Financial system in B&H in combination with the financial crises and
Download
Report
Transcript Financial system in B&H in combination with the financial crises and
Financial Crisis and their
affects on the Financial System
& Real Sector in B&H
Damir Njuhović, PhD Candidate at
SSST/Buckingham University
International Burch University, Sarajevo date:
17.04.2012
Three broad topics
1. History of Financial system in B&H
2. How did 2007/2008 Crisis start / spill over to
B&H / result in new Crisis 2011/2012
3. The consequence on B&H economy (banks and
real sector)
Practical examples & possible way forward
B&H financial system prior to crisis
System before 1992- a socialist regime (pre 1992)
Centralized system with one bank at the Republic level
Huge industrial systems with “Leading companies”
Functioning of system, approval process, coordination
between republics
System following 1996 until 2000 (1996-2000)
New emerging banks
Small accumulation of deposits – low trust
Restricted foreign credit lines
Introduction of currency board
Financial system from 2000 onwards
Entrance of Foreign banks 2001 onwards
Standards for loan approval (market aggressive behavior)
HVB retail and Hypo Corporate
Price setting behavior but no Bond market until 2009
Competition prices went from 25% to 7-8% in 2008
Also improvement in supporting institutions, court,
financial reports etc.
Opening of stock market 2002/2003
Situation as it is before crisis
Uncoordinated privatization practice:
- unconnected companies within large industry
system
- many SME’s (riskier) and lost market especially
foreign penetration
Many new Banks at country level
- no umbrella bank / uncoordinated practice by
banks commercially based
- different strategies (retail, treasury, large, foreign
companies etc…)
Finances available through
Bank credit (by far most common form)
Leasing (financial / operational) + R/E recently
Factoring (only “Prvi Factor” present part of NLB Group)
since 2007
- some current banks plan to organize factoring
Micro Financial Institutions (MFI’s)
Private equity & Capital markets
- IPO (Initial Public Offering very low activity, restricted
exit for potential equity investors)
- Corporate bond market underdeveloped with few issues
How does Financial support
approval process function
Request, source Treasury if LT, internal meetings,
risk consultation, layer consultation collateral
wise, short credit analysis, indicative offer,
Client meeting, Law department, credit analysis
(financial, quantitative),
Risk, overall application, risk
Credit Committee final decision, law department.
Beginning of crisis 2008
What is the trigger of the crisis?
- Asset securitization (what is it and how it has occurred?)
What is it?
- Bundling and transfer of cash generating assets on capital
market
- Assets legally separated from originator and rated as such
- Originator withholds first loss peace and slices portfolio
to get better rating
Government sponsored agencies stimulated AS
Interest rates versus mortgage prices
USA Bank loans amount to 10% GDP while bonds /
securities to 150% GDP
Basel I all loans in same basket irrespective of risk up to
2005
AS enabled huge leverage and asset increase while RWA
was controlled
Basel II (2005-2008)
- allowed IRA in each bank to access risk
- properly secured mortgage loans low risk
- industry loans higher risk
But was late as RWA / asset gaming continued until
2007/2008 (see graph)
Spill over effect from USA real estate market to the rest of
world
Huge liquidity squeeze in combination with the run on
deposits end of 2008 Consequential loan reduction to
withhold Bank solvency in B&H
Highly restricted credit lines from abroad
Lost trust between Banks
Overall 2008 crisis is Liquidity crisis
Beginning of “new” crisis 2011/2012
Fiscal stimulus to real sector and banks resulted in over
indebtedness
Over indebted countries largely on a periphery of EU (less
industry/competitiveness)
Especially dangerous countries using EUR as a monetary
mean
Unequal competitiveness in Europe
- those that adopted EUR as official currency and
- those over indebted in foreign currency loans – small
devaluation possibility
What about USA and their indebtedness – is it coming?
