MacroChap008
Download
Report
Transcript MacroChap008
Chapter 8:
The Goods Market
and the Aggregate
Expenditures Model
Prepared by:
Kevin Richter, Douglas College
Charlene Richter,
British Columbia Institute of Technology
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
1
The Historical Development of
Modern Macroeconomics
The Great Depression of the 1930s led to the
development of macroeconomics and
aggregate demand tools to deal with
recessions.
During the Depression, output fell by 30
percent and unemployment rose to 25
percent.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
2
The Historical Development of
Modern Macroeconomics
Keynes is the author of The General Theory
of Employment, Interest and Money, which
provided the new framework for
macroeconomic policy.
Keynes is pronounced “canes”
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
3
Classical Economists
The Classical economists' approach was
laissez-faire (leave the market alone).
They believed the market was self-adjusting.
They concentrated on the long run and
largely ignored the short run.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
4
Classical Economics
They used microeconomic supply and
demand arguments to explain the Great
Depression.
Their solution to the high unemployment was
to eliminate labour unions and government
policies that kept wages too high.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
5
The Historical Development of
Modern Macroeconomics
Before the Depression, the prominent
ideology was laissez-faire -- keep the
government out of the economy.
After the Depression, most people believed
government should have a role in regulating
the economy.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
6
The Layperson's Explanation for
Unemployment
Laypeople believed that the depression was
caused by an oversupply of goods that
glutted the market.
They wanted the government to hire the
unemployed even if the work was not
needed.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
7
The Layperson's Explanation for
Unemployment
Classical economists opposed deficit
spending, arguing that the money to create
jobs had to be borrowed.
This money would have financed private
economic activity and jobs, so everything
would cancel out.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
8
The Essence of Keynesian Economics
Keynes thought that the economy could get
stuck in a rut as wages and price level
adjusted to sudden decreases in
expenditures.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
9
The Essence of Keynesian Economics
According to Keynes:
a decrease in spending
job layoffs
fall in consumer demand
firms decrease production
more job layoffs
further fall in consumer demand,
and so forth
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
10
Equilibrium Income Fluctuates
Income is not fixed at the economy's long-run
potential income – it fluctuates.
For Keynes there was a difference between
equilibrium income and potential income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
11
Equilibrium Income Fluctuates
Equilibrium income – the level toward which
the economy gravitates in the short run
because of the cumulative cycles of declining
or increasing production.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
12
Equilibrium Income Fluctuates
Potential income – the level of income that
the economy technically is capable of
producing without generating accelerating
inflation.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
13
Equilibrium Income Fluctuates
Keynes felt that at certain times the economy
needed help to reach its potential income.
He believed that market forces would not
work fast enough and would not be strong
enough to get the economy out of a
recession
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
14
Equilibrium Income Fluctuates
Because short-run aggregate production
decisions and expenditure decisions were
interdependent, the downward spiral could
start at any time.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
15
The Paradox of Thrift
Incomes would fall as people lost their jobs
causing both consumption and saving to fall
as well.
The economy would reach a new equilibrium
which could be at an almost permanent
recession.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
16
The Paradox of Thrift
Paradox of thrift – an increase in savings
can lead to a decrease in expenditures,
decreasing output and causing a recession.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
17
The Aggregate Expenditures Model
Using a few simplifying assumptions,
economists can construct a model of the
economy.
The Aggregate Expenditures (AE) Model
looks at how real income is determined in an
economy.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
18
The Aggregate Expenditures Model
The AE model assumes that the price level is
fixed, and explores how an initial shift in
expenditures changes equilibrium output.
The AE model quantifies the effect of
changes in aggregate expenditures on
aggregate output.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
19
Aggregate Production
Aggregate production –the total amount of
goods and services produced in every
industry in an economy.
Production creates an equal amount of
income.
