Transcript Curriculum Development in Finland

Curriculum Development in
Finland
Pasi Sahlberg, PhD
Senior Education Specialist
World Bank
1
Brief outlook
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Population: 5.2 million
The most northern corner of the EU
GDP per capita: $26,000
4,100 comprehensive schools (1-9 grades)
475 upper secondary schools
50,000 teachers
Public expenditure on educational
institutions: 5.7 % of the GDP
2
Why curriculum change?
• Situation in the beginning of 1990s
– Teachers rarely used curriculum in their work
– Teachers demanded more freedom
– Teachers’ professional qualifications were
increasing
– Decentralization of public administration
– Central administration didn’t know exactly
how schools could improve performance
– Paradigm shift in understanding learning
3
What was the solution?
• New National Framework Curriculum 1994
– Loose conceptual framework describing
intended experiences rather than content
– Schools were invited to design their own
curricula (but not by Law)
– Increased flexibility and freedom of choice
– Focus on new conception of learning
– Support to schools in curriculum design
4
What happened?
• Schools progressed in different rhythms
• School curricula became very diverse (but
still based on a common core)
• Curriculum became a school improvement
instrument and an active reference for
schools
• Schools created new identities and profiles
• Fundamental curriculum change!
5
Possible impact of 1994 reform
• Focus shifted from individual teachers to
school as a community of professionals
• The hidden potentials in schools, i.e.
motivation, creativity and moral purposes
were released but some got burned-out
• Trusting teachers increased their working
commitments
• Schools became gradually learning centers
6