Medicines safety in WHO - World Health Organization
Download
Report
Transcript Medicines safety in WHO - World Health Organization
Medicines safety in WHO: promoting best
practices in Pharmacovigilance
Dr Shanthi Pal
Quality and Safety of Medicines
WHO
TBS_MAR_ 2011
1
What is pharmacovigilance
The science and activities relating to the detection,
assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse
effects or any other drug-related problems.
(The Importance of Pharmacovigilance, WHO 2002)
A tool for generating evidence to inform policies
2
TBS_MAR_ 2011
2
Birth of modern pharmacovigilance
Thalidomide – Phocomelia 1961
TBS_MAR_ 2011
3
16th World Health Assembly 1963
Assembly Resolution 16.36 - Clinical and
Pharmacological Evaluation of Drugs
INVITES Member States to arrange for a systematic
collection of information on serious adverse drug
reactions observed during the development of a
drug and, in particular, after its release for general
use.
TBS_MAR_ 2011
4
WHO Programme
for
140
International National
Drug Monitoring
Centres
WHO
Collaborating
Centre, Uppsala
WHO
WHO
Collaborating
Centre, Ghana
WHO
Collaborating
Centre, Morocco
TBS_MAR_ 2011
5
Roles and Responsibilities
WHO
Policies and strategies for PV
Guidelines, norms and
standards
Exchange of information
Systems strengthening
Training and capacity
building
Dialogue with donors &
public health programmes
TBS_MAR_ 2011
WHO Collaborating Centres
Tools and technologies
Research and Innovation
Implementation / proof of
concept
Everyday technical support
Training and capacity
building
Exchange of information
6
Policies (WHO)
Implementation
WHO
WHO CCs
ADR Data
Country Analysis
Signals
Communication
Based on spontaneous
reporting
Database
TBS_MAR_ 2011
7
Advisory Committee on Safety of Medicinal
Products (ACSoMP)
The Advisory Committee on Safety of Medicinal Products shall
provide advice on pharmacovigilance policy and issues related
to the safety and effectiveness of medicinal products
to the relevant Assistant Director-General in WHO and through him /
her
to the Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring (the
Uppsala Monitoring Centre), and
to the Member States of WHO.
TBS_MAR_ 2011
9
The WHO PV strategy
What defines it
TBS_MAR_ 2011
10
Putting the horse in front of the cart
AFRICA
If there are no systems, there will
be no evidence
TBS_MAR_ 2011
11
Morbidity profile (Clinical case mix)
Distinct from developed countries
Infectious diseases – 90% of global burden
Determines the pharmaceutical characteristics
Determines the Adverse event profile
TBS_MAR_ 2011
12
Characteristics of the Pharmaceutical Setting
Inefficient pharmaceutical procurement; inadequate
storage facilities and distribution practices
Few functional reputable or local pharmaceutical
companies
Lax border controls and customs entry points
Weak regulatory systems
TBS_MAR_ 2011
13
TBS_MAR_ 2011
14
TBS_MAR_ 2011
15
Diethylene glycol tragedy in Nigeria
NAFDAC Nigeria
Paracetamol 1989
> 100 deaths (children)
Paracetamol + Chlorpheniramine
2009
(teething mixture – ‘My Pikin’)
~100 deaths (children)
~110 Acute renal failure
PV scope needs to be expanded to address quality issues
TBS_MAR_ 2011
16
Up to 50% of ADRs are preventable
TBS_MAR_ 2011
17
Pharmacovigilance system that
Records errors
Analyses
Learns
Implements checks
Prevents errors
TBS_MAR_ 2011
18
Spontaneous reporting: Bedrock of
PV these forty years.
But: Lack of denominator data
Public health programmes need to
address key safety questions, quickly
provide rates of AEs
monitor AEs in special populations (children..)
TBS_MAR_ 2011
19
Addressing the PV needs of public health
programmes
Dystonia with ACTs ?
Result of malnutrition / repeated treatment with ACTs?
Malaria
HIV/AIDS
Delete d4t?; NVP in women?
Can we use TDF without renal monitoring?
Risk of severe anaemia in children with AZT?
Use NVP & rifampicin concomitantly in HIV/TB patients?
TBS_MAR_ 2011
20
Methodological development
Additional data sources
Cohort Event Monitoring
recording patients exposed (cohort, target 10 000)
active and systematic follow-up for adverse events
provides incidence rates and risk profile
identification of sub-groups at risk
piloted in Tanzania and Nigeria for malaria treatment
supported by CemFlow ™ management tool
TBS_MAR_ 2011
21
WHO
has developed a protocol for
cohort event monitoring (CEM)
of
antimalarials and
ARVs
is implementing CEM of
antimalarials in Africa
has developed 'Pregnancy
register' protocol
TBS_MAR_ 2011
22
Understanding what's available
and what's needed in countries
TBS_MAR_ 2011
23
Challenges to Pharmacovigilance
TBS_MAR_ 2011
24
Type of assistance needed
TBS_MAR_ 2011
25
PV consultants for
AFRICA: PVSF
WHO CC for advocacy and
training in PV, Accra, Ghana
TBS_MAR_ 2011
26
Technical Solutions for Africa
VigiFlow: tool for national ICSR
management and submission to
WHO/UMC
Provides country with a national
database
E2b compliant
Incorporates MEDRA
Free software update and maintenance
by UMC
Challenge: access to
broadband internet
Solution: Silverlite
TBS_MAR_ 2011
27
Joint WHO/Global Fund
pharmacovigilance strategy
Establish basic functions and minimum requirements of
national pharmacovigilance system
Min PV req
pharmacovigilance toolkit to support training and development
www.pvafrica.org/toolkit
Strong wording in Round 10 requesting countries to include PV
TBS_MAR_ 2011
28
http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/
safety_efficacy/saf_pub/en/
TBS_MAR_ 2011
29
TBS_MAR_ 2011
30
What gets measured, gets done
Success indicators
Outcomes
Impact
TBS_MAR_ 2011
31
Additional stakeholders: the full
picture
Direct patient reporting
WHO guidelines
TBS_MAR_ 2011
32
Our strategy
Understanding the local needs
Making a 'deal' with public health programmes
Bringing in additional stakeholders
Expanding the scope of PV
More patient centred
TBS_MAR_ 2011
34
A systems approach
We need to install systems and structures in place
To promote PV as 'best practice'
That aim to improve quality of care
While addressing the safety, effectiveness and quality
of medicines
TBS_MAR_ 2011
35
Maintain as the cheapest,
easiest, most sustainable
method
3 tiers-approach for WHO
1. As before
(Spontaneous reporting)
Methods, additional use (errors,
quality issues, resistance), more
2. More than before
centres, patient focused
Tools
Handbooks
New partners,
Pilot
3. As never before
Public
Measure,
Resources
Indicators
Fundraising (EuropeAid; BMGF; FP7)
Networks of excellence (PVSF)
TBS_MAR_ 2011
36
Thank you
The impossible: we are on it
For miracles: expect some delay
Website
www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/en
TBS_MAR_ 2011
37