Towards Asian Economic Community: Relevance of India
Download
Report
Transcript Towards Asian Economic Community: Relevance of India
Asian Regionalism
by
Nagesh Kumar
RIS
www.ris.org.in
Outline
• Impetus for Asian Regionalism
• Status of regional economic cooperation in Asia and
its limitations
• Relevance of a pan-Asian Framework
• Approaches to pan-Asian Economic cooperation
• Gains from Asian economic integration
• Relevance of India for East Asian Integration
• Concluding Remarks
Asian Regionalism
2
Impetus for Asian regionalism
• Response to western regionalism
• Slow progress of multilateral trade negotiations
• Emergence of Asia as a centre of final demand
• Asia emerging as the centre of gravity of the world economy with 2 of
the 3 largest economies in the world
• Urge to exploit synergies
• Initially driven by flying geeze; now vertical specialization
• 55% of Asia’s trade with itself
• Shaping the global economic governance
• Global imbalances and Asian regionalism
Asian Regionalism
3
Regional Economic Cooperation
in Asia
•
Bangkok Agreement, 1975
• Sub-regional
– Economic Integration in ASEAN: AFTA and beyond
– Economic Cooperation in South Asia:
• SAPTA (1993)/ SAFTA Agreement (2004)
– BIMSTEC Framework Agreement (2004)
• ASEAN+1 FTAs
• FTAs between China-ASEAN, India-ASEAN, Japan-ASEAN, ASEAN-South Korea
• FTAs between Individual ASEAN countries and +1 countries: Japan-Singapore, IndiaThailand, India-Singapore CECA, China-Malaysia, Japan-Malaysia, Japan-Philippines,
India-Malaysia
• Between +1 countries: e.g. India-China, India-Japan, and India-Korea
• Move towards broader arrangements:
• ASEAN plus Three
• East Asia Summit (EAS) or ASEAN plus six
Asian Regionalism
4
A Virtual Asian Community is already
emerging from a complex web of FTAs
Japan
China
Malaysia
Philippines
CLMV
Countries
ASEAN
Indonesia
Brunei
Singapore
Thailand
S. Korea
India
Frame work Agreements signed
Under negotiation
Under study
Asian Regionalism
5
Limitations of Existing Regional
Arrangements
• Limitations of Sub-regional/ bilateral Cooperation
• Similar factor endowments and economic structures in the sub-region
provide for limited complementarities
• Do not provide a seamless market to businesses to region-wide
industrial restructuring
Sub-regional/bilateral cooperation cannot enable Asia to exploit the
full potential of regional economic integration
• Need for an over-arching, pan-Asian framework to
facilitate exploitation of considerable synergies for
mutual benefit
Asian Regionalism
6
Approaches to pan-Asian Economic
Cooperation (1)
• Consolidate the ongoing sub-regional/bilateral schemes of
cooperation
• Evolving a pan-Asian framework for cooperation: Asian
Economic Community in a phased manner
• In the first phase: evolve a structure with a core group of
countries
• Once the grouping has consolidated, extend the membership to
other countries in the region
Asian Regionalism
7
Approaches to pan-Asian Regional
Economic Cooperation (2)
• Taking advantage of the fact that some cooperation is already
on in ASEAN+1 frameworks, Japan, ASEAN, China, India
and Korea (JACIK) or ASEAN+3+India could form the core
group
• EAS brings together all the JACIK countries and Australia
and New Zealand
• Hence, EAS could be the right forum for evolving a broader
regional arrangement in Asia
Asian Regionalism
8
Approaches to pan-Asian Regional
Economic Cooperation (3)
• To develop a comprehensive economic partnership
arrangement (CEPA) of EAS
• a framework coalescing the growing web of FTAs linking the
EAS members
• EAS agreed to launch a feasibility study for CEPEA at
Cebu Summit on 15 January 2007
• CEPEA could be extended in due course to other Asian
countries to create a truly pan-Asian grouping
Asian Regionalism
9
Emerging EAS in relation to EU and
NAFTA
billion US$ in 2004
Parameter
EU
NAFTA
EAS
• EAS is larger
than EU and
10137
12847
16716
Gross National Income, PPP
(in Purchasing Power Parity)
NAFTA in terms
20.14
25.53
33.22
% of World total
of GDP, trade
bigger than
10505
12431
8198
GDP
NAFTA, half of
29.37
34.76
22.92
% of World total
world’s
3523
1486
1757
Exports (2002)
population and
46.50
19.62
23.20
% of World total
more than two
285
170
1757
International Reserves
thirds of world’s
foreign exchange Population (millions)
381
425
3089
Source: RIS based on World Bank, World Development Indicators 2005, CD-ROM; IMF, International Financial Statistics 2004.
