Prezentácia

Download Report

Transcript Prezentácia

Pension Reform in the
Slovak republic
Experiences and
Recomendations for Moldavian
Government
Pension Reform Workshop
Leogrand Hotel
Chisinov, 10-11 June 2008
Marek L e n d a c k y
Slovak Republic
Fully-funded 2nd pillar in brief


start of operation:
number of participants:


number of pension companies:
NPV of assets as of 30 May, 2008:
January 1, 2005
about 1.5 million people out of 2.2
employed
6 (after wave of consolidation)
SKK 60.2 billion (EUR 2,0 billion)
 voluntary switch to multi-pillar pension system opened till from
January 1, 2005 till June 30, 2006; then again from January 1,
2008 till June 30, 2008
 9% contribution rate out of total 18% to old age pension fund
 Investment returns: 2,5% - 4,5% in conservative funds,
3,0% – 4,5% in balanced funds
3,0% – 5,0% in growth funds
 fee structure: 1% of each monthly contribution
0,065% of monthly NPV of assets of the pension fund
Macroeconomic environment
2005
2006
2007
Real GDP growth (% of GDP)
6,6 %
8,5 %
10,4 %
Public finance deficit (% of GDP)
4,2 %
3,6 %
2,2 %
Transition costs (% of GDP)
1,2 %
1,3 %
1,3 %
Market capitalisation of shares
(% of GDP)
9,48 %
8,78 %
8,50 %
Market capitalisation of bonds
(% of GDP)
28,39 %
25,84 %
24,96 %
Total turnover (bln. EUR)
- turnover of shares
- turnover of bonds
33,26
0,21%
99,79%
32,93
0,26%
99,74%
11,71
0,21%
99,79%
No of listed companies
13
10
10
IPOs
0
0
0
3 types of pension funds
Balanced pension funds
Conservative pension funds
1%
16%
26%
3%
47%
52%
12%
43%
Bank deposits
Bonds
Receivables
5%
14%
Bank deposits
Stocks and unit shares
Bonds
Other Instruments
Receivables
Bonds
Other Instruments
 Overall conservative
24%
39%
Stocks and unit shares
Receivables
Growth pension funds
18%
Bank deposits
investments
 Portfolio in balanced and
growth pension fund similar
 After initial „building trust“
phase more dynamism needed
Who is watching?
...five levels of control
 pension company
bears primary responsibility for proper management of pension funds, individual retirement accounts
must have a special watchdog system based on risk management
 National Bank of Slovakia
oversees day-by-day life of each pension company
 depositary bank
responsible for compliance of all transactions with the law
reports all shortcomings to market watchdog
 external auditor
checks the performance of DSS and pension funds
 clients themselves
with a non-stop access to their individual retirement accounts and disclosure requirements, they see the
performance of their DSS and/or pension fund
may „vote“ and change their pension fund, even leave their DSS and switch to a rival company
Investment returns in first 3 years
2005
2006
5,50%
5,50%
5,00%
5,00%
4,50%
4,50%
4,00%
4,00%
3,50%
3,50%
3,00%
3,00%
2,50%
2,50%
2,00%
2,00%
1,50%
1,50%
1,00%
1,00%
0,50%
0,50%
0,00%
0,00%
Conservative
Balanced
Growth
Conservative
Balanced
Growth
2007
 Investment returns around from
5,50%
5,00%
4,50%
4,00%
3,50%
3,00%
2,50%
2,00%
1,50%
1,00%
0,50%
0,00%
Conservative
Balanced
Growth
2,5% - 4,5% in conservative funds,
3,0% – 4,5% in balanced funds and
3,0% – 5,0% in growth funds
 More effort in the future have to
be done to meet pensions level
expectations
Favourable age structure
Number of members
Age structure of members
75+
0,0%
75+
22
70 - 74
0,0%
70 - 74
49
65 - 69
0,0%
65 - 69
228
60 - 64
0,0%
60 - 64
540
55 - 59
0,2%
55 - 59
3 023
50 - 54
2,7%
10,1%
45 - 49
35 - 39
30 - 34
20,7%
25 - 29
15,0%
329 338
30 - 34
314 735
25 - 29
11,7%
10,0%
264 067
35 - 39
21,7%
5,0%
235 048
40 - 44
17,4%
20 - 24
154 008
45 - 49
15,5%
40 - 44
0,0%
41 449
50 - 54
177 158
20 - 24
20,0%
25,0%
0
50 000
100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000
...some issues in 2nd pillar were
questionable
 Initial small transfer problems
 Intermediary agents problems – lack of quality
 False signature of contracts
 „Swiss pension“ advertising...
 Relatively low investment returns...
...but some were seen as
tremendous success
Unified contribution collection
Central registry of contracts in SIA preventing multiple switching
No burden for employers resulting from 2nd pillar existence
Very favorable age structure despite of free switching matrix
Cleaning of registry of persons on behalf state pays contributions
to SIA
 Increased awareness of necessity think of future pension
situation and thus increased interest of 3rd pillar products





...and in 3rd pillar
 Transformation so called pension insurance companies (not far
from pyramidal schemes) to standard voluntary pension funds
Thank you for your attention!