Key Issues in Fiscal Policy
Download
Report
Transcript Key Issues in Fiscal Policy
Thorvaldur Gylfason
International Monetary Fund/Asian Development Bank
Course on Financial Programming and Policies
Seoul, Korea, 17-28 May 2010
1. Objectives of fiscal policy
Stabilization, allocation, distribution
2. Global financial crisis and fiscal
policy response
Benefits associated with fiscal policy
3. Risks associated with fiscal policy
Public debt dynamics
Sustainability of public debt
Safeguarding fiscal sustainability
1. The term fiscal policy refers to the use
of public finance instruments to
influence the working of the economic
system to maximize economic welfare
2. Effects of fiscal policy reflect not only
the impact of the fiscal balance, but
also various elements of taxation,
spending, and budget financing
3. Assessing the stance of fiscal policy
requires taking account of the activities
of all levels of government
1. Stabilization
Fiscal policy influences aggregate demand
Directly because Y = C + I + G + X – Z
Indirectly because C depends on income after tax
Through demand, fiscal policy affects output,
employment, inflation, balance of payments
2. Allocation
Fiscal policy also influences aggregate supply
Public
infrastructure, education, health care
3. Distribution
Through taxes, transfers, and expenditures
Progressive,
neutral, regressive
Fiscal policy can be used to several ends
To achieve internal balance
To promote external balance
By ensuring sustainable current account balance
By reducing risk of external crisis
To promote economic growth
By adjusting aggregate demand to available supply
By achieving low inflation, potential output
E.g., through more and better education and health care
Fiscal policy needs to be coordinated with
monetary, exchange rate, and structural –
i.e., supply-side – policies
Demand management
E.g., lower income taxes
Price level
Aggregate supply
in short run
B
A
Aggregate
demand
Output
Demand management
Supply management
E.g., lower income taxes
E.g., lower import tariffs
Price level
Price level
Aggregate supply
in short run
B
Aggregate supply
in short run
A
A
Aggregate
demand
Output
B
Aggregate
demand
Output
National income accounts
Y=C+I+G+X–Z
S = Y – T – C = I + G – T + X – Z, so
G–T=S–I+Z–X
Y = GDP
C = Consumption
I = Investment
G = Government expenditure
(plus lending minus repayments)
T = Taxes (plus grants)
X = Exports
Z = Imports
B = Government bonds outstanding
DG = Credit from banking system
DF = Credit from foreigners
Government budget deficit must be financed either by
(a) having private saving in excess of private investment
or (b) by accumulating foreign debt through a deficit in
the current account of the balance of payments, or both
Alternative formulation
G – T = B + DG + DF
Government budget deficit must be financed by
borrowing either at home or abroad, i.e., from (a) the
public, (b) the banking system, or (c) foreigners
Central
Inflation tax: Most inflationary form of financing
Bond
bank financing involves money creation
finance is less inflationary
Removes financial resources from circulation
Increases real interest rates
Crowds out private investment
External
Especially if it leads to currency depreciation
Evidence
financing can be inflationary
from cross-country data
Strong links between budget deficits and inflation in
developing countries, but not in industrial countries
Bond finance is the rule in industrial countries …
… and money finance is the exception
Conventional budget surplus
T–G
Large in upswings when tax base (Y) is strong
Small in downswings when tax base is weak
Full-employment surplus
TFE – G
Use tax revenue as it would be
at full employment
Independent of business cycles
A budget in deficit could be in
surplus with full employment
Deficit can be consistent with
a tight fiscal stance (see chart)
T, G
T
G
Y < YFE
YFE
Y
Public sector borrowing requirement
Broad measure of public sector deficit, including
central, state, and local government
Primary budget balance
Leaves out interest payments
Conventional deficit = G – T = GN + GI – T = GN + iDG - T
Primary deficit = GN – T = G – T – iDG
GN = Noninterest expenditure
GI = Interest expenditure
i = Nominal interest rate
DG = Government debt outstanding
Operational deficit
Leaves out inflation component of interest payments
Operational deficit = conventional deficit minus inflation
component of interest payments = primary deficit plus
real component of interest payments
GN = Noninterest expenditure
Conventional deficit:
GI = Interest expenditure
N
G
N
G
G – T = G + iD – T = G + (r + p)D – T
r = Real interest rate
DG = Government debt
Operational deficit:
p = Inflation rate
G – T - pDG = GN – T + rDG
Hence, operational deficit includes only real part of
interest payments, leaves out the inflation part
Before Great Depression 1929-39, many
thought that governments needed to
balance their budgets from year to year
Even so, US had built is railways through
borrowing, for example
Keynes revolted (General Theory 1936)
If private sector failed to consume and invest,
government could fill the gap
Y = C + I + G + X – Z
C and I and G appear side by side
Guns or butter? Makes no difference
Also, could reduce taxes to encourage C and I
Multiplier analysis
