Update from Health Financing meeting conducted on 6th
Download
Report
Transcript Update from Health Financing meeting conducted on 6th
Technical Review Meeting (TRM),
Blue Pearl 6-8 September, 2010
Department of Policy and Planning
Background
◦ `Objective Of the Meeting
Areas covered
Issues raised
Way Forward
Provide
evidence to inform the
scale up of health insurance in
Tanzania
Identify
key steps to achieve UC
Historical
background and
Situation analysis
Who
pays and who benefits?
FIA
pro poor
BIA
pro rich
In Tanzania, compared to other countries,
health financing to be more or less
progressive
Benefits are similar as in other countries,
are regressive
The typical distributions of the poor going
to lower level facilities.
The CHF is regressive by design
Matching grant - Is it not perpetrating
inequity?
A flat rate premium, means everyone pays
the same irrespective of income
The scheme also targets the poorest.
Concern
◦ If coverage were to expand and
premia to increase, the regressivity
of the CHF would be an issue
Current status of the NHIF and CHF
◦ Support to poor pregnant women
SHIB
◦ Formal Private and planning for informal
Private sector
◦ Private firms
◦
Micro insurances
◦
All NSSF members contribute but very
few benefit, SHIB members contribute
but NOT benefiting from the scheme
Health Funders Board
Adverse Selection
Price inflation (prices charged by private
providers),
Patients not respecting referral system
Weak management – especially CHF and
Micro
Limited benefit package
Establishment of district drug buffer stocks
for supplementary drug supply
Need to wake up a sleeping giant.
◦ Establishment of bank accounts and petty
cash
No
incentives for districts to promote
CHF
Office
bearers of the scheme are often
overburdened and not full-time
professionals.
Poor
health insurance literacy within
the population
Regulatory framework for health insurance
◦ Many players
◦ Different perspectives
◦ Some how different objectives
◦ Should we put health insurance in social
security or leave it out?
◦ Contributions of the community are
rather limited, hence low enrolment
How are we going to handle the informal
sector? Exempt? Or pay for them and issue
a card? Who will pay for them?
◦ Scaling-up for universal coverage is also
implying an increase in usage of services
– need for supply side investment to meet
increased demand
◦ Fragmentation is an issue
Affects financial sustainability and
equity
Modeling - Options to expand health
insurance in Tanzania. Done in shorter time
◦ UC per se would have limited impact on GDP and
gvt exp on health,
◦ HOWEVER
HSS WILL REQUIRE HUGE INVESTIMENT
◦ Key lesson from other countries
Fund authority response to Insurance
Scheme
Earmarked tax works - Ghana and
Thailand
It is possible to collaborate with social
security fund need action -
A minimum package of Health and Related
Management Activities
The required inputs and outputs will be
determined as per level of care.
Essential Health Package(EHP)/Services per
level of care
Review the Service Agreement
Review the stock list at MSD and TFDA per level
of care
◦ Medicines
◦ Devices
◦ Reagents
MOHSW + PMORALG +PARTINERS + MSD+TFDA
Expand Network at all Levels for both public and
private as per MMAM and Policy.
PPP
Universal Coverage of the Financing
Agenda i.e Social H.I Scheme◦ Action Plan
◦ PRIVATE FORMAL
◦ INFORMAL
A
lot is in Place in use available Data
Need to develop a milestone for health
financing
Financing Strategy