Morning Keynote Address: Biases & Mistakes in Epilepsy Care
Download
Report
Transcript Morning Keynote Address: Biases & Mistakes in Epilepsy Care
Biases & Mistakes
in Epilepsy Care
Orrin Devinsky, M.D.
NYU Langone Epilepsy Center
Biases in Epilepsy Care: Lessons
of Behavioral Economics
Diagnostic
Bias
Prospect Theory
Law of Small Numbers
Status Quo Bias
Availability Heuristic
Biases in Medicine: Kahneman &
Tversky’s Lessons
Loss
aversion
Anchoring
Framing
What You See is All There Is
What do NBA coaches, mothers
and doctors have in common?
The
Diagnostic Bias
1st
round v. 2nd round choice
Diagnosis to doctor = child to mother
Reliance
on prior diagnosis
Failure to consider other disorders
Convulsive syncope
Nonepileptic psychogenic seizures
Failure to consider diagnostic changes
Prospect Theory
Decisions
about alternatives with risk
where final outcome risks are known,
people decide on potential values of
losses or gain
Risk averse (insurance policy)
Risk acceptance (lottery ticket)
Prospect Theory:
Epilepsy Care
Felbamate is too dangerous
Risk of death is <1/10,000
is too dangerous – <1/1500
Refractory epilepsy is ok, it is what we are
used to
Surgery
Yearly risk of MVA in 1/8000
Yearly risk of SUDEP in patients with refractory
epilepsy: >1/500
Yearly risk of other epilepsy related mortality in patients
with refractory epilepsy: >1/500
Availability Heuristic
If
you can think of it, it must be important
Mental Shortcut: ease of example coming
to mind = value to make judgment about
probability of event
News of danger – people worry about rare
causes of illness or death that receive
media attention (9/11 and air travel)
Letter K – first letter or third letter in
average English word? (2x difference)
Availability Heuristic:
Epilepsy Care
Valproic
acid (Depakote) is a common
cause of liver disease
Lamotrigine (Lamictal) is a common cause
of life-threatening rash
Patients & families are driven by prior
experience
10 drugs don’t work, ?11th
Bad: someone on the web told me…
Good:
QOL & Availability Heuristic:
A Different View
QOL
- Defined by patient not MD
Should patient’s perspective be filtered
through “objective medical lens”? - NO
QOL is about listening, changing
perspective, and using the patients’
view as ultimate measure of outcome
QOL: Clinical Relevance
QOL
issues most relevant to chronic
disorders, problems beyond disease
symptoms
Hypertenstion – b-blockers v. ACE inhibitors
(Experts wrong!)
Epilepsy is a paradigm of a QOL disorder:
seizures are infrequent, AED effects,
comorbid disorders (depression, migraine) &
psychosocial problems are often chronic
Law of Small Numbers
Hasty
generalizations from a few
examples
Initial set of data is usually biased
Scientists understand power and statistics
in their discipline, but often forget it when
they think outside their discipline
Humans are Anecdote Driven
We
evolved to understand individual
instances very well, not statistics
A moving story about a castaway dog or
sick children v. a genocide of ~800k
Would
you give more for a dog or 100 sick
kids?
Rwanda v. OJ Simpson – media coverage
Vaccines
cause autism (NO!)
Humans are Anecdote Driven
Sabril
(vigabatrin) can cause blindness
Felbatol (felbamate) can be deadly
People can become vegetables after
spinal taps
You only need to hear about one bad
case…and it doesn’t have to be true
Need to examine the evidence
Failure to Understand
Numbers
The
medical literature is very confusing,
even for scientists and doctors
Few doctors and fewer patients have
formal statistical training
The Monte Hall problem
AED/blood count/liver tests and Cancer
Screening – America makes political not
wise choices
Status Quo Bias
Doctors
and patients fall victim
Doctors accept previous diagnoses
Doctors advocate treatments that are
‘accepted’ but not ‘proven’
Patients accept poorly controlled seizures
and/or side effects
Patients accept ‘communal experience’
although unproven/anedotal
We get used to what
we get used to
What
do these all have in common?
Lottery
winners
Quadriplegics
Farmers whose roosters rape chickens
People who eat mediocre blueberries
Parents of kids with Lennox-Gastaut
Syndrome
Loss Aversion
People
prefer to avoid losses more than
they seek equal gains
Roughly two-fold
Endowment effect: people value
something they own than something of
identical value
Duke
tickets
Loss Aversion: Epilepsy Care
Seizure
control is the loss
The existing drug regimen is safety – the devil
you know
Gamble: seizure freedom/stable level of
incomplete control v. greater alertness,
memory, mood, bone health?
Loss Aversion: Epilepsy Care
How
fearful are you of a side effect in a new
drug versus an existing one?
Doctors like to add medicines more than they
like to take them away
The gabapentin story
PB
30
yo woman, refractory complex partial
seizures
Any side effects? No!