It could be shown that, with unemployed
resources, an increase in G would raise Y by an
amount greater than the original increase in G
Active fiscal policy was used consciously
in Sweden even before Keynes …
… and adopted in US and elsewhere after
1960 (Kennedy-Johnson administration)
Coincided with buildup of US as a welfare state
with greater emphasis on public services and
social security, like in Europe
Active fiscal policy came naturally to Europe
Fiscal policy can affect
Aggregate demand, output, and price level
Cut taxes: Consumption, output, and prices rise
Rate of monetary expansion and inflation
Increase spending financed by credit expansion:
Money expands (M = D + R), so inflation goes up
Aggregate supply and economic growth
Boost education and health care: Efficiency and
long-run growth go up
Current account of balance of payments
Raise taxes: Disposable income and imports fall, so
current account improves unless currency appreciates
Fiscal multipliers are positive, but small
Impact of fiscal policy actions depends on
Whether economy is open or closed (import leakage)
Exchange rate regime (fixed or floating)
Type of budget financing (money creation or debt)
Degree of confidence in economic policy
Level of government debt
Financing constraints
Risk premia on debt
Whether fiscal changes are considered temporary or
permanent
How close the economy is to full employment
(-)
Gov’t Budget
Balance
(+)
RE
(+)
(-)
Tax
revenue
(-)
Consumption
(+)
(+)
Expenditure
(+)
Income
(+)
Fiscal Policy
(-)
(+)
Interest Rate
(-)
Investment
(+)
(+)
Capital
Labor
Monetary
policy has been used heavily
Its further impact may be limited
In
many countries, policy interest rates
already approach zero
Monetary policy may have limited effect
during “balance sheet recessions,” when
many firms are technically bankrupt, will
use increased earnings to restore capital,
and may not respond to lower interest
rates
Koo (2009), Holy Grail of Macroeconomics: Lessons from
Japan’s Great Recession
Mixed
evidence on efficacy of fiscal
policy in developing countries
While automatic stabilizing impulses
are weak and make the case for
discretion, there is also the widely
noted occurrence of pro-cyclicality
The
focus of stimulus packages
differ between advanced and
developing countries
Infrastructure spending 46% of fiscal
stimulus in developing economies,
but 15% in advanced economies
Tax cuts over 34% of fiscal stimulus
in advanced economies, only 3% in
developing economies
Khatiwada, S. (2009), “Stimulus Packages to Counter
Global Economic Crisis; A Review,” International Institute
for Labour Studies Discussion Paper 196.
No
clear consensus among economists about
the size of fiscal multipliers (response of
real GDP to tax cuts or higher spending)
Recent IMF Staff Position Note reports:
A rule of thumb is a multiplier (using the definition ΔY/ΔG and
assuming a constant interest rate) of 1.5 to 1 for spending
multipliers in large countries, 1 to 0.5 for medium sized countries,
and 0.5 or less for small open countries.
Smaller multipliers (about half of the above values) are likely for
revenue and transfers while slightly larger multipliers might be
expected from investment spending.
Negative multipliers are possible, especially if the fiscal stimulus
weakens (or is perceived to weaken) fiscal sustainability.
Source: Spilimbergo, Symansky, and Schindler (2009), “Fiscal
Multipliers,” IMF Staff Position Note spn/09/11.
Countries
Japan
China
S. Korea
Singapore
Malaysia
Thailand*
Indonesia
Philippines
Vietnam*
Cambodia
Amount in
US$ (billion)
As a % GDP
Fiscal balance 2009
(% of GDP, est.)
774
586
86
13.8
18.1
3.3
6.1
6.5
17.6
0
16.4
14
12.8
10.7
10
1.2
1.2
4.6
22
0
-6.8
-3.1
-2.1
-3.5
-7.4
-4.0
-2.6
-3.2
-7.0
-3.2
*Financing of Vietnam and Thailand’s second stimulus packages have been
excluded as financing is yet to be finalized.
Countries
China
Hong Kong
Indonesia
Japan
Korea
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam
Debt (% of GDP)
16
14
30
170
33
43
56
114
42
39
Source: ADB.
23
Solvency
Satisfying solvency condition
Liquidity
Ability to meet maturing obligations
Sustainability
Solvency + liquidity + no expectation of
unrealistically large adjustment
Vulnerability
Risk of insolvency or illiquidity
Monetary survey
M
=R+D
D = DG + DP
M = Money supply
R = Reserves (NFA)
D = Domestic credit (NDA)
DG = Domestic credit to government
DP = Domestic credit to private sector
Fiscal policy determines government’s demand
for bank financing (DG), which, in turn, affects
total domestic credit (D), i.e., net domestic
assets (ignoring other items net), and money (M)
Increased
budget financing requires
greater monetary expansion unless credit
to private sector (DP) is cut or foreign
reserves (R) go down, reflecting weaker
balance of payments position
In times of financial and economic
crisis, fiscal policy plays key role in
government’s response
Fiscal
policy played a role during Great
Depression, even if theory behind it was
poorly understood, or even disputed
Fiscal policy plays key role in current crisis
Monetary policy is ineffective if real interest
rates cannot be reduced without igniting
inflation
Fiscal policy is more effective
Massive fiscal stimulus in US, Europe, and Asia: it works!