Thus, actual production and actual income
are always equal.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
20
Aggregate Production
Graphically, aggregate production in the AE
model is represented by a 45° line through
the origin
At all points on this Aggregate Production
Curve, income equals production.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
21
The Aggregate Production Curve
Real
production
C
A
$4,000
Potential income
45º
0
Aggregate production
(production = income)
$4,000
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
Real income
22
Aggregate Expenditures
Aggregate expenditures – the total amount
of spending on final goods and services in
the economy:
Consumption – spending by households.
Investment – spending by business.
Spending by government.
Net foreign spending on Canadian goods – the
difference between Canadian exports and
imports.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
23
Autonomous and Induced
Expenditures
Autonomous expenditures are
expenditures that are independent of income.
Autonomous expenditures change because
something other than income changes.
Induced expenditures – expenditures that
change as income changes.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
24
Autonomous and Induced
Expenditures
Autonomous expenditures is the level of
expenditures that would exist at zero income.
They remain constant at all levels of income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
25
Autonomous and Induced
Expenditures
Induced expenditures are those that
change as income changes.
When income rises, induced expenditures
rise by less than the change in income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
26
Expenditures Function
The relationship between expenditures and
income can be expressed more concisely as
an expenditures function.
An expenditures function is a
representation of the relationship between
aggregate expenditures and income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
27
The Expenditures Function
The relationship between aggregate
expenditures and income can be expressed
mathematically:
AE = AEo + mpcY
AE = aggregate expenditures
AEo = autonomous expenditures
mpc = marginal propensity to consume
Y = income
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
28
The Marginal Propensity to Consume
Marginal propensity to consume (mpc) –
the change in consumption that occurs with a
change in income.
The mpc is between 0 and 1 because
individuals tend to save a portion of an
increase in income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
29
The Marginal Propensity to Consume
The mpc is the fraction spent from an
additional dollar of income.
change in consumption C
mpc
change in income
Y
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
30
The Marginal Propensity to Consume
The marginal propensity to consume
(mpc) is the ratio of a change in consumption
(C) to a change in income ( Y).
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
31
Expenditures Function
Autonomous expenditures is the sum of the
autonomous components of expenditures:
AE = C + I + G + X – IM
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
32
Graphing the Expenditures Function
The graphical representation of the
expenditures function is called the aggregate
expenditures curve.
The slope of the expenditures function tells
us how much expenditures change with a
particular change in income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
33
Graphing the Expenditures Function
Aggregate production
AE = 1,000 + 0.8Y
Real expenditures (AE)
$12,200
10,000
AE = 2,000
8,000
Y = 2,500
6,000
5,000
4,000
2,000
1,000
0
AE 2,000
Y
2,500
AE
mpc
0.8
Y
slope
45º
$5,000
$8,750 $11,250$14,000
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
Real income
34
Shifts in the Expenditures Function
The aggregate expenditure curve shifts when
autonomous C, I, G, or (X – IM) change.
Autonomous Consumption expenditures
respond to changes in:
interest rates
household wealth
expectations of future conditions
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
35
Shifts in the Expenditures Function
Autonomous Investment is the most volatile
component of GDP.
It responds to changes in:
interest rates
capital goods prices
consumer demand conditions
expectations regarding future economic conditions
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
36
Shifts in the Expenditures Function
Autonomous exports and imports depend on
foreign and domestic incomes and relative
prices.
Autonomous Government expenditures may
also change as policies change.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
37
Determining the Equilibrium Level of
Aggregate Income
At equilibrium, planned expenditures must
equal production.
Graphically, it is the income level at which AE
equals AP.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
38
Solving for Equilibrium Graphically
Aggregate
production
Real expenditures (AE)
$14,000
Aggregate
expenditures
AE = 1,000 + 0.8Y
12,200
10,000
8,000
E
5,000
2,600
1,000
0
45°
$2,000
AE0 = $1,000
$5,000
$10,000
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
$14,000
Real income
39
Solving for Equilibrium Algebraically
In equilibrium, Y = AE.
Substituting in for aggregate expenditures,
we have
Y = AE0 + mpcY
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
40
Solving for Equilibrium Algebraically
Now solve for equilibrium income:
Y – mpcY = AE0
Y (1 – mpc) = AE0
Y = [ 1/ (1 – mpc) ] * AE0
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
41
The Multiplier Equation
The multiplier equation tells us that income
equals the multiplier times autonomous
expenditures.
