Transcript Ch18 ppt

Chapter 18
Economic
Policy

WHO GOVERNS?
1. Who in the federal government can
make our economy strong?
2. Who was responsible for the recession?

TO WHAT ENDS?
1. Why does the federal government ever
have a budget deficit?
2. How do you end a recession?
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
The Politics of Economic
Prosperity


Majoritarian politics
Pocketbook Issues
• National level
• Individual level

What Politicians Try to Do
• Unemployment
• Inflation
• Interest rates
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.1 Federal Budget Deficit
(or Surplus)
Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, FY 2009 updated by OMB’s Mid-Session Review, July 2009 © 2003, AAAS.
Reprinted with permission
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
The Politics of Taxing and
Spending

Voters want
• Prosperity
• Lower taxes
• Less debt
• New/continued programs

Objectives are
inconsistent
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
During the recession,
people, including middle
class workers, line up at
the unemployment office.
p. 490 Source: Yellow
Dog Productions/ Getty
Images
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Economic Theories and Political
Needs





Monetarism
Keynesianism
Economic Planning
Supply-side Tax Cuts
DID THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
END THE RECESSION?
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
The Machinery of Economic
Policy Making

The Fed
• Monetary policy – alters
the supply of money
and interest rates

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of
the Federal Reserve, speaks
to a congressional
committee. p. 495 Source:
Mark Wilson/ Getty Images
Congress
• Fiscal policy – uses tax
and spending laws

Globalization
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Corbis/Corbis Sygma
Bettmann/Corbis
Milton
Friedman
Karen Vismara/
Black Star
Arthur B. Laffer
John
Maynard
Keynes
Bettmann/Corbis
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
John Kenneth
Galbraith
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Spending Money

Conflicting interests
• Majoritarian politics
• Client politics
• Interest group politics


Public Opinion
Politicians’ appeals
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
The Budget


Budget
Fiscal Year – October 1 through the
following September 30 (federal)

Budget resolution – A congressional
decision that states the maximum amount
of money the government should spend

Entitlements - A claim for government
funds that cannot be changed without
violating the rights of the claimant
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Reducing Spending


Congressional Budget Act of 1974
Balanced Budget Act of 1985
(Gramm-Rudman Act)
• Sequester – automatic spending cuts

Budget Enforcement Act of 1990
• Limits on discretionary spending
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.2 Federal Outlays
in 2008
Source: Office of
Management and Budget,
Mid-Season Review, 2009.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.2 Federal Revenues
in 2008
Source: Office of
Management and Budget,
Mid-Season Review, 2009.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.3 Social Security and
Medicare Cost as a % of GDP
p. 498
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Trustees’
Report, 2009.
Levying Taxes

Majoritarian politics
• Modest tax burden
• Minimize cheating

Client politics
• Loopholes

Rise in the Income Tax
•
•
•
•
Sixteenth Amendment
Tax Reform Act of 1986
Tax increase of 1993
Tax cuts of 2002
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.4 Tax
Burdens in
Democratic Nations
(Taxes as a
Percentage of
Income of a Family
with Two Children)
Source: Statistical Abstract of the United
States, 2003, Table 1344.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Figure 18.5 Federal Taxes on Income,
Top Percentage Rates 1913-2002
Source: Updated from Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (September 18, 1993), 2488.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
MEMORANDUM
To: Elizabeth Gilbert, chairperson, Council of Economics
From: Edward Larson, White House speechwriter
Subject: Flat tax proposal
The President would like your advice on whether to
endorse a flat tax. His likely opponent is pushing this
issue.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Arguments for:
1. A flat tax is fair because it treats all income groups the
same. We could leave the lowest income group with no
taxes.
2. With a flat tax, we could eliminate almost all deductions
and loopholes from the tax code.
3. Countries with a flat tax, such as Lithuania, have achieved
great economic prosperity.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Arguments against:
1. A flat tax is unfair because it treats all income groups the
same. The rich should be taxed more heavily.
2. Many tax deductions, such as the one for home mortgages,
are desirable.
3. We could eliminate undesirable tax loopholes without
creating a flat tax.
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Your decision:
Support?
Oppose?
Copyright © 2011 Cengage
Tribune Media Services, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted by permission. p. 502
Copyright © 2011 Cengage