reserves
6.12
6.83
49.65
% of World total
Asian Regionalism
10
Gains from broader Economic
Integration in Asia
• Substantial welfare gains
from economic
integration in scenarios of
progressive integration
• All participants benefit
• Welfare gain up to 3% of
region’s GDP
• Even the rest of the world
benefits from deeper
integration
million US$
Scenario I Scenario II Scenario III
Japan
107626
111807
150695
Korea
13043
13317
14076
China-HK
6327
7100
16328
ASEAN (5)
13451
13553
19405
India
6971
7379
9937
JACIK
147418
153156
210441
Rest of the world -27293
-45306
109916
World
120125
107849
320357
Asian Regionalism
11
Gains from Economic Integration in
Asia: Further Evidence
Brooks et al. 2005 ADB study
• Regional trade and integration offers Asia great potential for rapid
and sustained growth
– Much of Asia’s benefits from global trade liberalization can be realized by
regional initiative alone
– Regional integration will lead to economic convergence, rising growth
rates and benefit poorer countries
– Transfer the growth stimulus from China and India to their neighbours
– Increase trade and incomes for the rest of the world
AEC could be an ‘arc of advantage, peace and prosperity’ Prime
Minister Dr Manmohan Singh
Asian Regionalism
12
EAS versus ASEAN plus Three
• Welfare gains are
significantly higher for all
partners in EAS than in an
APT framework
• Gains to the region higher
than India’s gains
Asia
India
ASEAN (5)
– Possibly due to dynamism and
synergies that India brings to
the grouping in terms of
services and software to the
hardware and manufacturing
prowess of East Asia
China-HK
Korea
JACIK
Asean+3
Japan
0
Asian Regionalism
50000
100000
150000
200000
million US$
13
250000
Relevance of India for East Asian
Integration
• India’s emergence as a dynamic economy of Asia with strong macrofundamentals
• East Asia has emerged as the largest trade partner of India with rapid growth of
trade
• Evolving FTAs with ASEAN and China, Japan and South Korea
• Strong complementarities between India and other East Asian economies
• Indian economy getting increasingly integrated with East Asian production
chains especially in knowledge-based segments such as chip design, embedded
software, R&D
• Indian companies are also evolving Asian production networks
• Complementary demographic trends
• Geographic, historical and cultural bonds with East Asia
• A bridge between East and West Asia
Asian Regionalism
14
Other areas of cooperation for EAS
•
•
•
•
Monetary and Financial Cooperation
Regional Cooperation for Energy Security
Cooperation in S&T and Disaster Management
Regional institution-building
– evolving an Asian Identity
• Regional Cooperation in Global Economic
Governance
Asian Regionalism
15
Monetary and financial cooperation
• Growing consensus on the importance of reserve pooling
• Need to build on the Chiang-Mai Initiative
• A modest pooling of 5% of region’s reserves in a regional
institution: e.g. ARB, AIB, RBA
• Exchange rate stability
• An ACU as a unit of account backed by the Asian Reserve
• Asian Fund for financing huge infrastructure investments and regional
public goods
• Huge requirement for infrastructure investments in EAS region
• Additional demand generation to enable fuller utilization of capacity
• Finance is on the EAS agenda
Asian Regionalism
16
Cooperation for Energy Security
• Potential for fruitful regional cooperation
• Joint exploration/ oil equity in third countries as
well as within the region
• Regional oil/gas grid
• Common strategic reserves
• Asian energy market
• Energy conservation
• Maritime security/ protection of sea lanes
• Cebu Declaration on East Asian Security
Asian Regionalism
17
Concluding Remarks and the Way
Forward (1)
• Substantial potential of pan-Asian economic integration in helping
Asia resume a high growth path by complementing ongoing subregional approaches in realizing the Asian Dream
• Also a win-win for the rest of the world
• Growing economic interdependence will also promote peace and
reconciliation and disaster management
• EAS can play an important role in fostering broader regional
cooperation in Asia by evolving a CEPEA and exploiting
opportunities for regional cooperation in finance, energy security,
mitigation of natural disasters, in shaping the global architecture etc.
• With its dynamic economy and synergies with East Asian countries,
India is in a position to contribute to such cooperation
Asian Regionalism
18
Thank you
Asian Regionalism
19