Clinical Trial Quality and Compliance: An FDA Perspective
Download
Report
Transcript Clinical Trial Quality and Compliance: An FDA Perspective
The IND Process
David A. Lepay, M.D., Ph.D.
Senior Advisor for Clinical Science
Office of the Commissioner, US FDA
Johns Hopkins Program
December 10, 2001
FDA’s Mission
FDA has a broad public protection mission
Ensure the safe use of regulated products
that are themselves safe and efficacious
Underlying this mission is FDA decisionmaking on product applications and labeling
Based on complete and accurate information from
well-designed, ethically-conducted, and wellmonitored clinical research
FDA’s Mission in Clinical
Research
Ensure Implementation of Good Clinical
Practice Standards
Embodied in FDA regulation and guidance
since the 1960’s and ‘70’s
International Standard (ICH E6) since 1996
Enforced through FDA’s review process and
in its program of on-site inspections
U.S. Clinical Investigator inspections from 1962
Ethics Committee (IRB) inspections from 1978
International CI inspections from 1980
GCP is Comprehensive
International ethical and scientific quality
standard for designing, conducting,
recording, and reporting trials that involve
the participation of human subjects
GCP embraces trial objectives, trial design,
study oversight, data collection and quality
assurance, study analysis, as well as human
subject protection in studies that support
product applications
Good Clinical Practice
GCP is most fundamentally a System of
Shared Responsibilities
Clinical Investigators
Institutions/Institutional Review Boards
Industry (Sponsors/Monitors)
Government Regulators
FDA’s Authority to Regulate
Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act
Requires that an FDA approved
marketing or research permit be
obtained before certain commodities
(such as human drugs, medical devices,
veterinary drugs, food additives, etc.)
may move across state lines
Pharmaceuticals may move
across state lines during two
stages of human use
Research prior to “approval”
Requires research permit: e.g,
Investigational New Drug Exemption (IND)
Marketing after “approval”
Requires marketing permit: e.g., New Drug
Application (NDA)
What is an IND/IDE ?
An exemption from the law which
otherwise requires that a drug (biologic,
device) be approved before it can be
transported across state lines
The standard for approval is evidence of
safety and efficacy
The IND exemption is granted for purposes
of clinical investigation (research)
Importance of the IND
Affirms a body of knowledge about the
manufacturing, pharmacology, and
toxicology of the drug to support its use in
human testing
Requires that the clinical investigation(s) be
performed in accordance with Good Clinical
Practice (GCP)
Provides an additional level of protection
through FDA oversight
The FD&C Act Defines
“Drug” Very Broadly
Any of:
Article recognized in the U.S. Pharmacopeia,
official Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the US,
or official National Formulary, or any
supplement
Article intended for use in the diagnosis,
cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of
disease in man or other animals
The FD&C Act Defines
“Drug” Very Broadly
Any of:
Article (other than food) intended to
affect the structure or any function of
the body of man or other animals
Article intended for use as a component of
any article specified in clauses above
Section 201(g) of the FD&C Act
“Clinical Investigation” is
also Defined Broadly
Any experiment in which a drug is
administered or dispensed to, or used
involving, one or more human subjects.
For the purposes of this part, an
experiment is any use of a drug except
for the use of a marketed drug in the
course of medical practice
21 CFR 312.3
So When Is an IND
Required ?
