FDI - CLAS Users
Download
Report
Transcript FDI - CLAS Users
FDI, Export-led
industrialization and the private
market
African Economic Development
Renata Serra – March 1st 2007
Why may FDI be so important?
Role of export-led industrialization
Lack of domestic saving and capital
FDI accelerates technology import
Possible impacts on employment and poverty
FDI – trends
FDI increased a lot on a global level but only
marginally to SSA
Dramatic decline in relative FDI to Africa
FDI share decline reflects declining shares in
world output, trade, investment and incomes
Low FDI means increasing debt
FDI and policies
Attempts to attract FDI included:
1985-92: liberalization and privatization
1992-on: transparency, accountability, credibility
Why has FDI largely eschewed SSA?
Risk perception and poor investment climate
Poor infrastructures
Inadequate policies (trade and macro)
Weak governance
Nature of FDI to Africa
High concentration
¾ of FDI goes to oil- and mineral-rich economies
High concentration of FDI in 5-10 countries
Most FDI comes from UK, France and US
Enclave sectors:
Exceptions are Mauritius, Morocco and Uganda
Country’s GDP higher than its GNP
High ratio of export earnings to value added
“Footlose”: increased importance of M&A
over greenfield investment
Possible cons of FDI
Enclave sectors
Capital intensive
More volatile than manufacture
Footloose investment does not benefit local
economies
Limited positive spillovers
Bargaining power is in foreign company’s hands
Conflicts between governments’ and TNCs’ goals
Environmental and other costs are to be considered
Why is FDI to Africa low?
Abundant natural resource by itself will not do
Many point the finger to weak governance, yet:
Business environment is improving
High rates of EPZs creation
Low inflation and low corporate taxes
Are TNCs really after good governance?
More likely obstacles:
Low education, skills, and know-how
Lack of “technological effort” and absorptive capacity
Low K accumulation and economic structural changes