Y = Multiplier X Autonomous expenditures
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
42
The Multiplier Equation
The multiplier process amplifies changes in
autonomous expenditures.
What forces are operating to ensure that the
income level we determined is actually the
equilibrium income level?
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
43
The Multiplier Process
When aggregate production do not equal
aggregate expenditures:
Businesses change production levels,
which changes income,
which changes expenditures,
which changes production,
which changes income,
which changes . . . etc.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
44
The Multiplier Process
The process ends when aggregate
production equals aggregate expenditures.
Firms are selling all they produce, so they
have no reason to change their production
levels.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
45
The Multiplier Process
Real expenditures (AE)
C, I, G,
(X – IM)
A1 Aggregate
production
Aggregate
A2 expenditures
AE = 1,000 + 0.8Y
$14,000
$13,200
10,000
C
B1
6,000
B2
2,000
0
45°
$2,000
$5,000
$10,000
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
$14,000
Real income
46
The Circular Flow Model and the
Multiplier Process
The circular flow model provides the intuition
behind the multiplier process.
The flow of expenditures equals the flow of
income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
47
The Circular Flow Model and the
Multiplier Process
Expenditures are injections into the circular
flow.
The mpc measures the percentage of
expenditures that get injected back into the
economy each round of the circular flow.
But there are withdrawals.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
48
The Circular Flow Model and the
Multiplier Process
Economists use the term the marginal
propensity of save (mps) to represent the
percentage of income flow that is withdrawn
from the economy for each round of the
circular flow.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
49
The Circular Flow Model and the
Multiplier Process
By definition:
mpc + mps = 1
Alternatively expressed:
mps = 1 - mpc
multiplier = 1/mps
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
50
The Circular Flow Model and the
Multiplier Process
Aggregate income
Households
Firms
Aggregate expenditures
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
51
The AE Model in Action
The AE model illustrates how a change in
autonomous expenditures changes the
equilibrium level of income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
52
The Multiplier Model in Action
Autonomous expenditures are determined
outside the model and are not affected by
changes in income.
When autonomous expenditures shift, the
multiplier process is called into play.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
53
The Steps of the Multiplier Process
The income adjustment process is directly
related to the multiplier.
Any initial shock (a change in autonomous
AE) is multiplied in the adjustment process.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
54
The Steps of the Multiplier Process
The multiplier process repeats and repeats
until a new equilibrium level is finally reached.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
55
Shifts in the Aggregate Expenditure
Curve
C, I
Aggregate production
$4,200
E0
4,160
20
AE0 = 832 + .8Y
AE1 = 812 + .8Y
832
812
0
$20
12.8
20
D AEA = $20
D AEA = $16
D AEA = $12.8
$16
4,100
4,060
E0
E1
$100
$4,060
E1
$4,160 Real income
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
100
56
First Five Steps of Four Multipliers
mpc = 0.5
mpc = 0.75
100
100
75
56.25
50
42.19
31.64
25
12.5 6.25
Multiplier = 1/(1-0.5) = 2
Multiplier = 1/(1-0.75) = 4
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
57
First Five Steps of Four Multipliers
mpc = 0.8
mpc = 0.9
100
100
80
64
90
81
72.9
65.61
51.2
40.96
Multiplier = 1/(1-0.8) = 5
Multiplier = 1/(1-0.9) = 10
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
58
Examples of the Effect of Shifts in
Aggregate Expenditures
There are many reasons for shifts in
autonomous expenditures:
Natural disasters.
Changes in investment caused by technological
developments.
Shifts in government expenditures.