In general: An IND is required when
an unapproved drug (or biologic) is
used in a clinical investigation
What About Approved
Products
No IND is needed when an approved
product is used in the course of medical
practice (even for an indication different
from the approved indication)
But an IND may be required when an
approved products is used in a clinical
investigation
What About Approved
Products
An IND is needed if:
The clinical investigation is intended to be
reported to FDA as a well-controlled study
in support of a new indication or a
significant change in the labeling of the
drug
The clinical investigation is intended to
support a significant change in advertising
for the product
What About Approved
Products
With the above caveats, clinical
investigation of an approved product may
be exempt from IND requirements if:
The investigation does not involve a route of
administration or dosage level or use in a
patient population or other factor that
significantly increases risks AND
The investigation is conducted in accordance
with IRB and informed consent requirements
What About Approved
Products
FDA has generally allowed the IRB to
assess whether risk of an approved
product is increased for a given protocol
But FDA retains final authority for such
determinations
What About Approved
Products
It is also important to note that shelf
chemicals which bear the same “name”
as an approved product are not
considered as “lawfully marketed”
equivalents of the approved product
Approval is specific to dose, formulation,
and applicant
Need for an IND/IDE:
Who to Contact with Questions
Drugs (CDER)
Drug Information Branch: (301) 827-4573
Biological Products (CBER)
(301) 827-0373
Medical Devices (CDRH)
IDE Staff: (301) 594-1190
Food Safety (CFSAN): (202) 418-3126
Related Information
GCP Regulations
IND/IDE Regulations: 21 CFR Part 312/812
IRB Regulations: 21 CFR Part 56
Informed Consent Regs: 21 CFR Part 50
All are accessible at:
www.fda.gov/oc/gcp
Related Information
IND Forms
Available on-line through:
www.fda.gov/cder/regulatory/applications/
IND: What is Required -1General Investigation Plan
Investigator’s Brochure
Protocol(s): Later protocols submitted as
amendments
Chemistry, manufacturing and control
information
Animal pharmacology and toxicology
information
IND: What is Required -2Previous human experience
Additional information
Dependence and abuse potential
Plans for pediatric studies
Amount of information required in each
section depends on novelty of the drug,
extent studied, and known or suspected
safety concerns
The FDA Form “1572”
IND sponsors are required to obtain a signed
FDA Form “1572” from each clinical
investigator, containing:
Name and address of CI
Name and code number of any protocol(s)
Name and address of research facility and
any clinical labs
Name and address of responsible IRB
Names of subinvestigators
Signed commitment by the investigator
Clinical Investigator
Responsibilities*
Personally conduct or supervise
investigations
Ensure all persons assisting in conduct of
studies are informed of their obligations
Ensure informed consent (21 CFR 50) and
IRB review, approval , and reporting (21
CFR 56) requirements are met
*(Form FDA 1572: #9. Commitments)
Clinical Investigator
Responsibilities*
Conduct studies according to relevant,
current protocol
Make changes in a protocol only after
notifying the sponsor
Maintain adequate and accurate records
Make records available for inspection
Agree to comply with all other
requirements in 21 CFR 312
*(Form FDA 1572: #9. Commitments)
Review of IND Application
FDA also has responsibilities under GCP
The focus of FDA’s IND Review is on
safety for human research subjects and
ensuring that the studies will produce
useful information to assess safety and
efficacy of the test product
Reviews are Conducted by
Teams of Specialists
Medical Officer
Consumer Safety Officer/Project Manager
Statistician
Chemist
Pharmacologist
Human Biopharmaceutics
(Microbiologist)
Review of IND Application
Review team has 30 days to review
Focus of review is always on safety/
human subject protection
No News = Good News
IND Application: If Problems..
“Clinical Hold”
Legal order to delay or stop the study in the
U.S.
Subjects may not be given the investigational
drug
May be imposed if:
Exposure of subjects to unreasonable risk
(includes manufacturing problems)
Investigator brochure is misleading, erroneous,
or materially incomplete
Investigator is not qualified
Drug Development Under an IND
Review Team Monitors
New Protocols (IND amendments)
Safety reports
Annual reports
Additional chemistry, animal toxicology,
microbiology data
Review team is available to consult/meet
with sponsors: advise on protocol design,
advise on drug development plan
IND and Non-US Studies
Studies performed outside of the U.S.
may be conducted with or without IND
With an IND:
Test article can be exported from the U.S.
Study must conform to U.S. IND
regulations (including U.S. IRB and
informed consent rules)
IND and Non-US Studies
Studies performed outside of the U.S.
may be conducted with or without IND
Without an IND
May be acceptable for FDA review in
support of a marketing application
Export of the test article from the U.S.
