Dr Michiel Luteijn
Download
Report
Transcript Dr Michiel Luteijn
EUROCAT Post-marketing
surveillance for congenital
anomalies
Dr. Johannes Michiel Luteijn
Prof. Joan Morris
BINOCAR Scientific Meeting
Swansea, October 7th, 2014
Thanks to:
Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg
Helen Dolk
Ester Garne
Joanne Given
Maria Loane
Drug use in pregnancy
Two studies estimated 57-79% of pregnant women in Northern
Europe are exposed to prescription drugs during pregnancy.1,2
Little is known about the safety of drugs in pregnancy, partly due
to pregnant women not being involved in pre-marketing studies.
1 Bakker, M. K., Jentink, J., Vroom, F., Van Den Berg, P. B., De Walle, H. E., & De Jong-Van Den Berg, L. T. (2006). Drug prescription patterns before, during and after
pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy-related drugs in the netherlands. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113(5), 559-568
2 Engeland, A., Bramness, J. G., Daltveit, A. K., Ronning, M., Skurtveit, S., & Furu, K. (2008). Prescription drug use among fathers and mothers before and during
pregnancy. A population-based cohort study of 106,000 pregnancies in norway 2004-2006. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 65(5), 653-660
EUROmediCAT signal detection
Aim:
To develop a method of signal detection to be used as a
routine analysis tool.
Dataset
15 EUROCAT registries in EUROmediCAT
Births from 1995-2011
14,950 registrations of congenital anomaly with at least a
single exposure to a drug (ATC-code 5-digit+)
Folic acid, minerals and vitamins not included as exposures
Exclusions
Anomalies with 1-4 digit ATC-code exposures only (n=1,288)
Anomalies with no clear 1st trimester exposure (n=13,377)
Infants with a chromosomal anomaly
Dataset
Drug exposure
5- and 7-digit ATC codes (n = 272, n = 505)
Exposure collected mainly prospective to birth by healthcare
professionals.
Cases
EUROCAT coding committee identified 59 subgroups of nonchromosomal congenital anomaly
Potential drug-congenital anomaly signals must
have at least 3 exposed cases
3 Teratogenic mechanisms of medical drugs. Van Gelder MM, van Rooij IA, Miller RK, Zielhuis GA, de Jong-van den Berg LTW,
Roeleveld N. Hum Reprod. Update. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):378-94
Analysis of drug-CA combinations
Analysis by Fishers’ exact test
Drug A
All other drugs
excluding A
Anomaly
a
b
All other anomalies
c
d
A total of 59 congenital anomalies x 836 drug-codes.
49,324 analyses performed.
19,529 5-digit ATC-code analyses
29,795 7-digit ATC-code analyses
Fisher’s exact results for 7-digit ATC –
anomaly combinations
1.00e-10
1.00e-09
1.00e-08
1.00e-07
p
1.00e-06
.00001
P-value .0001
.001
.01
0.05
.05
.1
1
0.01
0.1 0.2
1
5 10
Observed
ORRatio
Observed
Odds
100
Multiple testing issues
P Values
Given there is no association - P = probability observed or more
extreme result would occur
P = 0.05 means that 5% of Fisher’s exact tests where there is no
association will be “statistically significant”
Ie 5% of 5,000 tests are likely to be false positives
False Discovery Rate:
Proportion of significant results that are expected to be false
positives
FDR of 5% means 5% of the “significant” results are likely to be
false positives
Ie 5% of significant results are likely to be false positives
False Discovery Rate
Density
Distribution of test
statistics if there are no
associations
B
Possible test results (Z-score)
False Discovery Rate
𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒
= 𝑩/𝑨
Distribution of test
statistics if there are no
associations
Density
FDR =
Observed distribution
of test statistics
A
B
Possible test results (Z-score)
False Discovery Rate
1.00e-10
1.00e-09
1.00e-08
1.00e-07
p
1.00e-06
.00001
FDR = 5%
.0001
P-value
.001
.01
0.05
.05
.1
0.05
1
0.01
0.1 0.2
1
5 10
Observed
OR
Observed Odds Ratio
100
False Discovery Rate
1.00e-10
May exclude
true
associations
1.00e-09
1.00e-08
1.00e-07
p
1.00e-06
.00001
FDR = 5%
.0001
P-value
.001
.01
0.05
.05
.1
0.05
1
0.01
0.1 0.2
1
5 10
Observed
OR
Observed Odds Ratio
100
False Discovery Rate
1.00e-10
May exclude
true
associations
1.00e-09
1.00e-08
1.00e-07
p
1.00e-06
.00001
FDR = 5%
.0001
P-value
FDR = 50%
.001
.01
0.05
.05
.1
1
0.01
0.1 0.2
1
5 10
Observed
OR
Observed Odds Ratio
100
False Discovery Rate
1.00e-10
May exclude
true
associations
1.00e-09
1.00e-08
1.00e-07
p
1.00e-06
.00001
FDR = 5%
.0001
P-value
FDR = 50%
.001
May include
.05 too many
false
associations
.01
0.05
.1
1
0.01
0.1 0.2
1
5 10
Observed
OR
Observed Odds Ratio
100
Flowchart of analyses
49,324 drug-CA combinations
19,529 5-digit drug combinations
(including aggregate drug groups)
29,795 7-digit drug combinations
Multiple testing procedure
(649 p-value < 0.05)
Multiple testing procedure
(886 p-value < 0.05)
97 potential signals at
(FDR= 0.5 ; p < 0.003)
31 potential signals at
(FDR = 0.5 ; p < 0.0005)
128 potential signals
Preliminary Results – Association tree
Example – Spina bifida and N03AG01 (valproic acid)
Congenital
Anomaly
Neural Tube
Defects
Spina Bifida
Exposure
Neural Tube
Defects
Spina Bifida
Odds Ratio
N03AG
Exposed
Cases
30
4.1 (2.6 - 6.0)
N03AG
29
7.4 (4.7 - 11.2)
N03AG01
29
4.0 (2.6 - 6.0)
N03AG01
28
7.3 (4.6 - 11.0)
Cases not yet verified by registry
Flowchart of analyses
49,324 drug-CA combinations
Exclusions
47,789 FDR > 0.5
128 potential signals
13 Less than 3 exposed cases
115 potential signals
20 5-digit ATC code of 7-digit ATC
associated with the same CA
6 Aggregate CA of a more specific
CA associated with the same
exposure
12 Protective associations
77 Independent signals
Subject to detailed follow-up
Validation of methodology
Spina bifida and valproic acid †
OR 7.25 (4.61-11.02)
28 Exposed cases
Congenital heart defects and human insulin †
OR 2.46 (1.81-3.35)
102 Exposed cases
† Cases not yet verified by registry
Future work
The WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre receives reports of
adverse drug reactions from all over the world.
66,000 reports of CA-related adverse drug reactions
since 2000
70% American/Canadian
Valuable independent dataset for testing signals