Large changes in the exchange rate.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
59
The Effect of Shifts in Aggregate
Expenditures
An understanding of these shifts can be
enhanced by tying them to the formula:
AE = C + I + G + X - IM
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
60
Upward Shift of AE
Real
expenditures
$4,210
Aggregate production
AE1
30
AE0
Y
4,090
1,052.5
4 AE0 120
30
1,022.5
0
1
AE0
1 - 0.75
$120
$4,090
$4,210
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
Real income
61
Downward Shift of AE
Real
expenditures
$4,152
Aggregate production
AE0
30 AE1
Y
4,062
1,412
3 AE0 90
30
1,382
0
1
AE0
1 - 0.66
$90
$4,062
$4,152
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
Real income
62
Real World Examples
Canada in 2000.
Japan in the 1990s.
The 1930s depression.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
63
Canada in 2000
Consumer confidence rose substantially
causing autonomous consumption
expenditures to increase more than
economists had predicted.
While economists had expected the economy
to grow slowly, it boomed.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
64
Japan in the 1990s
Aggregate income and production fell during
the 1990s.
A dramatic rise in the yen cut Japanese exports.
Autonomous consumption decreased as
consumers’ confidence fell
Suppliers responded by laying off workers and
cutting production.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
65
The 1930s Depression
The 1929 stock market crash, which
continued into 1930, threw the financial
markets into chaos.
This resulted in a downward shift of the AE
curve.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
66
The 1930s Depression
Frightened business people decreased
investment and laid off workers.
Frightened consumers decreased
autonomous consumption and increased
savings, thereby increasing withdrawals from
the system.
Governments cut spending to balance their
budgets, as tax revenue declined.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
67
The 1930s Depression
Business people responded by decreasing
output, which decreased income, starting a
downward cycle, thereby confirming the
fears of the businesspeople.
The process continued until the economy
settled at a low-level equilibrium, far below
the potential level of income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
68
The 1930s Depression
The process caused the paradox of thrift,
whereby individuals attempting to save more,
spent less, and caused income to decrease.
They ended up saving not more, but less.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
69
AE Model Is Not a Complete Model
The AE model determines income given
autonomous expenditures.
These autonomous expenditures, however,
are determined by economic variables which
are not in our simple model.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
70
AE Model Is Not a Complete Model
The AE model uses aggregate expenditures
to determine equilibrium income.
It does not explain production.
It assumes firms can supply the output
demanded.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
71
Model of Aggregate Demand
Shifts may be simultaneous shifts in supply
and demand that do not necessarily reflect
suppliers responding to changes in demand.
Expansion of this line of thought has led to
the real business cycle theory of the
economy.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
72
Model of Aggregate Demand
Real business cycle theory of the
economy – changes in aggregate supply are
the principle way for real income to change.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
73
Prices are Fixed
The multiplier model assumes that the price
level is fixed.
The price level can change in response to
changes in aggregate demand.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
74
Does Not Include Expectations
People's forward-looking expectations make
the adjustment process much more
complicated.
Most people, however, act upon their
expectations of the future.
Business people may not automatically cut
back production and lay-off workers if they
think a fall in sales is temporary.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
75
Forward-Looking Expectations
Complicate the Adjustment Process
Rational expectations model – captures the
effect expectations have on individuals’
behaviour.
Expectations can be self-fulfilling.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
76
Consumption Behaviour
People may base their spending on lifetime
income, not yearly income.
Permanent income hypothesis -- the
hypothesis that expenditures are determined
by permanent or lifetime income.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
77
Expanded AE Model
We can increase the power of our AE model
by adding more detail.
For example, adding taxes to the model
Changes consumption expenditures.
Introduces government budget deficits and
surpluses.
Changes the multiplier.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
78
Budget Surplus Function
Budget Surplus
T-G
0
Income
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
79
Expanded AE Model
Adding income-induced imports
Changes import spending.
Changes net exports,
and introduces trade surpluses and deficits.
Changes the multiplier.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
80
Expanded AE Model
The marginal propensity to import (mpi) gives
the increase in import spending from an
additional $1 of disposable income.
Disposable = after-tax
Mpi lies between 0 and 1
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
81
The Goods Market and the
Aggregate Expenditures Model
End of Chapter 8
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All
rights reserved.
82