Converted from phenobarbital to
carbamazepine (Tegretol, Carbatrol)
Boss observed dramatic improvement in
mood, memory and mental processing speed
and ‘intelligence’
Errors in Assessing Risk
Surgery is too dangerous
Living with chronic epilepsy can be dangerous
Changing medications is too risky
Change can be risky; No change can be risky
The grass is browner on the other side
Breakthrough seizure
Living with chronic side effects has risks
We accept the negatives we think we know but fear
the change to make them better
Do no harm, but judiciously assess risk
Anchoring
Over-reliance
on a specific piece of
information
Our decisions are tied to arbitrary anchors
Dan Ariely – write down last 2 digits of
your SS#; now lets auction wine or
chocolate
Attentional anchor – who is happier?
Californians or mid-Westerners?
Anchoring
Patients
and doctors often allow one piece
of information to dominate their decision
on a topic that is complex
What
we heard last about a drug or treatment
Nickname – Dopamax
Single side effect – weight gain (Valproic acid)
Frames & Framing
– scheme of interpretation using
stereotypes, anecdotes and accepted
‘norms’ that people use to understand
and respond
Framing – how information is packaged
dramatically influences how we respond
to it. Presenting the same data in different
frames leads to very different
interpretations.
Frames
Frames & Framing:
Epilepsy Care
Many
patient see memory problems as
primarily due to medications when they
are often an effect of epilepsy
Framing – 80% of children on
levetiracetam (Keppra) have no significant
behavioral problems v. 20% of children on
levetiracetam have significant behavioral
problems
Failure to Understand Framing
“Surgery is 99.95% safe” is very different than
“Someone died from surgery” or “1 in 1500 die”.
Substitute benign brain tumor for epilepsy surgery
Mentally invert presentations to better understand
pros and cons
Patients must trust their doctors, but they must also
assess their doctor’s bias and their own
The neurosurgeon, the radiation oncologist & the
neuro-oncologist
What You See is All There Is
(WYSIATS)
People make decisions based on limited
data by using available information and
ignoring information that is not available
In Epilepsy: assume we understand causes
of seizures when we may only have 1020% of the data
Missing Mood Disorders
All
epilepsy patients at increased risk
Patients must tell; doctors must ask –
both often fail
Refractory epilepsy
Greater contributor to impaired
Quality of Life than seizures
Depression in up to 50%
Suicidal ideation - 20% in past 6 mos
Majority are untreated
Two Great Lies in
Epilepsy
Seizures don’t hurt the brain
They cause structural and functional
impairment that can progress over time
Seizures are never fatal
SUDEP
Sudden Unexplained Death
in Epilepsy (SUDEP)
General population (2–3)
Epilepsy incidence population (5)
Epilepsy prevalence population (7)
Patients in clinical trials (30–50)
Patients undergoing vagus nerve stimulation (41)
Patients referred to epilepsy centers (50–60)
Surgical candidates (90)
Surgical failures (150)
Missing The Big Picture
Focus on person, not diagnosis
Listen, beyond the words to feelings
See their world: situations influence health
Look patient in the eyes
Speak with family and friends
Therapies are limited by medical box
Therapists - cognitive, psychological, etc
Pragmatic approaches (sometimes key!)
Compliance
Sleep hygiene
Memory lists
The Dangers of Expert
Consensus
MRI offers no real advantage over CT in epilepsy
diagnosis - 1986
Ketogenic diet is not effective - 1990
Felbatol (felbamate) is extremely safe – 1993
Experts convince themselves, other doctors and
patients
Demand evidence or humility
Failure to Reassess
Disorders
change and evolve
New situational factors arise
Need to keep a fresh perspective
Need to cast a broad differential
diagnosis and consider a broad
therapeutic strategy
What was is an excellent but sometimes
dead-wrong indicator of what is
Doctors and Patients
Move in Packs
Doctors
are influenced by peers, thought
leaders, marketing – they are as susceptible
to status quo, texts (eg, JME, absence)
framing as are patients
Doctors in different medical centers, cities,
and regions have different practices
Patients strongly influence each other –
support groups, internet, etc
Failure to be Humble
Most
people don’t enjoy admitting that
they don’t know something
Doctors are expected to have answers,
to have therapies, and if they are
honest, people go to other doctors or
alternative therapists – catch 22
Tell a white lie or admit ignorance?
Common Errors in Therapy
Wrong
diagnosis
Wrong medication selection
Failure to use medications systematically
Start
low, go slow
Consider time of doses v. seizure & side effects
Benign Rolandic Epielspy
Consider
strategies to reduce side effects
For dizziness – oxcarbazepine (Trileptal) after solid
breakfast, not empty stomach
Failure
to document changes carefully
Nonadherence (noncompliance)
Fatigue: Diagnosis and
Causation
Premature
exhaustion in mental or physical
activities, weariness, lack of energy
Common in epilepsy patients
AEDs
Other
drugs (eg, psychiatric drugs)
Seizures
Epilepsy wave activity
Depression
Sleep
disorders
Final Thoughts
should make sense – separate
emotional/gut and rational/reflective
Understand what you do and why
Be an active partner in care
Be skeptical
Be positive, think healthy
Things