must conform to FDA regulations
Export of an Investigational
Drug
Mechanisms (21 CFR 312.110)
FDA authorization of a written request
from the person that seeks to export
Adequate information; investigational
purposes only; can be legally used in the
importing country for investigation; specifies
quantity/frequency of shipment
FDA authorization of a formal request
from the government of the receiving
country
Export of an Investigational
Drug
1996 law also allows drug export for
investigational use without prior FDA
approval if intended for use in one of 25
countries
Australia; Canada; Israel; Japan, New
Zealand; Switzerland; European Union
Member States (15), Iceland, Norway,
and Liechtenstein
IND Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Drugs
ODE I
Cardio-Renal (110)
301-594-5300
Neuropharm (120)
301-594-2850
Oncology (150)
301-594-2473
Center for Drugs
ODE II
Anesthetic, Critical
Care & Addiction (170)
301-827-7410
Metabolic/Endocrine
(510)
301-827-6430
Pulmonary (570)
301-827-1050
IND Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Drugs
ODE III
Medical Imaging &
Radiopharm (160)
301-827-7510
GI & Coagulation
(180)
301-827-7310
Repro/Urologic (580)
301-827-4260
Center for Drugs
ODE IV
Anti-Infective (520)
301-827-2120
Antiviral (530)
301-827-2330
Special Pathogens &
Immunologic (590)
301-827-2336
IND Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Drugs
ODE V
Derm/Dental (540)
301-827-2021
Anti-Inflammatory,
Analgesic &
Ophthalmic (550)
301-827-2040
Over-the-Counter
(OTC) (560)
301-827-2222
IND Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Biologics (CBER)
Office of Vaccines Research and Review
(301) 827-0654
Office of Blood Research and Review
(301) 827-3524
Office of Therapeutics Research and Review
(301) 827-5099
Office of Generic Drugs
Who to Contact with Questions
OGD Regulatory Support Branch
(301) 827-5862
IDE Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (CDRH)
General, Restorative, and Neurological
Devices: (301) 594-1184
Clinical Laboratory Devices: (301) 5943084
Cardiovascular and Respiratory
Devices: (301) 443-8320
IDE Content/Submission:
Who to Contact with Questions
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (CDRH)
Ophthalmic and ENT Devices: (301)
594-2205
Reproductive, Abdominal, and
Radiological Devices: (301) 594-5072
Dental, Infection Control, and General
Hospital Devices: (301) 443-8879
Sponsor Responsibilities
Selecting Qualified Investigators
Providing investigators with information they need to
conduct an investigation properly.
Ensuring proper monitoring of the investigation(s)
Conduct per protocol
Ethical considerations
Control of investigational product(s)
Safety reporting
Sponsor Responsibilities
Review Ongoing Investigations
A sponsor who discovers that an investigator is
not complying with the signed 1572, general
investigation plan, or regulations shall promptly
either:
secure compliance or
end the investigator’s participation in the
investigation (discontinue shipment and
require return/disposal of drug; notify FDA).
Sponsor-Investigators
FDA regulations allow an individual to be
both study sponsor and clinical
investigator
The Dilemma:
Many sponsor-investigators believe that the
lack of external monitoring and oversight
means that they can perform to a lower
standard
Sponsor-Investigators
The Dilemma -2Where a sponsor and an investigator are the
same, the number of GCP control points is
reduced from four to three
A sponsor-investigator therefore needs to be
more (not less) informed of responsibilities
and more attentive to standards of study
conduct and subject protection
Subject Education
Subject Education is an often neglected
facet of GCP; yet, an educated, fully
informed, and inquiring subject may be
the best resource for ensuring ethical and
quality performance in a clinical trial
The IRB and institution should pay
particular attention to informing subjects
where to go with questions or complaints
Reporting to FDA
Sponsors are required to report serious
non-compliance
But anyone can report complaints in FDAregulated clinical trials to FDA
FDA’s GCP website (www.fda.gov/oc/gcp)
highlights where to report complaints in
clinical trials
New At FDA
FDA has recently established a new
Office for Good Clinical Practice to
coordinate GCP across FDA and
beyond...
OGCP: Structure
Small Office
Strategically located
Office of the Commissioner and its Office of
Science Coordination and Communication
Key Positions
David A. Lepay, MD PhD: Senior Advisor for Clinical
Science and Director
Stan W. Woollen: Associate Director for Bioresearch
Monitoring
Bonnie Lee: Associate Director for Human Subject
Protection Policy
OGCP: Functions
Centralized (Commissioner’s Office)
Role in:
GCP Policy
Bioresearch Monitoring of Clinical Trials
GCP Initiatives
International GCP (harmonization)
activities
GCP Education and Outreach
OGCP and Quality
Assurance
OGCP will reflect FDA’s Commitment to
Quality Assurance
Internally
Coordinating QA for the Agency’s clinical
Bioresearch Monitoring Program of on-site
inspections
Externally
Coordinating Agency GCP policy and
initiatives to enhance the quality of clinical
research
Clinical Trial QA:
What We Should Strive For
Building quality in upfront
Assuring quality throughout
Developing capacity for continuous
quality improvement now and in the
future
Working Together:
Plentiful Opportunities
Well-designed, well-conducted clinical
trials are not easy
If you don’t want to “do it right”, you
should not be conducting clinical trials
The best systems can only emerge
from the broadest possible
participation
Working Together:
Plentiful Opportunities
Quality assurance and quality
improvement are integral to
development of the best systems !