Transcript Document

VΙΙ Meeting of the Expert Group on Demand Reduction,
September 13 – 15, 2005, Ottawa, Canada
Data Considerations for Prevention
Programme Performance Indicators
Pernell Clarke
Specialist
Inter-American Observatory on Drugs
CICAD
Summary of Presentation
 Indicators and measurement
 Types of Data
 SIDUC: A tool for evaluation?
 Other options for data gathering
Indicators & Measurement
 Process


Did the intervention take place as was planned?
How good was it?
 Outcomes




Increased knowledge?
Change in attitudes?
Change in behaviour?
Delayed onset of drug use?
Data Collection Types
 Focus Groups
 Unstructured Interviews
 Sample Surveys
 Census
 Administrative Data

Administrative data are collected as a result of
day-to-day operations during a programme
Data Requirements
 Level of drug use


Prevalence
Incidence
 Age of onset of drug use
 Knowledge & Attitudes
 Consequences of drug use
 Related behaviours
SIDUC
Inter-American Uniform Drug Use
Data System
Sistema Inter-Americano de Datos
Uniformes Sobre Consumo de Drogas
Introduction to SIDUC
 SIDUC is a system that gathers data on the demand
for and consumption of drugs
 It utilises a number of research protocols and
instruments to collect uniform indicators on various
aspects of the drug phenomenon
 It has been in existence for about 9 years
 It has been applied throughout the hemisphere in
various population segments
Objectives of SIDUC
 Gather cross-sectional data on drug users
 Gather longitudinal data
 Gather data that is comparable across countries and
across time
 Provide statistics and other info for policy makers
and programme managers
 Continuously monitor the drug problem in the
hemisphere
Types of Protocols








Household Survey
Survey of Secondary School Students
University Students
Juvenile Offenders
Patients in Treatment Centers
Patients in Emergency Rooms
Juvenile Offenders
Prisoners (Soon)
Secondary School Survey Objectives
 To estimate the prevalence of drug use in the
student population
 To estimate the incidence of drug use in the
student population
 Determine the age of first use, frequency of use
and accessibility to drugs
 Find out the characteristics of consumers Vs.
Abstainers
 Determine level of knowledge about the effects of
drugs
Secondary School Survey –
Objectives (cont’d)
 To diagnose the problem of drug use among
secondary school students
 To inform the planning and implementation of
prevention programs
 To evaluate progress
Methodology
 A representative sample of secondary school
students is taken
 Self-administered questionnaire is used to collect
data
 Data is entered and processed
 Univariate and bivariate analyses are performed
 Results are reported
 Ideally, this process is repeated every 2-3 years
SIDUC and Evaluation of
Prevention Programmes
 SIDUC provides a sound basis for quantitative data
collection in evaluation studies
 Many of the indicators are similar to those that are
required in the evaluation of prevention
programmes
 It is scientific
 It has been tried and tested throughout the
hemisphere
 The protocols are readily available
However……
 SIDUC may only be able to measure baseline indicators and
outcomes for the target group
 The instruments and protocols will need to be adapted for
other data requirements
 We (CICAD) do not have protocols for the collection of
qualitative data, but these exist elsewhere (UNODC,
EMCCDA, et al.)
 Focus groups, and administrative records will also need to
be used
 Eventually…………
 Programme managers will need to be sensitised
 Training for potential evaluators will have to be
undertaken
Conclusions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The measurement of indicators requires valid and reliable
data
Valid and reliable information is required to evaluate
programmes
We will require data in a data-scarce culture and
environment
Programme managers will need to be sensitised and
trained to accept this culture
If used in conjunction with other data sources and
methods, SIDUC has the potential to be a useful data
collection tool in the evaluation of prevention programmes
The End
Thank you for your attention!
Pernell Clarke
2005/09/15