Question and answer session
New Basel III regulation (see table)
TCE / RWA = min. 7%
roughly 7 times increase in tangible capital to
Basel II
TCE counts as only loss absorbent part of equity
shortened period to adapt until 01.jan.2013
in EU 9% tangible capital adequacy ratio
introduced (until 30.06.2012)
huge competition for capital – lack of capital
Banks required to withhold 30 day system wide
liquidity shock
RWA - Risk Weighted assets
before crisis much slower growth in respect to
total assets
after crisis quick growth (i.e. performance
guarantee which counts 20% RWA in good times
counts 100% in bad times)
growth of RWA / assets on graph still not
observed – suspicion for RWA gaming
European banks started to look seriously
undercapitalized
Low correlation in crisis and non
crisis periods RWA:
Basel III impact largely on SME’s in B&H
adequate capitalization of NWB’s in respect to
rising NPL
limited help from parent expected
therefore very strict approval criteria
undercapitalized parent banks – limited operations
in SEE
especially towards riskier businesses
new capital everybody competing for
new liquidity requirements – limits long term
loans / restructuring
The consequences for B&H
How did crisis spill to B&H?
- export reduction (heavy industry affected most)
- lack of new credit lines in combination with deposit
withdrawal
Results in rising illiquidity in domestic market
Vienna Initiative – build up of cash position in CBBH
(lack of good projects)
Reorientation of commercial banks on retail sector – it is
short sighted vision!
Lost relationship with SME’s (98% of companies in B&H)
Hard to regain relationship – un transparent information
from SME’s
Low credit growth / stagnation
Loan price increase / however limited to cover as
competition is high
Deteriorating fiscal position
Lack of collateral – value revised in combination with
illiquidity
Over indebted companies lacking market for their products
(uncompetitive in foreign markets)
RWA gaming in B&H (table)
Limited collateral disposal in highly illiquid environment
- assets more relevant as measure of RWA
Practical examples (see paper)
Examples of how companies from different sectors of the
economy were affected & dealt with crisis:
IT Sector (retail, wholesale & software programming)
Wood industry
Supermarket retail chains (food, hardware – expand or be
acquired)
Pharmaceutical industry (expand or be acquired)
Real estate (liquidity squeeze) &
Cement industry (fall in sales, secured receivables)
Practical examples continued
Auto industry (VW, Cimos, Alloy Weal)
Heavy metal, coal and coke industry
(ArcelorMittal, GIKIL, Coal mines)
Food industry (Mims group, organic food – not
organized etc…)
To big to fail companies
Foreign versus domestic companies:
- parent help expected
- coordinated restructuring action at parent level
Possible way forward
Organization of industrial development bank
Coordination at country level and reunification of
broken supplier / buyer chains
FDI but distinction between market and export
orientated
Liquid capital markets (bond / equity)
Factoring as in Mexico (reliance on credible big
buyer)
Limitations
Source of cheap funding in illiquid environment
Lack of potential investors (country rating, lost
trust, pension reform,
- life insurance as alternative institutional investor
– needs time for people to adopt to new system)
Destroyed supplier / buyer chain many
companies already sold,
- lost market, need to regain reputation again,
- experienced workers getting older and older……
Fixed exchange rate to EUR (CB) – one of
greatest limitations
- productivity growth should follow growth of
productivity in exporting countries otherwise
unemployment rise / wage cuts to boost
competitiveness……
Solution to re orientate to less advanced countries
in Africa / Asia
or seek cheaper funds from EU & top edge
technology…….
CBBiH – Central Bank role
Only one mean to affect monetary politic through obligatory
reserve relaxation on short term and long term deposits
No effect from S/T deposits relaxation:
- current crisis is not Bank liquidity crisis
- to overcome illiquidity in real-sector structural reform needed
(improve receivable collection method / factoring) or as some
suggest:
- relaxation of CB terms and conditions and printing money based
on FX reserves which are currently 1:1 to domestic currency in
oscillation – possible source of instability in future
Lender of last resort function done by Foreign banks and credit
lines – compensate for Trade imbalance
Question and answer session
Conclusion
Destroyed industrial systems – 98% SME’s (lost adequate
supply chain)
Various different banks with different strategies
Restricted L/T financing
Restricted overall financing Basel III on SME’s
Liquidity not problem but ratio Capital / RWA
Proportional reduction in RWA (danger relationship will
be lost)
Fixed exchange rate not competitive on international
market
FDI predominantly market orientated