Upgrading the Statistical System of Turkey (USST
II)“ – component „Environment Statistics“ (Eurostat, 2008-2009)
 Jordan:
 Expert in the project „Pilot Action on Data Harmonisation for the
Development of a National Water Information System in Jordan”
(EMWIS, 2010)
2
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
What is the main motivation of the countries?
 Turkey:
 Lead by TurkStat, close cooperation with State Hydraulic Works (DSI)
 Application of a global statistical standard for various purposes:
 Tool to support water policies
 Demonstration of ressource efficiencies and ressource productivities
 Allocation of water uses and water consumption to the right industry (or households)
 Demonstration of water losses
 Time series
 Regional water accounts
 International comparability
 Jordan:
 Cooperation of NSO and MoW
 Water accounts as central concept for the National Water Information System
 Application of a global statistical standard for various purposes:
 Very similar to Turkey, but hybrid tables already developed
 Water quality issues (salinity, pollution, fossile/non fossile) of importance
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
3
Turkish Pilot Study
Evapotranspiration
Precipitation
Atmosphere
Inland Water Resource System
Surface water
Natural transfers
(e.g. infiltration,
seepage, etc.)
Inflows
downstream
basins and
aquifers
outside
the territory
of reference
Outflows
Groundwater
Collection of
precipitation
Sea
Returns
Sea
Evapotranspiration
Returns
Abstraction
Sewerage
Returns
accounts and hybrid accounts
on a regular basis
• Physical Asset Accounts
• Regional water accounts
Soil water
(reservoirs, lakes, rivers,
snow, ice and glaciers)
Abstraction
Project Period:
September 08 – September 09
Reference Year: 2004
Tables for pilot study:
• Physical supply and use-table
• Transfers within the economy
Long-term goals:
• produce PSUT, Emission
upstream
basins and
aquifers
outside
the territory
of reference
Households
Other Industries
(incl. Agriculture)
Rest of
the World
Economy
Imports
Water collection,
treatment and supply
Exports
Economy
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Rest of
the World
Economy
4
Main data sources (basically
OECD/Eurostat-JQ on Inland Waters)
 Agriculture (irrigation canals and permits for GW-abstraction): DSI
 Forestry (irrigation of new plantations): Ministry of Environment and








Forestry
Fishery: MARA
Hydropower: Electricity Generation Copany Inc.; General Directorate of
electrical power resources survey and development administration
Thermal Power Plants: TurkStat (Scope of survey: > 100 MW capacity)
Manufacturing Industries: TurkStat – Industry survey (all
establishments in public sector + large scale establishments in private =
about 80% of value added of private sector establishments with >=10
employees
Mining and Quarrying: TurkStat (sample survey)
Municipalites + Communities (water supply and sewerage): TurkStat
Villages: Estimations for households
Services, Administration: self-supply unknown
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Working Steps
Data gathering tables: Compilation of data from the different data
sources according to SEEAW standard tables:
1.





Working tables
2.

Compact presentation of data, including clear indication of uncertainties and
imbalances
Presentation tables
3.