Fiscal stimulus is assisted by automatic stabilizers
Fiscal stimulus packages need to
include an exit strategy to ensure that
solvency is not at risk, and should
Not have permanent effects on budget deficits
Provide a commitment to fiscal correction, once
economic conditions improve
Include structural reforms to enhance growth
Should firmly commit to clear strategies for health
care and pension reforms in countries facing
demographic pressures
Need for financing tends to lift
interest rates, so capital flows in and
currency tends to appreciate
Central Bank must offset incipient
appreciation by expanding money
supply, thereby reinforcing initial
fiscal stimulus
Otherwise, exchange rate could not
remain fixed
Need for financing tends to lift
interest rates, so capital flows in and
currency appreciates
Appreciation reduces net exports,
aggregate demand, and interest rates
Process continues until interest rates
fall to their initial level
So, fiscal stimulus is ineffective
with perfect capital mobility
In times of large deficits and growing
public debt, public spending can
have weak or even negative effects
By
creating expectations of a fiscal crisis,
and hence of higher future taxes
Increased saving may lead to a sharp fall
in consumption
Hence, fiscal stimulus can fail, and may
even prove counterproductive
Conversely, fiscal contraction may prove
expansionary
Fiscal policy is frequently key to
addressing balance of payments
problems
Simple mechanism
M
= R + D means
R = M – D = M – DG – DP
Hence, given M and DP, key to raising
R is reducing DG
IMF: It’s Mostly Fiscal!
Or look at it this way:
Y = C + I + G + X – Z means
X–Z=Y–C–T–I–G+T=S–I+T-G
Hence, current account balance (X – Z)
equals sum of private sector surplus of
saving over investment (S – I) and
government surplus of taxes over public
expenditure (T – G)
Equivalently, Z – X = I – S + G – T means that
external deficit equals sum of private sector
deficit and government budget deficit
Unsustainable fiscal policy can trigger a
crisis if public loses confidence in
government’s macroeconomic policy
Sudden capital outflow can result, weakening
balance of payments and leading to a sharp
devaluation
Financing the budget externally builds up
external debt, increasing risk of crisis
Fiscal sustainability thus matters not only for
debt, but also for balance of payments
Fiscal contraction (spending cuts, tax
increases) can slow down inflation,
reduce current account deficit
Fiscal expansion (tax cuts, spending
increases) can shrink unemployment,
increase aggregate demand and help
restore output to full capacity, i.e.,
bring actual GDP up to potential GDP,
especially if monetary policy is
impotent
Automatic, or built-in, stabilizers are
revenue or expenditure provisions that
have counter-cyclical impact without
need for policy intervention
Protect against shocks
Dampen business cycles
Examples
Progressive taxes on income, profits
Price stabilization funds
Unemployment insurance
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
2003
1999
1995
1991
1987
1983
1979
1975
1971
1967
1963
1959
1955
1951
1947
1943
1939
1935
1931
1927
1923
1919
1915
1911
1907
1903
1899
1895
1891
1887
1883
1879
1875
1871
Change in Canada’s per capita GDP from year to year 1871-2003 (%)
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
2003
1999
1995
1991
1987
1983
1979
1975
1971
1967
1963
1959
1955
1951
1947
1943
1939
1935
1931
1927
1923
1919
1915
1911
1907
1903
1899
1895
1891
1887
1883
1879
1875
1871
Change in US per capita GDP from year to year 1871-2003 (%)
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
1831
1835
1839
1843
1847
1851
1855
1859
1863
1867
1871
1875
1879
1883
1887
1891
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003
Change in UK per capita GDP from year to year 1871-2003 (%)
15
10
5
0
-10
-20
1821
1826
1831
1836
1841
1846
1851
1856
1861
1866
1871
1876
1881
1886
1891
1896
1901
1906
1911
1916
1921
1926
1931
1936
1941
1946
1951
1956
1961
1966
1971
1976
1981
1986
1991
1996
2001
Change in French per capita GDP from year to year 1821-2003 (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
1851
1855
1859
1863
1867
1871
1875
1879
1883
1887
1891
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003
Change in German per capita GDP from year to year 1851-2003 (%)
20
10
0
1821
1826
1831
1836
1841
1846
1851
1856
1861
1866
1871
1876
1881
1886
1891
1896
1901
1906
1911
1916
1921
1926
1931
1936
1941
1946
1951
1956
1961
1966
1971
1976
1981
1986
1991
1996
2001
Change in Swedish per capita GDP from year to year 1821-2003 (%)
10
5
-5
-10
-15
Source: Maddison (2003).
