Transcript Macro_online_chapter_12_13ex

Macro Chapter 12
Fiscal Policy: Incentives, and
Secondary Effects
4 Learning Goals
1) Explain the crowding-out effect
2) Identify political incentives associated with
fiscal policy
3) Summarize both sides of the debate about the
effectiveness of fiscal stimulus
4) Investigate the effect fiscal policy has on
aggregate supply
Fiscal Policy, Borrowing,
and the Crowding-Out
Effect
Basic components of CrowdingOut:
Y=C+I+G+X
If the government (public sector) spends
more, G rises
Then businesses, consumers, and
foreigners (private sector) spend less, C, I,
and X fall
Net effect is zero or a small positive
increase in Y
First Secondary Effect:
When the gov’t spends more, it either
needs to borrow more or raise taxes to
fund that spending
If the gov’t borrows more, the demand for
loanable funds increases which increases
interest rates
When interest rates increase, consumers
buy less and businesses invest less
If the gov’t raises taxes, consumers and
businesses have less income which
causes C and I to fall
Second Secondary Effect:
If the gov’t borrows more, the demand for
loanable funds increases which increases
interest rates
Higher interest rates will attract foreign
investment which will cause the dollar to
appreciate (because the demand for the
dollar will increase)
When the dollar appreciates, US exports
fall and imports rise (net exports fall)
Q12.1 The crowding-out model implies that a
1. budget surplus will be highly effective against
inflation.
2. budget deficit is likely to stimulate aggregate
demand and cause inflation.
3. budget deficit will increase real interest rates
and, thereby, reduce private spending.
4. budget surplus will reduce aggregate demand
and throw the economy into a downward spiral.
Q12.2 The crowding-out model implies that
restrictive fiscal policy will
1. increase aggregate demand and employment.
2. lead to a significant increase in the natural rate
of unemployment.
3. be highly effective against inflation.
4. reduce real interest rates.
Fiscal Policy, Future
Taxes, and the New
Classical Model
Skim on your own
You are not expected to know details
Political Incentives and
the Effective Use of
Discretionary Fiscal
Policy
Another problem is the nature of
government spending:
Some spending may benefit only a small
group of people
Referred to as pork barrel spending
Watch video: Stossel Macro Clip 14- pork
barrel spending
Q12.3 Why is legislation such as that to build the
bridge in Ketchikan, Alaska, passed when most
everyone knows that it is “pork”?
1. The benefits are concentrated to constituents in a part of
Alaska while the costs are spread out over millions of
taxpayers.
2. The benefits are diffused to millions of taxpayers and the
costs are concentrated among special interest groups.
3. Such legislation will create permanent jobs and expand
the local economy.
4. When it comes to federal spending, members of Congress
often ignore the interests of their home districts.
Fiscal Policy:
Countercyclical versus
Response during a
Severe Recession
Will fiscal stimulus speed
recovery from a recession?
Argument for Yes:
Only some crowding-out will occur so
output will increase
The multiplier is large so an increase in G
will have a big effect
Interest rates are weak incentives
Will fiscal stimulus speed
recovery from a recession?
Argument for No:
More government spending now will lead
to higher interest rates and taxes later
Stimulus spending will increase structural
unemployment
Politically driven spending is inefficient
Let’s see, recovery.gov
Watch video about politically driven
spending: Stossel- stimulus spending and
crony capitalism
Are tax cuts a better tool than
government spending?
Argument for Yes:
Tax cuts work faster
Tax cuts are more efficient-you spend your
money better than someone else spending
it for you
Tax cuts are easier to reverse
Tax cuts increase the incentive to invest
and produce
Are tax cuts a better tool than
government spending?
Argument for No:
People will save their money rather than
spend it
Government spending can be directed to
certain areas; tax savings will go different
places
Government doesn’t want to give up that
revenue
How Much is a Trillion?
Inquiring minds want to know
What does one TRILLION dollars look like?
All this talk about “stimulus packages” and “bailouts”...
A billion dollars...
A hundred billion dollars...
Eight hundred billion dollars...
One TRILLION dollars...
What does that look like?
Here’s a hundred bucks
We’ll start with a $100 dollar bill. Currently the largest
U.S. denomination in general circulation. Most everyone
has seen them, slightly fewer have owned them.
Guaranteed to make friends wherever they go.
Serious coin
A packet of one hundred $100 bills is less than 1/2" thick
and contains $10,000. Fits in your pocket easily and is
more than enough for a week or two of shamefully
decadent fun.
One Million Dollars!!!
Believe it or not, this next little pile is $1 million dollars
(100 packets of $10,000). You could stuff that into a
grocery bag and walk around with it.
That’s what I’m talkin’ about!
While a measly $1 million looked a little unimpressive,
$100 million is a little more respectable. It fits neatly on a
standard pallet...
Holy cow!
And $1 BILLION dollars... now we’re really getting
somewhere...
Please have a seat
Next we’ll look at ONE TRILLION dollars. This is that
number we’ve been hearing so much about.
What is a trillion dollars? Well, it’s a million million.
It’s a thousand billion.
It’s a one followed by 12 zeros.
You ready for this?
$1 Trillion dollars:
And notice those pallets are double stacked $100 dollar bills!
So the next time you hear your Congressman toss around the phrase
“trillion dollars”... that’s what they’re talking about.
Q 12.4 Historically, Keynesian economists have
argued that government spending will stimulate
aggregate demand more than tax cuts because
1. government spending will stimulate aggregate demand
more quickly than a tax cut.
2. there are fewer adverse side effects to an increase in
government spending.
3. all of the spending will add to aggregate demand, but a
portion of the tax cut will be saved.
4. an increase in government spending can quickly be
reversed once the economy has recovered.
Q12.5 According to non-Keynesians, how will an
increase in government spending financed by
borrowing during a recession affect recovery?
1. Higher future taxes and interest rates will be required to
finance the larger debt and this will weaken the recovery.
2. Repayment of the debt can always be shifted to the future,
making it possible to keep tax rates low and thereby
strengthen the recovery.
3. Higher interest payments will increase future government
spending, and thereby promote a stronger the recovery.
4. The increase in government spending will exert a multiplier
effect on the economy, leading to a stronger recovery.
Paradoxes of Thrift and
Spending
Skim on your own
The Supply-Side Effects
of Fiscal Policy
Class Activity : Make up an annual income for
yourself. What is your marginal tax rate? How
does that differ from your average tax rate?
Some other details of tax payments
Watch video: Stossel Macro Clip 06- how
much taxes do the rich pay
See Mankiw- “I can afford higher taxes”
article in Blackboard
Q12.6 If the government cuts the tax rate, workers
get to keep
1. less of each additional dollar they earn, so work effort
increases, and aggregate supply shifts right.
2. less of each additional dollar they earn, so work effort
decreases, and aggregate supply shifts left.
3. more of each additional dollar they earn, so work effort
increases, and aggregate supply shifts right.
4. more of each additional dollar they earn, so work effort
decreases, and aggregate supply shifts left.
Fiscal Policy of the
United States
Here is a brief history of how we
arrived at our thinking today
See (again) Supplemental Videos:
Commanding Heights 1, Chapters 1
through 8
For more information, see
www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights
Or Google “commanding heights”
Question Answers:
12.1 = 3
12.2 = 4
12.3 = 1
12.4 = 3
12.5 = 1
12.6 = 3