4.
5.
Extension of SEEAW standard tables according to sub-classifications used in
Turkish water statistics (e.g. DSI irrigation canals, water abstraction by
Industrial Organized Zones etc.)
Clarification of system boundary issues (e.g. use of irrigation water from
irrigation canals)
Clarification of certain ISIC issues
Gap filling and metadata
Identification of imbalances
Expert judgement applied to deal with uncertainties and imbalances
METAINFORMATION provided
Consultation of data providers and data users (joint meeting)
Drafting of a roadmap for regular water accounts
6
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Classification issues: Linking data from
environment statistics with ISIC
 ISIC 36 (Water Supply Industry):
 Water supply in municipalities
 Water supply in villages
 Water supplied by tanker
 Water supplied within Organized Industrial Zones
 DSI irrigation canals
 ISIC 37 (Sewerage Industry):
 Waste water collection in municipalities
 Waste water collection in villages
 Waste water collection in Organized Industrial Zones
 DSI drainage canals
7
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Extension of SEEAW Standard Tables (Example
Abstraction from Water Resources)
1.i. From water resources:
1.i.1 Surface water
1.i.1.a Rivers
1.i.1.b Lakes
1.i.1.c Artificial Reservoirs, of which
1.i.1.c.1 Large dams
1.i.1.c.2 Small dams (artificial lakes)
1.i.2 Groundwater
1.i.3 Soil water
1.i.4 Unknown
Bold = SEEAW standard data item
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
8
Problems encountered
 Missing and/or unclear data:
 Wastewater discharges of households to sewerage
 Drainage water in drainage canals
 Irrigation water from irrigation canals
 Actual groundwater abstraction by agriculture
 Forestry
 Energy Sector
 Classification issues (ISIC-Activities)
 Industrial Organized Zones
 Irrigation canals
 Separation of water supply and sewerage in Communities
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
System boundaries: irrigation canals
Reservoir
10
0
Irrigated farmland
10
10
Irrigated farmland
10
10
Irrigated farmland
Irrigated farmland
Irrigation canals
Losses
10
Irrigated farmland
Losses
Questions:
How to account the 100 units taken from the reservoir in SEEAW PSUT?
How to account the 50 units taken by the farmers out of the canals in SEEAW PSUT?
Is the „Reservoir“ (dam) part of the environment or part of the economy?
System boundaries: Organized Industrial Zones
Worker‘s homes
Manuf. Industry
Manuf. Industry
Manuf. Industry
PWS
Water supply
unit
WWTP
Services
TR: Example Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery (2004)
DRAFT – not to be quoted!
Evapo-transpiration and
incorporation in products
Sewerage (ISIC 37)
Direct precipitation
Wastewater reuse
?
27321
Evaporation from
open canals
32
??
Agriculture,
Forestry, Fishery
(01 - 03)
14160
DSI – irrigation
canals (ISIC 36)
14127
1.3
Households and other
sectors
Losses
(infiltration)
from canals
Public water supply
communities (ISIC 36)
13273
111 + ?
Losses in
distribution
9418
??
23545
6260
12
Freshwater Resources
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Physical use table (draft – not to be quoted)
13
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Physical supply table (draft – not to be
quoted)
14
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Transfers within economy (draft – not to be
quoted)
15
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Selected results (draft – not to be quoted)
16
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Selected results (draft – not to be quoted)
Water supply to other economic units
17
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Proposed next steps
 Presentation of results in flow diagrams (see





Australian example next 2 slides)
Development of time series
Development of emission accounts and physical asset
accounts
Presentation with economic data
Spatial disaggregation (according to regions)
Regular dissemination and use as tool in policy
making
18
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Key
Australia – physical water supply and use, 2004-05 (GL)
Wastewater
Water
Reuse water
?
?
38
Sewerage
ISIC 37
?
280
?
7
?
13
?
6
?
78
Water Supply
ISIC 36
2
?
5329
72
Agriculture
ISIC 1
6582
577
?
341
Mining*
ISIC 5-9
529
?
115
Manufacturing*
ISIC 10-33
246
227
556
Electricity
ISIC 35
60172
110
1874
Other ISIC
2,3,38,39, 45-99
862
59924
Households
232
385
?
Inland Water Resources
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October1232
2010
* Note shown is the supply of distributed water and reuse water by mining and manufacturing, 25 GL in total.
0
11160
2045
The Sea
Key
Wastewater
Water
Reuse water
Australia – monetary water supply and use, 2004-05 (million AUD$)
?
?
?
Sewerage
ISIC 37
55
?
?
?
97
?
772
?
Water Supply
ISIC 36
2357
?
?
?
291
53
Agriculture
ISIC 1
?
?
252
232
Mining*
ISIC 5-9
?
?
91
Manufacturing*
ISIC 10-33
?
?
698
Electricity
ISIC 35
?
?
2147
Other ISIC
2,3,38,39, 45-99
?
?
Households
?
?
?
?
Inland Water Resources
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October ?2010
* Note shown is the supply of distributed water and reuse water by mining and manufacturing, 25 GL in total. No monetary available for these.
?
The Sea
Water Accounts in Jordan
 Implemented by the NSO
 MoW is developing a National Water Information System
with SEEAW as central concept
 Challenges:
 Agreements between various data providers and data users for data
exchange
 Different concepts, terminologies etc. to be linked
 Work in progress…
21
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
Main Conclusions

Water scarce countries have strong interest to implement Water Accounts (e.g.
Australia has it already for several years)

UN-SEEAW is usually the standard they look at

Even without economic information phyisical accounts are useful

Temporal and spatial disaggregation important (transfers, subnational
problems,…)

Lot of added value because of link to SNA

Disaggregation of SEEAW according to policy needs, national priorities and
specific situation (e.g. water quality aspects in PSUT) needed.

International guidance for practical implementation needs to be extended (e.g.
system boundary issues)

SEEAW revision should take into consideration identified problems

Leading organization for production of environmental accounts to be identified +
agreements between data producers and data users of importance

Problem with data from different sources  inaccuracies <> consumption!

Business processes and QA/QC-procedures to be determined

Metadata!
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010
22
Contact & Information
Michael Nagy
[email protected]
Phone: +43-1-31304-3490
Umweltbundesamt
www.umweltbundesamt.at
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop
European Environment Agency
Copenhagen ■ 7-8 October 2010
23
Water Accounts and Economics Workshop, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 7-8 October 2010