Objections to fiscal activism
Borrowing to finance increased government
expenditures raises interest rates, thereby
crowding out investment and reducing multiplier
At full employment, increased public spending,
however financed, leads to inflation without
stimulating output except temporarily
Increasing spending or cutting taxes to combat
unemployment may impart inflation bias to
economic system
Rules vs. discretion
Long lags, including approval and implementation
Fiscal activism may tend to expand public sector
Government has vital role to play in
modern mixed economies (allocation role)
Education
Health care, cf. current debate in United States
Infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.)
Some would also stress government’s
distribution role …
… claiming that the government should try to
secure reasonable equality in the distribution of
income and wealth, including poverty alleviation
Normative or positive economics?
Partly positive: Equality is good for growth
views
Inequality sharpens
incentives and thus
helps growth
Inequality
endangers social
cohesion and hurts
growth
117 countries,
1960-2000
Per capita growth adjusted for intial income (%)
Two
r = -0.27
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
10
20
30
40
50
60
Gini index of inequality
70
is good for
growth
No visible sign here
that equality stands
in the way of
economic growth
An increase in Gini
index by 16 points
goes along with a
decrease in per
capita growth by
one percentage
point per year
Per capita growth adjusted for intial income (%)
Equality
r = -0.27
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
10
20
30
40
50
60
Gini index of inequality
70
Why not raise government expenditure
on public services or whatever and
reduce taxes? – to buy votes
Supposing all objections could be swept aside
Because this would create a deficit and
deficits can lead to inflation, and inflation is
undesirable for many reasons – it reduces
efficiency and growth, for one thing
Even so, a modest deficit can be sustained in
a growing economy
So how modest is modest?
Debt
accumulation is, by its nature,
a dynamic phenomenon
A
large stock of debt involves high
interest payments which, in turn, add
to the deficit, which calls for further
borrowing, and so on
o
Debt accumulation can develop into a
vicious circle
How
do we know whether a given debt
strategy will spin out of control or not?
o
To answer this, we need a little arithmetic
Revenues
Expenditures
Budget Deficit
Financing
Increase in debt
Higher interest payments
Recall
operational budget deficit:
G – T = B + DG + DF = D = GN + rD - T
where D is total government credit outstanding
Further,
assume for simplicity
T = GN
Then,
we have
D = rD
ΔD
r
This gives
D
So, now we have:
ΔD
r
D
Now subtract growth rate of output from
both sides:
ΔD ΔY
r-g
D
Y
Y
g
Y
But what is
ΔD ΔY
D
Y
?
This is proportional change in debt ratio:
D
Δ
ΔD ΔY
Y
D
D
Y
Y
This is an application of a
simple rule of arithmetic:
%(x/y) = %x - %y
z = x/y
log(z) = log(x) – log(y)
log(z) = log(x) - log(y)
But what is log(z) ?
dlog(z) dz 1 Δz
Δlog(z)
dt
dt z
z
So, we obtain
Δz Δx Δy
z
x
y
Q.E.D.
We have shown that
Δd
rg
d
where
D
d
Y
Debt
ratio
rg
r=g
rg
Time
We have shown that
Δd
rg
d
where
D
d
Y
Debt
ratio
rg
r=g
rg
Time
We have shown that
Δd
rg
d
where
D
d
Y
Debt
ratio
rg
r=g
rg
Time
Primary deficit = GN – T = G – T – iDG
Primary balance: PB = T – G + iDG
Take another look
Intertemporal budget constraint:
Dt 1 it Dt-1 PBt
Dividing by nominal GDP (= PY), we get
1 it
Dt
Dt 1 PBt
PY
1 p t 1 gt Pt 1Yt 1 PYt t
t t
dt
1 rt
d t-1 pbt
d t
1 gt
dt 1
pbt
1 it
1 rt
1 pt
We have seen that
1 rt
d t-1 pbt
d t
1 gt
To find where debt ratio is headed,
i.e., the long-run equilibrium value of
d, we set dt = dt-1; this gives
(1 gt ) pbt
dt
gt rt
> 0 if pb < 0 and g > r
Sound
fiscal policy is critical for good
macroeconomic management, and can
help manage capital flows
Fiscal stimulus is usually expansionary, but
not invariably
Fiscal policy crucially affects BOP, and
interacts with monetary policy
Fiscal policy, as before, is crucial to
responding to financial crises
Especially when monetary policy lands in
liquidity trap and loses traction
Fiscal
policy can help foster rapid growth