Transcript MOPPIN up Dodge - policy review tv

Problem Orientated Partnerships
Tackling Local Priorities
Gary Salisbury - PC 1623
Sue Roach
Community Safety Manager
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
Overview
MOPPIN – NIM POP
Ditch
the
Dealer
2000 2002
2005
2006
2007
The Problem
• In the beginning - position of weakness
• Process for the way forward:




Scanning
Analysis
Response
Assessment
Scanning
Scanning
– Unsustainable tenancies
– Crime attractor/generator
– Service provider ‘hotspot’
– Gang culture: FPOG
– Deprived community
– Overt drug dealing/taking
– Under used community
centre
– No diversionary activities
– Blame culture
Analysis
•
Long process - very important
•
Listen
1. Community
2. Stakeholders/Organisations
•
Identify local priorities
Analysis
Problem Analysis Triangle
Offenders
Heart
of the
Problem
Location
Victims
Quantitative analysis
Average Cost of BIAD, Damage and ASB for Jan, Feb & March 2004/5
(Source: The Economic & Social Cost of Crime, Home Office Research paper 217)
$20,650
$48,323
BIAD
Damage
ASB
$30,560
Quantitative analysis
Environmental Cleaning Costs
£3878.26 for Jan, Feb, March 2004/05
Community Consultation
Essential
 Broad methods
 PACT
 TASK FORCE
 Alternative methods
 Option Study
 MAPPIN
 EVA
Qualitative Analysis
• CGA Option Study
– Door to Door Survey
– Dedicated Staff
– Response of 80%
– Areas covered:
• Length occupancy
• Involvement in Community
• Problems on Estate
Qualitative Analysis
Environmental Visual Audit
Conclusion
Neighbourhood Policing/Neighbourhood
Management
 Providing the public with access to local
policing
 Offering opportunities to influence local
priorities
 Working with partners to deliver positive
interventions
 Tackling priorities identified by local people
 Providing answers to the public on what has
been done
Response is 3 strand approach
• Early Intervention/Prevention
• Legal enforcement
• Situational crime prevention/Target
hardening
Response
Social Crime prevention approach
Restorative justice
GRIP/YIP/PAYP(early intervention)
Outreach work (LYS)
Princes Trust
Reparation
Tower Project (drug rehabilitation
project)
Promote community centre use
School involvement
Acceptable Behaviour Contracts
Streetwise Soccer
Residents group – buddies
Response
10 ASBOs
12 drug warrants
2 ASB Injunctions
3 Closure Orders
Individual Support Orders
Parenting Orders
High profile arrests
Prosecution of persistent
offenders
8 Notices of Seeking Possession
1 Demotion of Tenancy
3 Evictions
Target offenders
Target interventions
INTL visits
Rat trap
Patrol & hotspots
Mobile Police Station
Response
Situational crime prevention approaches
Target hardening
Estate clean up
Improve lighting
Improve fencing
Funding for CCTV
Option appraisal Crummock Rd
Influence redesign of Crummock Rd
Reduce No’s of play areas
Improve existing play areas
Assessment
• What works:
Important to report back to community
 Use of Media
Positive activities show sustainability
Assessment
Quantitative
Start
All crime
63
Dwelling burglaries 11
Criminal damage
41
All reports
242
ASB reports
53
Void properties
35
% Reductions
Target
Actual
15%
49% 
20%
91% 
20%
66% 
15%
34% 
20%
29% 
50%
85% 
Assessment
Quantitative
• Economic & Social Cost Savings
– Savings first three months of 2007:
• £35,468.
– Potential Annual Saving: £141,872
• Cost Saving - CGA
– Savings first three months 2007:
• £49,803
– Potential Annual Saving: £199,212
Assessment
Quantitative
• Disrupt drug dealing
• Dissolve FPOG
•
Crummock Road
Gates
Option appraisal
Fire Brigade
Assessment
• Remove fear of crime
Random sampling
Community Activities
Community priority
 CCTV
Assessment Qualitative
• Community involvement
Raft
CGA Community
Development Officer
Princes Trust
PACT
• Promote sustainable change
Community Centre
 Street Wise Soccer
Sure Start
One Voice NM